Gun Control & RKBA
Related: About this forumMississippi gun shop selling ‘Charlie Rangel’ assault rifle; AK-style weapon ‘loves the green’
Mississippi Auto Arms, a shop in Oxford that specializes in combat weapons, is hawking the 11-pound "Charlie Rangel Edition" Kalashnikov-style rifle for a hefty $1,195.
"Congressman Rangel's record of personal disdain for the people of Mississippi and the rights of firearms owners is clear," Nathan Yow, a local lawyer who owns the gun store, told the Daily News in an e-mail. "In my view the Congressman should expect to see his record lampooned, criticized or otherwise subjected to political satire."
"Like Rangel, this little Suchka AK rifle loves the green," a description on the shop's website says, an apparent potshot at Rangel's ethics woes.
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/mississippi-gun-shop-sells-charlie-rangel-assault-rifle-article-1.1187725#ixzz29qieeJWH
holdencaufield
(2,927 posts)... The USS Jimmy Carter.
fightthegoodfightnow
(7,042 posts)What a ridiculous comparison.
Jimmy Carter served with honor in the Navy and as President and naming a carrier that defends our country brings honor to him.
Was that the intention here with the Rangel gun?
glacierbay
(2,477 posts)He said an attack sub, those go underwater, a carrier is above water carrying aircraft.
Here's a question, do you know the difference between an SSN and a SSBN?
fightthegoodfightnow
(7,042 posts)That's your point....it was a sub and not a carrier....really?
Either way, do you know the difference between honor and ridicule?
glacierbay
(2,477 posts)I know he served with Honor in the Navy aboard an Attack Submarine.
This is the Boat he served on.
The USS Pomfret
SS-391
This is the Boat named for him.
The USS Jimmy Carter
SSN-23
Hell of a difference between then and now.
Remmah2
(3,291 posts)The anti-gun crown parrots inaccurate facts and is not interested in the truth when presented. Several anti-gun people I work with have changed their minds once they understood the facts. It's taken years but their minds have been opened. It's not like they're going to run out and buy firearms but they've learned to seriously scrutinize politicians who abuse gun owners for their political gain.
This is also why the local Democrat politicians are not rabid when it comes to gun issues.
Others are like sewers with the manhole covers welded in place.
At Sun Oct 21, 2012, 01:54 PM you sent an alert on the following post:
Actually it points out the problem of discussing gun control with anti gun personalities.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1172&pid=81048
REASON FOR ALERT:
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate. (See <a href="http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=aboutus#communitystandards" target="_blank">Community Standards</a>.)
YOUR COMMENTS:
Some "anti-gun people...are like sewers with the manhole covers welded in place." Over-the-top. Should we all just start calling each other names?
JURY RESULTS
A randomly-selected Jury of DU members completed their review of this alert at Sun Oct 21, 2012, 02:02 PM, and voted 2-4 to LEAVE IT ALONE.
Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: While I am a very strong gun control advocate I believe the posters childish insults are just part and parcel of "discourse" here. But, proving he's "tough" is also part and parcel of gun freaks mindsets.
Juror #2 voted to HIDE IT and said: No explanation given
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: Using an analogy is not the same thing as calling each other names.
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: I might have phrased it a little differently, but the post is relatively accurate in its assessment.
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: An unpleasant metaphor, but not over the top at all. I see DUers call each other much worse, every single day. This is mild.
Juror #6 voted to HIDE IT and said: on reflection, agree with the alerter, calling people sewers is over the top
Thank you.
gejohnston
(17,502 posts)"mind like a steel trap"? or simply "don't care about facts, I already made up my mind."
oneshooter
(8,614 posts)ProgressiveProfessor
(22,144 posts)That he is willing to alert such things speaks volumes about the weakness of his positions and his overall insecurities
No Aloha or Imua for this one
Clames
(2,038 posts)That particular poster does little else in this group now. Pretty childish really.
Remmah2
(3,291 posts)Pluck em.
Remmah2
(3,291 posts)You and the horse you rode in on.
virginia mountainman
(5,046 posts)People that make wildly inaccurate statements, and then down play it when pointed out, only expose how LITTLE they know about the subject at hand.
