Gun Control & RKBA
Related: About this forumLawmakers say Ohio shooting won't change nation's gun rights
House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) downplayed new gun control legislation in light of Monday's high-school shooting in his native Ohio.
Asked if the shooting would prompt some kind of legislative crackdown on gun rights, Boehner nixed the idea.
---------
The shooting took place roughly 25 miles east of Cleveland, an area represented by Rep. Steven LaTourette (R-Ohio), a close Boehner ally. LaTourette took to the House floor Tuesday afternoon to lead the chamber in a moment of silence. He condemned a tragedy he said has become "all too frequent" in the United States, but did not address the issue of gun reform.
LaTourette spokeswoman Deborah Setliff said it would be "inappropriate" to talk about gun reforms so soon after the shooting. "That's not even an issue to be discussed right now," she said.
http://thehill.com/homenews/news/213107-boehner-ohio-shooting-wont-change-gun-rights
Biggest Obstacle to Gun Control Reform = The Republican Party -
montanto
(2,966 posts)bowens43
(16,064 posts)it's time the US grows up and joins the rest of the civilized world and enact extreme control over hand guns and ammunition.
montanto
(2,966 posts)But that has nothing to do with guns, per se.
shadowrider
(4,941 posts)When will you be moving there?
oneshooter
(8,614 posts)would you enact? Tell us and then we can work it out.
oneshooter
(8,614 posts)SteveW
(754 posts)Gin, gays, guns, ganja:
Prohibition doesn't work. Why do you think it will?
ellisonz
(27,711 posts)...and is along a major drug smuggling route. Funny how you leave those two essential facts out.
gejohnston
(17,502 posts)the same is true where most of the murders in the US are. That includes the US Virgin Islands which has a murder rate about the same as Jamaica. But it seems like there is a double standard. When it comes to countries with less poverty than the US (much of Europe for example) you claim its the guns even though gun ownership in many of those countries are about the same as the US (going by the polls claiming dropping gun ownership.) Is there a reason DC has a higher murder rate than a city of similar size in VA? Why is El Paso, TX, safer than not only Ciuidad Juarez but also Vancouver, BC?
Funny thing about US and Canadian murder rates. Our murder rates have been following the same cycle since 1920, looking like a perfect sine wave. Canadian murder rates pretty much does the same thing. 2011 had record gun sales in both countries.
ileus
(15,396 posts)why should law abiding gun owners be punished by some stupid feel good legislation?
-..__...
(7,776 posts)the millions of gun owners and 2nd amendment supporters like myself, that with no hesitation, will continue to block and defeat any feeble attempts at "gun control reform"... count on it.
rl6214
(8,142 posts)How do you see it that way when the Obama administration held a majority that could not be defeated in both the House and the Senate the first two years of his administration. If 'everyone' wanted gun control reform, why wasn't it done when it was a sure thing to get done?
ellisonz
(27,711 posts)Democrats had 60 votes in the Senate for like only 47 days or something, and that was a weak majority. Takes 60 votes or nothing gets passed.
You can't deny it: The Republicans are batshit crazy. I don't get how some people can cherry-pick GOP views that they agree with. IMHO political opinion is not grocery shopping. It's a question of fundamental approach to the basic questions of governance in our society.
rl6214
(8,142 posts)with the same views.
Just because YOU don't like the counter-arguement, dosen't make it toothless. The fact remains the President had a SOLID backing, that is how the health bill got passed or did you forget?
ellisonz
(27,711 posts)...did you not know that? The fact is that some Democrats are more interested in political power than anything else, and I find that to be a lousy political philosophy.
aikoaiko
(34,172 posts)This is not a strictly partisan issue (although there are trends in both parties).
The truth is that those who favor restricting guns from law abiding residents are a dwindling minority.
ellisonz
(27,711 posts)The trend lines here are pretty clear.
This is not an issue that is going to go away. Throw the Pukes and their sympathizers out and there will be common sense gun control reform.
shadowrider
(4,941 posts)NO references to websites
NO references to blogs
NO references from Brady or VPC
YOUR words.
I'll wait
ellisonz
(27,711 posts)...that addresses the still unacceptably high level of gun violence, while balancing the concerns of gun owners and victims, in order to reduce the number of criminal acts committed with guns.
My turn: You were explicitly requested by a female member of DU to change your over-the-top and crass signature line and still have not done so. Do you not care that by all accounts a reasonable woman finds it to be out-of-line?
