Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Gun Control & RKBA
Related: About this forumAttorney: Draconian gun laws put NJ man in prison for 35 days
Yes it's from 2013. Yes, it's just more evidence of racism.
Tell me again, why we should eschew guns and rely on law enforcement.
http://dailycaller.com/2013/03/14/attorney-draconian-gun-laws-put-nj-man-in-prison-for-35-days-after-police-search-home-without-a-warrant/
.....
Pantaleon said the officers knew the charges were false.
I heard these two cops speaking to each other a couple doors down from me, when I was in lockup at the West District. A couple hours after they pulled me out of my home and threw me into the cage in their precinct one of them said, I know these charges are BS, but this is what you have to do if you want to be a cop-cop.
I heard these two cops speaking to each other a couple doors down from me, when I was in lockup at the West District. A couple hours after they pulled me out of my home and threw me into the cage in their precinct one of them said, I know these charges are BS, but this is what you have to do if you want to be a cop-cop.
http://www.evannappen.com/jersey-city-man-granted-suppression-of-all-evidence-obtained-due-to-officersrsquo-unlawful-entry-of-his-home.html
Here, the police conduct and entering Defendants apartment, without a warrant, and without satisfying an exception to the warrant requirement, violated Defendants federal and state constitutional rights. As a result, all evidence seized as a result of the Officers warrantless entry and search of Defendants apartment must be suppressed.
The Court found that the officers testimony simply did not have a ring of truthfulness to it.
The Court struck down every exemption to the warrant requirement that the State contended --
The Court struck down emergency aid, ...
The Court struck down exigency, ...
The Court found that Pantaleon never consented to a search of his apartment, and that the landlord did not have authority to allow officers entry into Pantaleons apartment.
Lastly, the Court struck down the States contention that plain view applied, as the Officers were not in a permissible vantage point to view Pantaleon in the first instance, and that, even if they had been, nothing was immediately apparent to the Officer that was contraband or evidence of a crime.
Furthermore, an Officer inexcusably moved an item in Pantaleons bedroom in order to better view what was inside.
The Court found that the officers testimony simply did not have a ring of truthfulness to it.
The Court struck down every exemption to the warrant requirement that the State contended --
The Court struck down emergency aid, ...
The Court struck down exigency, ...
The Court found that Pantaleon never consented to a search of his apartment, and that the landlord did not have authority to allow officers entry into Pantaleons apartment.
Lastly, the Court struck down the States contention that plain view applied, as the Officers were not in a permissible vantage point to view Pantaleon in the first instance, and that, even if they had been, nothing was immediately apparent to the Officer that was contraband or evidence of a crime.
Furthermore, an Officer inexcusably moved an item in Pantaleons bedroom in order to better view what was inside.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 1459 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (2)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Attorney: Draconian gun laws put NJ man in prison for 35 days (Original Post)
discntnt_irny_srcsm
Aug 2015
OP
NJ law seems to resonate most with Jim (large, raucous black bird) laws, imo.
Eleanors38
Aug 2015
#1
Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)1. NJ law seems to resonate most with Jim (large, raucous black bird) laws, imo.
discntnt_irny_srcsm
(18,479 posts)4. You'd think that after the Civil War all the...
...Southern plantation owners moved to New Jersey.
Shrike47
(6,913 posts)2. The problem wasn't gun laws, it was illegal police actions.
Nuclear Unicorn
(19,497 posts)3. Even if the police had lawful cause for being in Pantaleon's apartment
the laws are still excessive. What reason would there be for sending him to prison for 35 years except GUNZ!