CrossPosting With No Comment

[Tuesday Afternoon]

http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1240&pid=105291

[gejohnston]

1. Some people are too sophmoric

to have access to a keyboard let alone a gun.

[Tuesday Afternoon]

2. point taken. --

better a keyboard than a gun, amen.

I told DanTex I would point out these tactics when I saw them and asked him to do the same for me when he saw them coming from a 2A poster.

Kind of wish now that I had made a bet as to who would rack up the most in a certain amount of time.

Tactics like this in some groups would not be tolerated. I know we have thicker skin in here but, it is keeping the rest of DU from participating and confusing Jurors on how to adjudicate post in this group. I seek to edify DU.....

Thanks for commenting.

[ileus]

3. It's the whole Progressive, progressive, Democrat or democrat shtick

These people believe that anyone who supports the 2A is an idiot, too stupid to be a true democrat so they have to be a troll.

[Tuesday Afternoon]

4. and the other side of the coin

I see it as incendiary flamebait and disruptive and trollish behavior on their part....also the condescending passive aggressive tone is NOT conducive to civil discourse.

[ileus]

5. we used to have one troll where their main goal was getting people shitcanned.

[Tuesday Afternoon]

6. I wonder how many of those were legitimate and how many were just so infuriated

beyond their limit and Baited into saying things they regretted.

[ileus]

7. Basically all the ones I read they were intentionally baited...it's easy to exploit

someones weakness if you've spent enough time to learn them. Bait them here, then there, wait a few days bait them again...then pick the right time and spring the trap.

And giggle like a school girl when one of your enemies are baited enough to where you're whining gets them canned.

[Tuesday Afternoon]

8. One way to keep the rhetoric going and keep Dems in rural red states from being elected.

[gejohnston]

9. this person wouldn't

happen to have their own one-sided rant website now, wouldn't they?

[oneshooter]

11. Don't be. She doesn't like anybody.

[ileus]

13. Were you really? Really??

I can't imagine anything else...

[ileus]

15. Here's the funniest shit ever...Snork PeRsonIFieD!

Was a constant fixture in flame wars in that forum. Repeated attempts to badger the Admins into banning people via the alert function. Constantly surly and rude, asshat had become pretty much the epitome of "making DU suck." She received an enormous amount of feedback from other DUers indicating that she was disruptive and divisive and was given ample opportunity to modify her approach, but instead chose to believe that the problem was everybody else on DU.

[Electric Monk]

16. That's really funny, since you only registered here 4 days *after* iverglas was banned.

[gejohnston]

17. which means

she still reads DU.

[Tuesday Afternoon]

18. confusion over why that post was hidden or even alerted ....

what was SO wrong with what he said? He is a Noob, so what? OF course she is reading here and posting there. EVERYONE KNOWS THAT.

[gejohnston]

21. same here, which begs the question

but I'm guessing we will never see an explanation.

[Tuesday Afternoon]

22. Maybe someone will see fit to share the jury results...

and people wonder why people self delete.

I don't blame the dude.

[petronius]

26. Perhaps SGMRTDARMY will post them in meta, or otherwise share them

I'd be curious to see that alert message - I'm hard-pressed to imagine any legitimate reason to alert that post.

Ideally, the alerter would step up and explain, but I doubt that will happen...

[Electric Monk]

27. 5-1

COMMENTS:

Returning zombie. He's talking about a previous incarnation of his, under a different username. This current account only registered here 4 days AFTER iverglas was banned.

Please hide so it goes to MIRT.

A randomly-selected Jury of DU members completed their review of this alert at Sun Jun 3, 2012, 09:38 PM, and voted 5-1 to HIDE IT.

Juror #1 voted to HIDE IT and said: No explanation given
Juror #2 voted to HIDE IT and said: MIRT should evaluate this.
Juror #3 voted to HIDE IT and said: I'm giving the Alerter the benefit of the doubt here. But how would most people... errr, jurors know if this poster is a returning zombie or whatever? Or just a low post count newbie slated to become another notch on some "professional troll hunter's" mouse?
Juror #4 voted to HIDE IT and said: No explanation given
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: No explanation given
Juror #6 voted to HIDE IT and said: You smell like a dirty sock.

