Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

SecularMotion

(7,981 posts)
Wed Sep 26, 2012, 06:47 AM Sep 2012

Remington liability case documents opened up to public

A federal district court ruled Tuesday that the public should have access to sealed court documents in a product liability case involving one of the largest rifle manufacturers in the world.

The ruling comes in Aleksich vs. Remington, a 1991 case involving an incident where a Butte teenager was wounded in a discharge of a Model 700 rifle.

A California law firm sought access to the documents on behalf of Richard Barber of Manhattan, whose 9-year-old son, Gus, was killed when the family's Model 700 rifle misfired after a family hunting trip.

Through years of pain-staking research, Barber says design defects cause the rifle to fire without anyone pulling the trigger.

http://www.ktvq.com/news/remington-liability-case-documents-opened-up-to-public/
12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Remington liability case documents opened up to public (Original Post) SecularMotion Sep 2012 OP
clean your bolt, you'll never have a problem. ileus Sep 2012 #1
Honest, Officer ... holdencaufield Sep 2012 #2
If it was a design defect - Don't you think that Remington would have sent out a notice about it? socialindependocrat Sep 2012 #3
LOL @ "pain-staking" slackmaster Sep 2012 #4
Over a milion of those have been made. GreenStormCloud Sep 2012 #5
Its just (IMHO) to set a precedence Missycim Sep 2012 #6
You may be right. I wonder who is funding the suit? N/T GreenStormCloud Sep 2012 #9
If you abuse or neglect equipment hard enough it can malfunction. Remmah2 Sep 2012 #7
"[Most] people blunder through life wondering what the hell happened." Callisto32 Sep 2012 #12
Official Remington Response Remmah2 Sep 2012 #8
Interesting video which I might question ... spin Sep 2012 #10
This happened to me once. Callisto32 Sep 2012 #11

socialindependocrat

(1,372 posts)
3. If it was a design defect - Don't you think that Remington would have sent out a notice about it?
Wed Sep 26, 2012, 07:17 AM
Sep 2012

Why were the court records sealed? What's the secret?

I know, read the rest of the article.

I'll be back....

 

slackmaster

(60,567 posts)
4. LOL @ "pain-staking"
Wed Sep 26, 2012, 09:12 AM
Sep 2012

painstaking

1pains·tak·ing

noun \ˈpān-ˌstā-kiŋ\
Definition of PAINSTAKING
: the action of taking pains : diligent care and effort
First Known Use of PAINSTAKING
1538
Rhymes with PAINSTAKING
backbreaking, bookmaking, breathtaking, caretaking, dressmaking, earthshaking, filmmaking, glassmaking, groundbreaking, heartbreaking, hou...

2painstaking

adjective
Definition of PAINSTAKING
: taking pains : expending, showing, or involving diligent care and effort
— pains·tak·ing·ly adverb
See painstaking defined for English-language learners »
See painstaking defined for kids »
Examples of PAINSTAKING

The book describes the election process in painstaking detail.
<she was always painstaking about her work>

First Known Use of PAINSTAKING
1696
Related to PAINSTAKING
Synonyms: careful, conscientious, fussy, loving, meticulous, scrupulous
Antonyms: careless

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/painstaking

A California law firm sought access to the documents on behalf of Richard Barber of Manhattan, whose 9-year-old son, Gus, was killed when the family's Model 700 rifle misfired after a family hunting trip.

Maybe Mr. Barber should have unloaded his rifle after the hunt was over.

Another example of why basic gun safety should be taught in public schools.

GreenStormCloud

(12,072 posts)
5. Over a milion of those have been made.
Wed Sep 26, 2012, 09:32 AM
Sep 2012

Last edited Wed Sep 26, 2012, 11:20 AM - Edit history (1)

The Army used it as a sniper rifle in Vietnam. Now, after all those rifles and all those years someone claims there is a design defect? Why didn't it show up decades ago?

 

Missycim

(950 posts)
6. Its just (IMHO) to set a precedence
Wed Sep 26, 2012, 09:41 AM
Sep 2012

so control freaks can sue some more and more and more, until what the couldn't do in the legislatures can be done in the courts.

 

Remmah2

(3,291 posts)
7. If you abuse or neglect equipment hard enough it can malfunction.
Wed Sep 26, 2012, 10:31 AM
Sep 2012

The wild card is the owner. Many people I know don't mantain their cars, chainsaws, power tools, houses, firearms, lawnmowers, garage door openers, yet the equipment is "junk" if it malfunctions.

Some people blunder through life wondering what the hell happened.

spin

(17,493 posts)
10. Interesting video which I might question ...
Wed Sep 26, 2012, 04:09 PM
Sep 2012

except for the fact that the media has a long history of distorting the facts about firearms.

Callisto32

(2,997 posts)
11. This happened to me once.
Wed Sep 26, 2012, 04:18 PM
Sep 2012

I was firing a friends 700 in 6mm, a wonderful shooter it was. Then it fired upon closing the bolt, this was the 3rd shot on a clean bolt assembly. We put that particular rifle away for the rest of the day. I don't think we ever really talked about it again, and I lost touch with the fellow, but it definitely does happen.

That said, design defect is a bit much to conclude. Millions (I think) of those things exist, and as with any machine a certain rate of failure is to be expected.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»Remington liability case ...