Gun Control & RKBA
Related: About this forumGirl's family to sue over shooting at Bremerton school
The claim filed by Amina Kocer-Bowman's family alleges that officials at Armin Jahr Elementary School were aware the boy had been acting out, should have known he had talked about bringing a gun to school and should have intervened.
The lawsuit, filed in Kitsap County Superior Court, claims the boy's uncle, father, mother and the mother's boyfriend were all negligent in allowing the child to have access to the firearm.
"Children model and mimic the behavior of their parents.... ," said the Bowman's attorney, Jeff Campiche. "We have brought suit against them because they entrusted firearms to a child and also let this child believe that the .45-caliber handgun is appropriate protection against bullying at the school."
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2018926012_schoolshooting16m.html
xchrom
(108,903 posts)jerseyjack
(1,361 posts)ileus
(15,396 posts)On another note, I hope the family wins.
Safety first.
How in the world is the NRA responsible? Or are you another one of those NRA haters?
Tuesday Afternoon
(56,912 posts)Fuck 'em all including and notwithstanding the NRA. Fucking leeches every goddamn one of them.
Jenoch
(7,720 posts)negligent in this situation. The kid should not have had access to this gun. This situation in no way is the fault of the NRA. The NRA advocates for safe gun use, not letting them lay around so children have access.
I have a problem with the story.
"Amina was wounded when the .45-caliber handgun discharged while it was in the backpack of the 9-year-old boy on Feb. 22 at Armin Jahr Elementary School."
Uhm, no, the gun did not spontaneously discharge when it "was in the backpack".
ManiacJoe
(10,136 posts)The backpack was dropped on the floor. The gun had nothing protecting the trigger; something in the bag entered the trigger guard and pressed the trigger.
Tuesday Afternoon
(56,912 posts)Kaleva
(36,336 posts)The above was in reference to the lawsuit against the school district. I don't know how they could have reasonable been expected to know but the district has insurance for these kind of things and will probably settle out of court as it'd be cheaper to do that then fight it in court.
As for the lawsuit against the boy's family, I think that is valid but one can't get blood out of a turnip.
pipoman
(16,038 posts)Hoyt
(54,770 posts)who don't want to impede access to their guns.
Tuesday Afternoon
(56,912 posts)I am all ears . . . .
rl6214
(8,142 posts)And what's your excuse? Why did YOU become a robber?
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)at home.
rl6214
(8,142 posts)"As a former robber, I locked the door to keep people out, especially police."
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1172&pid=45338
it is against the law to let children have access to guns. The guns legally must be locked up separately from the ammunition. If that law was in effect in this case, the family obviously would have broken the law. What specific law would you like to see that would have prevented this situation?
aikoaiko
(34,183 posts)I understand the parents' anger, but anger does not mean someone else was negligent.
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)likely to emulate "role models " around them.
aikoaiko
(34,183 posts)I know that is the claim, but I thought the facts of the case were still dispute.
But let me make clear to you that I support the prosecution of those who are criminally negligent and support civil remedies when appropriate.
rl6214
(8,142 posts)Something should be done to stop all the frivolous law suits. This one won't go anywhere but cost the school district and the county a lot of money.