Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Gun Control & RKBA
Related: About this forumGuns don't need more protection in Louisiana
Unless voters approve an amendment to the state Constitution next month, one day legislators could make it illegal to carry concealed weapons anywhere. That's what the gun lobby says, so of course it's not true. To a rational citizenry the idea might not be so alarming anyway, but the NRA has inculcated the notion that the slightest attempt to curb the proliferation of firearms is an assault on liberty. Gun makers and dealers have been transformed into constitutional guarantors. The slaughter and mayhem that leave the rest of the civilized world aghast are a price we are prepared to pay.
So the amendment on next month's ballot must be rated a cinch to pass. It was drafted on the manifestly insane pretext that the Second Amendment and the current state Constitution fail to provide adequate protection for gun owners.
The Louisiana Constitution now states: "The right to keep and bear arms shall not be abridged, but this provision shall not prevent the passage of laws to prohibit the carrying of weapons concealed on the person."
That one caveat is a reasonable concession to the cause of public safety, and the Legislature has duly banned concealed weapons from such places as schools, jails, bars, polling stations and airports. They are also verboten in the state Capitol, which just goes to show that legislators are not as dumb as you think.
http://www.nola.com/opinions/index.ssf/2012/10/guns_dont_need_more_protection.html
So the amendment on next month's ballot must be rated a cinch to pass. It was drafted on the manifestly insane pretext that the Second Amendment and the current state Constitution fail to provide adequate protection for gun owners.
The Louisiana Constitution now states: "The right to keep and bear arms shall not be abridged, but this provision shall not prevent the passage of laws to prohibit the carrying of weapons concealed on the person."
That one caveat is a reasonable concession to the cause of public safety, and the Legislature has duly banned concealed weapons from such places as schools, jails, bars, polling stations and airports. They are also verboten in the state Capitol, which just goes to show that legislators are not as dumb as you think.
http://www.nola.com/opinions/index.ssf/2012/10/guns_dont_need_more_protection.html
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
11 replies, 1698 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (0)
ReplyReply to this post
11 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Guns don't need more protection in Louisiana (Original Post)
SecularMotion
Oct 2012
OP
How is this a NRA/gun lobby/industry conspracy if the voters of Louisiana are making the choice?
trouble.smith
Oct 2012
#5
It seems SM wants the voters listened to *only* if they agree with him:
friendly_iconoclast
Oct 2012
#9
holdencaufield
(2,927 posts)1. Wow!
An entire post with out pimping your blog. Did it hurt?
glacierbay
(2,477 posts)2. Ummmm
I think your referring to MikeB302000, he's the one always pimping his crappy little blog.
holdencaufield
(2,927 posts)3. My Bad ...
... mis-identified my trolls.
Going back to my Troll Recognition flash cards.
rl6214
(8,142 posts)11. Make sure you take notes...
This trollish behavior goes along with posting google dumps and leaving no commentary at all. MikeB on the other hand leaves plenty of his warped commentary, along with numerous links to his warped blog.
GreenStormCloud
(12,072 posts)4. How about letting the voters decide? N/T
trouble.smith
(374 posts)5. How is this a NRA/gun lobby/industry conspracy if the voters of Louisiana are making the choice?
It's their constitution and their decision.
friendly_iconoclast
(15,333 posts)9. It seems SM wants the voters listened to *only* if they agree with him:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/117271217
http://www.democraticunderground.com/117274737
http://www.democraticunderground.com/117274614
There are more, but those give the gist of it...
http://www.democraticunderground.com/117274737
http://www.democraticunderground.com/117274614
Speak up, Democrats, on gun control
There are more, but those give the gist of it...
ileus
(15,396 posts)6. You are correct Firearm owners need protected in Louisiana.
Guns only have two enemies, they're pretty tough by themselves. Weather isn't much of a threat, fire isn't their best friend but some can survive.
guardian
(2,282 posts)7. I wouldn't be surprised if the law is a direct response to
incidents like this
which show the fascist mindset of the typical anti-gun zealot
Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)8. If you oppose popular amendments, say so.nt
Clames
(2,038 posts)10. Good for the state.
Have lots of friends and family there. My father and brother are taking their CCW course on the 16th.