Tue Feb 28, 2012, 05:29 AM
29. A little off topic here, but...
A little off topic here, but...
please reconsider your "definition" of gun control at the end of your posts.
For the record, we are gun owners in this home. My husband is an avid sportsman. I don't know enough about guns and during his retirement we're going to spend some time on that.
I had a very close family member who was raped. I won't go into any detail about it, but there is no way she could have reached for a gun at any time.
Your "definition", which I'm sure is well-meant, is actually just causing some people here consternation about very painful episodes in their lives.
I know you mean no disrespect and am quite sure that you don't actually want to turn people away from what you believe in.
Thanks for listening.
http://sync.democraticunderground.com/117218217#post29
Do you not care or do you care and still don't give a shit how offensive that little screed that seems to be all over the right-wing gun nut blogosphere is to women because it politicizes rape?
gejohnston
(17,502 posts)how about actually learning what current federal laws are? Most antis don't have the slightest clue. Ohio may or may not have a law against giving a gun to a minor. That is not relevant because, one Lane stole it and two, there is a federal law against it. It is like the record keeping and police inspection scores on the Brady score card. It is federal law and has been for your entire life. Come to think of it, it has been a federal law for my entire life. It was part of the Federal Firearms Act of 1938.
shadowrider
(4,941 posts)address the still unacceptably high level of gun violence, while balancing the concerns of gun owners and victims, in order to reduce the number of criminal acts committed with guns.
That sentence tells me nothing about what you would do, specifically.
ellisonz
(27,711 posts)You just don't like my answer because your playing a game that involves me getting super-specific and then you complaining about it like a wailing toddler.
You answer my question and I might decide to humor you by getting into specifics.
Why is it that you are quoting a Libertarian author who they love over at Free Republic and are ignoring the objections of a Democratic woman to its political usage of rape? Do you think rape is something that should be flung at your political opponents?
I suggest you change your signature line, and I also take deep offense at your image that uses totalitarian dictators as a political tool also. Repugnant.
shadowrider
(4,941 posts)an anonymous user for something HE believes.
You really need a life dude, get out or something.
That is between no one but me and her and I've explained myself. You need to stay out of it.
ellisonz
(27,711 posts)...are you suggesting that men shouldn't stand up with women for not being used as a political punchline by a bunch of Freepers? Excuse me. You need to take a hint and change it. Are you really that resistant to change that you refuse to go with something less offensive?
I have a life and I get out plenty.
Response to shadowrider (Reply #59)
ellisonz This message was self-deleted by its author.
Marengo
(3,477 posts)would you be willing to respond to me with specifics were I to ask for them?
ellisonz
(27,711 posts)...that right-wing non-sense?
Marengo
(3,477 posts)I am genuinely curious as to what specific proposals you have in mind.
shadowrider
(4,941 posts)They speak in generalities such as "common sense gun laws" without getting specific.
Response to Marengo (Reply #66)
ellisonz This message was self-deleted by its author.
SteveW
(754 posts)SteveW
(754 posts)ellisonz
(27,711 posts)You've posted since: http://www.democraticunderground.com/117218901#post4
Why do you feel the need to demonize those who disagree with you? Why aren't you being responsive to blue_neen?
SteveW
(754 posts)petronius
(26,602 posts)people should toe a party line without question, "my party, right or wrong!"?
Personally, I think it's far more appropriate to examine every issue critically through one's own values and reasoning - recognizing that any party or group will be wrong on this or that...
ellisonz
(27,711 posts)...they should toe the party line unless they want to be openly questioned by their fellow partisans on why they are dissenting. That's party politics, and it might not be the ideal, but it's the way it has been since George W. Washington left office.
Would you vote against a Democrat to the benefit of a Republican because of your beliefs regarding firearm regulation?
petronius
(26,602 posts)I think it's healthy and appropriate to carefully examine every issue for yourself, recognize when your party is wrong, and speak up about it. Do you disagree with that?
ellisonz
(27,711 posts)Have the debate behind closed doors - but accept the party consensus. That's what the Republicans do, and that's why they've been kicking our ass at the ballot box for much of the last three decades.
Common Sense Party
(14,139 posts)Gaia help you if you dislike the groupthink.
ellisonz
(27,711 posts)petronius
(26,602 posts)to have that discussion. Continued reflection is a strengthening process, for individuals and organizations.