[petronius]

28. So you alerted? Are you reconsidering now?

In all honesty, I think troll-hunting is a bigger blight on this website than 99% of trolls ever manage to be - the constant peering at low-post-count or unconventional posters is creepily authoritarian and can only chill the conversation...

[Tuesday Afternoon]

32. if I may say it a little more succinctly:

it makes DU suck....

[Clames]

34. Bad alert.

Looks like somebody needs to replace the batteries in their crystal ball before thinking about touching the Alert Button again...

[Tuesday Afternoon]

35. Bad Alert and Terrible Jury Service and The Alerter owes an apology to the aggrieved.

[Electric Monk]

36. I was mistaken about 1 detail, but my impression that they are a returner remains.

Not that they're the only returning zombie here in the gungeon. I'd even posit most of iverglas' "gungeon fanclub" are such fans precisely because they've been served pizza a la iverglas, often more than once.

[gejohnston]

38. based on what?

unless you can recognize the writing style and words used. That is how we busted a zombie anti Loudly, who was pretty obvious to everyone they were a reincarnation of Sharesunited
Like I told you before, simply knowing about individuals or conversations before registration only indicates he or she read the forums before registering.
By your logic, the fact that I read "Top Ten Conservative Idiots" and might remember the content before my registration would make me Lazarus too. I read DU for a couple of years before registering.

I'd even posit most of iverglas' "gungeon fanclub" are such fans precisely because they've been served pizza a la iverglas, often more than once.

Please do and show evidence to back it up. You maybe right, I have no idea. I actually don't care.
http://www.trutv.com/library/crime/criminal_mind/forensics/literary/1.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forensic_linguistics

[Electric Monk]

20. I've been reading her blog too, and haven't seen mention of "SGMRTDARMY"

She has mentioned plenty of usernames of DUers she's fought with, but that's not one of them.

[gejohnston]

23. here

http://feministshosts.boardhost.com/viewtopic.php?id=30

Too many damn Dans in the Guns forum these days anyhow. Grounds enough for tombstoning. Would be for Wee Willie Winkie, anyhow! Let it never be said that he doesn't embrace the arbitrary exercise of power.

Lotsa gun trolls in that thread.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/117240769

I know: duh. At least newbie SGMRTDARMY (dare I add: BBQ) isn't a Dan.
PavePusher and DonP, those inveterate veterans of all the best right-wing sewers of the internet (use the search box on the General Discussion page here, folks), still stinking up DU. Where's Willie when you need him???

BTW, knowing about events and people before registering is not evidence or proof of previous membership. It only means the individual read it before registering, just as iverglas is now.

[Electric Monk]

25. Ok, I stand corrected re: iverglas & SGMRTDARMY.

If there's one thing I think everyone can agree on, re: iverglas, it's that she's quite verbose.

[PavePusher]

29. Every time she posts my name...

I'm gonna go buy some range ammo.

Bless her heart....

[gejohnston]

30. I'll see your range ammo and raise you

a few bucks to the NFA
http://www.nfa.ca/

While we are at it, a couple of bucks to Canada Carry for each time she bad mouths DU.
http://canadacarry.org

[DonP]

40. It is comforting to know ...

... we were apparently a long term and continuing burr under her saddle.

I like the idea of buying more ammo, but I generally don't need an excuse for that or picking up another unusual or hard to find .22 rifle.

[Common Sense Party]

33. "still reads DU"??? Correction: It appears that she still lives, breathes, dreams,

bleeds and shits DU. Talk about obsessive and narcissistic.

At least now she doesn't have to hear us lesser mortals argue back, and she can try to appear as correct and infallible as she thinks she actually is.

[Atypical Liberal]

37. Link?

Which web site?

[gejohnston]

39. this one.

http://feministshosts.boardhost.com/viewforum.php?id=1

[Atypical Liberal]

41. LOL

Man, am I not sorry to see this person go. I gather from the admin comment on her transparency page that she gave up on the guns forum and instead went on to disrupt the feminism forum.

[PavePusher]

19. Who says they regretted?

Speaking truth to... dickishness... is an honor, not anything to ever regret.

Just do it with flair.

"When death is inevitable, style counts."

[Tuesday Afternoon]

24. point taken.

[AtheistCrusader]

31. I'm going to say his troll example was so good, he actually trolled a bunch of people in the process

of making a simple example.

Wasn't worth responding to.