And there's no reason to hide that discussion on gun rights in particular - why would you suggest that there is?
oneshooter
(8,614 posts)ellisonz
(27,711 posts)oneshooter
(8,614 posts)I asked if you denied it, but you never answered. No denial then it must be true.
ellisonz
(27,711 posts)The reference is to the specific policy outcome, not to the system itself.
oneshooter
(8,614 posts)ellisonz
(27,711 posts)oneshooter
(8,614 posts)PavePusher
(15,374 posts)Please make a list of all the political views that are purely Democratic or Republican.
It's called freedom of thought. I know, by your own words here, that this chaffs you mightily.
ellisonz
(27,711 posts)No, this chaffs me mightily:
Guns increase the probability of death in incidents of domestic violence.26
Firearms were used to kill more than two-thirds of spouse and ex-spouse homicide victims between 1990 and 2005.27
Domestic violence assaults involving a firearm are 23 times more likely to result in death than those involving other weapons or bodily force.28
Abused women are five times more likely to be killed by their abuser if the abuser owns a firearm.29
A recent survey of female domestic violence shelter residents in California found that more than one third (36.7%) reported having been threatened or harmed with a firearm.30 In nearly two thirds (64.5%) of the households that contained a firearm, the intimate partner had used the firearm against the victim, usually threatening to shoot or kill the victim.31
Laws that prohibit the purchase of a firearm by a person subject to a domestic violence restraining order are associated with a reduction in the number of intimate partner homicides.32
Between 1990 and 2005, individuals killed by current dating partners made up almost half of all spouse and current dating partner homicides.33
A study of applicants for domestic violence restraining orders in Los Angeles found that the most common relationship between the victim and abuser was a dating relationship, and applications for protective orders were more likely to mention firearms when the parties had not lived together and were not married.34
For additional information about domestic violence and firearms, including background information and state and local laws on the topic, see LCAVs Domestic Violence and Firearms Policy Summary.
http://www.lcav.org/statistics-polling/gun_violence_statistics.asp
beevul
(12,194 posts)The problem is, you want to take it up with the people that aren't doing any of that, as if they were they ones that were.
ellisonz
(27,711 posts)...they are. Is it really that hard to see where there's an issue with unsecured guns here? I'm sorry, but if you can't see the wisdom of CAP laws at the very least I just don't know what to say...
beevul
(12,194 posts)I was talking in general.
gejohnston
(17,502 posts)this has been federal law for almost 20 years, but this is also the organization where the legal director did not know or was dishonest about basic provisions of Gun Control Act of 1968. She also could not think of a single example of a gun law having any effect on crime.
PavePusher
(15,374 posts)Oneka
(653 posts)"Takes 60 votes or nothing gets passed."
Huh... takes 60,, and had 60. Maybe 47 days wasn't enough time to get a small anti-gun bill passed, or ANY gun bill passed?
Pretty hard to blame "batshit crazy republicans" for that failure.
OR ,, maybe the senate Democrats knew something that you don't seem to understand.
GUN CONTROL legislation is political poison. The End.
SteveW
(754 posts)gejohnston
(17,502 posts)that lead to this. Ideologues dancing in blood and distracting everyone with theater and petty ideology.
ellisonz
(27,711 posts)There it is again. What is the fascination with that phrase? I googled it and I only find it on pro-gunner websites
gejohnston
(17,502 posts)but it fits, does it not?
ellisonz
(27,711 posts)Last edited Thu Mar 1, 2012, 10:32 PM - Edit history (1)
A way to deflect claims of responsibility
Common Sense Party
(14,139 posts)As in: guns are compensation for phallus deficiencies?
Guns denote a fearful, phobic mentality?
The grabbers are all about projection.
ellisonz
(27,711 posts)"I'm rubber you're glue, whatever you say bounces off of me and sticks to you!"
I would note though, that I haven't seen anyone critical of our failing gun control policies accuse the opposing side of "dancing in the blood of the victims."
Common Sense Party
(14,139 posts)us as much as you want, but when we point it out to you, you insinuate that we are playing childish games or tossing around infantile name-calling. I just want to understand the rules of your double-standard game.
AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)friendly_iconoclast
(15,333 posts)Look at the anhedonia exhibited by certain posters when the declining crime and murder rates in the US are mentioned.
Some of them will offer some newage psychobabble about how guns 'pollute society' or incur bad karma onto the owner.
gejohnston
(17,502 posts)belongs to a school system that does not deal with bullying or identifying those who need help and providing it. Had that been in place, the problem would not exist. But that is hard work and requires deep thinking and real effort on the parties involved, which is often too much to ask in our society. So politicians see theater to make themselves look good, and ideologues (who wouldn't give a rat's ass if he used any other weapon, even if he killed more people, hence "dancing in blood" use it for propaganda.
I am simply sharing the view of German sociologist Wilhelm Heitmeyer expressed after Tristan van der Vlis shot a bunch of people in a Dutch mall, that stricter gun laws is a distraction from the real issue. (IIRC, Dutch law enforcement do not have access to mental health records while processing gun permits, since their laws were aimed to curb political violence.) The real issue is why do people need to "show in such a dreadful manner that they matter." The real issue is about bullying.
Banning guns, arming teachers, and other distractions are just that. None of them deal with the real fucking issue. If we deal with the real issue, the guns won't matter.
ellisonz
(27,711 posts)...this kid was not especially bullied. Rather, I would argue that the bigger issue we're dealing with his dysfunctional parents making dysfunctional children who then have easy access to weapons.
February 28, 2012 5:40 PM
CHARDON, Ohio - The teenager accused of killing three students in a shooting spree in an Ohio high school cafeteria chose his victims at random and is "someone who's not well," a prosecutor said Tuesday as the slightly built young man appeared in juvenile court.
TJ Lane, 17, admitted taking a .22-caliber pistol and a knife to Chardon High and firing 10 shots at a group of students sitting at a cafeteria table Monday morning, Prosecutor David Joyce said. Joyce said Lane will probably be charged with three counts of aggravated murder and other offenses.
---------
Afterward, though, the prosecutor appeared to rule out rumors and speculation that the gunman lashed out after being bullied or that the shooting had something to do with drug-dealing.
"He chose his victims at random. This is not about bullying. This is not about drugs," Joyce said. "This is someone who's not well, and I'm sure in our court case we'll prove that to all of your desires and we'll make sure justice is done here in this county."
More: http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-201_162-57387081/prosecutor-ohio-shooting-not-about-bullying/
Domestic violence is clearly a factor in this case:
Published: Monday, February 27, 2012, 11:31 PM Updated: Tuesday, February 28, 2012, 7:47 PM
Rachel Dissell, The Plain Dealer By Rachel Dissell, The Plain Dealer
CHARDON, Ohio -- It appears that T.J. Lane had violence in his life from the beginning.
Geauga County court records show the father of the teen who authorities say shot five students at Chardon High School on Monday had been arrested many times for violent crimes against women in his life, including Lane's mother. More than once, police or courts warned him to stay away from the boy and his mother.
---------
The teen had one prior case in Geauga County Juvenile court two years ago. Officials would not release information on the case. But several at the court said the family's troubles were known to social workers in the county.
The father, Thomas Lane Jr., was known to county authorities because of a series of arrests for abusing women in his life, court records show. It's not clear how much contact the father and son had.
More: http://www.cleveland.com/chardon-shooting/index.ssf/2012/02/parents_of_teen_accused_of_sho.html
We live in a culture that glorifies violence, glorifies gun violence, and allows easy access to guns for prohibited classes such as the criminal, the mentally-ill, and those underage.
I give a "rat's ass." I suggest you stop using the phrase as it makes you sound simplistic and crass. This is the real issue. Guns when not in use should be secured, we will found out soon enough if this gun was secured or not. But from the preliminary report, this gun was "left in a barn" by either the uncle or the grandfather. That is the fact of the case, as it has been for many.
gejohnston
(17,502 posts)He stole the pistol from his uncle. How was it secured? I don't know. Do you? Did he break the lock? I doubt it was just sitting in a drawer. As far as I can tell, his uncle was not a prohibited person.
I agree they should be properly secured when not in use.
I'm glad you do. I was not speaking of you specifically, but that is my observation of the gun control movement, such as it is. I meant to be crass. Tell me, if he used a machete would there have been a post here? Think it would be on Brady's radar? Notice they talk about "gun violence" not "violence"
As for the DA, he is a lawyer trying to get a conviction. May be true, it may not be. Ultimately, it is Master Lane's responsibility. He stole the pistol, he took it to school, he fired it.
It is not the fault of the uncle, mother, system, or even the fucking NRA. It is TJ Lane's, and his alone.
You may have something there. Germany and Switzerland are the lands of Schützenfest but, shooter video games are illegal. Hanover, Germany, has the world's largest.
Got a good grip on your pearls yet?
This high school student is firing SIG 550 assault rifle supplied by the Swiss Army (with the selector switch covered so she does not accidently put it on full auto) during Schützenfest. She is competing with others in her age group with the same rifle.
this nine year old is aiming, but has to wait a few years before she can compete with it.
The 8-15 year olds compete with air pistols and air rifles.
ellisonz
(27,711 posts)...because Ohio doesn't have a CAP law of any sort. Neither did Washington...
More surgery for Bremerton school shooting victim, Amina Bowman
by KING 5 News
Posted on February 24, 2012 at 2:48 PM
Updated Friday, Feb 24 at 2:55 PM
SEATTLE -- The third-grade girl accidentally shot while in her Bremerton classroom this week underwent another surgery at Harborview Medical Center Friday morning.
Doctors for Amina Bowman, 8, said she had another "exploratory" surgery at 10:30 a.m. at Harborview. They will allow her condition to stabilize for a few days before performing more surgery. Doctors did not specifically say what was done during the surgery.
Amina remains in critical condition in the Intensive Care Unit.
At a press conference Thursday, Dr. Eileen Bulger, Harborview's Medical Director for Emergency Services and one of Amina's surgeons, said the bullet from the .45 caliber semi-automatic pistol that shot the little girl remains lodged in the muscles around her spine. Amina was shot in the arm, shattering those bones and the bullet continued through her stomach, causing serious damage to her internal organs.
http://www.king5.com/home/Amina-Bowman-undergoes-second-round-of-surgery-still-in-ICU--140363203.html
Bullshit.
gejohnston
(17,502 posts)at 17 you can drive, join the military, you are a fucking adult.
He popped out of the womb at age 17 and just decided to pick up a gun to kill at random.
beevul
(12,194 posts)"He popped out of the womb at age 17 and just decided to pick up a gun to kill at random."
Here let me fix that for you
He popped out of the womb at age 17 and just decided to pick up a gun to kill at random.
His choice was his own, nobody elses.
The gun is no more responsible than a car is in a DUI scenario. Both are controlled properly, or improperly, by the user.
Period.
montanto
(2,966 posts)I will add that there is another cause and effect relationship behind school systems not dealing with these issues well. Teachers and counselors where I live (LA) are trained to spot this type of thing, and required to report it. The problem is that law enforcement often doesn't take threats very seriously, and there isn't a very clear chain of responsibility beyond a teacher/counselor's responsibility to report. Further, due to budgetary issues, due to the relative infrequency of this type of event, due to the ratio of daily "threat-that-comes-to-nothing" versus rare "threat-that-comes-to-harm" most schools don't have an "in-house" way to deal fully with all the threats that arise. Further still, teachers, counselors, and administrators are rarely mental health care professionals on top of everything else, so we can hardly expect them to deal with threats in the way that mental health care professionals would. If people want to reduce this problem even further, they need to fund schools and outreach programs, and get kids the mental health care they obviously need before the event happens. For the antis: Lack of proper and systematic care is the problem, not guns. Ban guns! They'll use knives. Ban knives! They'll use bows and arrows. Ban bows and arrows, they'll make explosives. Ban explosives, they'll set traps, use axe handles, garrote one another. Don't deal with the problem, the problem never ends. This is why gunners accuse antis of dancing in the blood.
montanto
(2,966 posts)Always about guns, never about the problem itself.
Common Sense Party
(14,139 posts)crackdown on alcohol?
I wonder why not.
PavePusher
(15,374 posts)It's the cars that cause drunk driving. They embolden the driver to commit drunk driving. The mere presence of these mechanical monstrosities appeal to peoples' baser instincts and pollutes the very civic environment around them. It makes them toters and strappers and car fondlers. Those who drive big cars are compensating for something, unless they are women, in which case they are merely repressed and forced into it by brutal misogynistic paternalism.
You've been deleteing your memos again, haven't you, Comrade Party? And it seems you've been missing the group-think strategy meetings, I haven't seen your name on the sign-in logs for quite a while. Come, drink this tasty fruit-flavored beverage and we will re-educate you.
Common Sense Party
(14,139 posts)It's either a phobia or some sort of Freudian phallic inadequacy. I haven't figured out which.
Mmm! This stuff is tasty! Is this lime?
PavePusher
(15,374 posts)A Totee!
OMGZ!!!
shadowrider
(4,941 posts)Pacafishmate
(249 posts)Ban everything that could ever potentially hurt anyone.