This is how we win. It is much easier when knowledge and FACTS are on our side.
fightthegoodfightnow
(7,042 posts)The problem with the ....how did you say it.....'personalities' of gun clutching crowd is that they often don't want to talk about guns.
His post differentiating subs and carriers was off topic.
oneshooter
(8,614 posts)fightthegoodfightnow
(7,042 posts)Group think....from the gun clutchers.....who don't want to talk about gun violence.
oneshooter
(8,614 posts)fightthegoodfightnow
(7,042 posts)What would that be?
Clames
(2,038 posts)Might even call Ripley.
fightthegoodfightnow
(7,042 posts)Just your apparent dislike for my posts without any content regarding guns.
oneshooter
(8,614 posts)Clames
(2,038 posts)...and do everything but discuss guns in any sensible manner. Keep it up by all means and hope Hoyt holds the door open for you...
fightthegoodfightnow
(7,042 posts)What a surprise- You really think you advance your cause by banning, alerting, or silencing those who disagree with you.
Please give me a worthy gun adversary who isn't so small and petty.
gejohnston
(17,502 posts)trying to ban us?
Hoyt as a rally cry? Seriously? He is your Ted Nugent who did your cause more harm than good. Some of his rants made him look like a racist. Perhaps you can pick someone who doesn't excuse machine gunning children.
fightthegoodfightnow
(7,042 posts)This forum has far more supporters who articulate your views (albeit mostly with disdain and dislike rather than serious discourse or argument).
Hoyt was kicked out of this forum....and I object to ANYONE being 'group gang banged' out of any forum by bullies who constantly alert posts REGARDLESS of how offensive or objectionable their posts are. I responded to someone who implied I was destined to being banned like Hoyt. How petty and small. I am not Hoyt but I'll defend his right to express his views regardless of how offensive or how much I disagree with them. I didn't read all of his posts, but be assured I suspect I know what offended most in this forum and it most certainly had nothing to do with race.
There was one poster on this forum who I vehemently disagreed with but when I sat on a jury, I supported him if not his post regarding guns. I seriously doubt that most on this group think forum would do the same for me.
gejohnston
(17,502 posts)I never alerted on any anti. I did alert on what I thought was a right winger once. The only thing that offended me about Hoyt was his excusing cops shooting some kids in the back, while comparing someone getting his head bashed in at a gas station with Bull Conner. Other than that, the more he ran his mouth it made his cause look bad. Look at it this way, I'm guessing Sarah Brady gets giddy while I cringe everytime Wayne and Ted say something stupid.
I never sat on a "gun" jury. All of mine were in either Meta or GD.
fightthegoodfightnow
(7,042 posts)I suspect if what you say is true (and I have no reason to doubt), I suspect he has much in common with many whose posts remain.
fightthegoodfightnow
(7,042 posts)...oh and I just caught your Meta reference and I have NO idea what the f£ck you are talking about.
Clames
(2,038 posts)You, ellisonz, and a few others carry that mantle. Give you a worthy adversary? Why don't you try and earn one by being less ignorant and resentful of gun owners. Too much to ask for? Not surprised.
fightthegoodfightnow
(7,042 posts)How Many Alerts Do You Attribute To Me? Please do show your 'ignorance'....I've made NONE against you or anyone on this forum that I recall.
I have LONG been an advocate of defending the right of ANYONE to post ANY post regardless of how offensive or objectionable or even in violation of TOS. I simply think alerts are silly. I've been on dozens of juries and with few exceptions my free speech advocacy has been affirmed by most juries.
You seem to think I am 'ignorant' (nice) without offering any substantive or articulate argument to support your claim regarding guns. I'll leave others to discern who is 'ignorant.'
Clames
(2,038 posts)I have absolutely no reason to believe anything you say regarding your alerting habits or jury activities. Talk is cheap. You have shown more than a little derision towards gun owners here and seem to be incapable of sustaining a civil discussion without mashing your caps lock button and hollering about non-existent TOS violations (so much for your free speech advocacy ). You have a demonstrated lack of technical and legal understanding of firearms as it relates to the SOP of this group. Pretty much leaves little doubt to who is "ignorant"...
fightthegoodfightnow
(7,042 posts)You don't know jack about me. Your posts are nothing if not entertaining.
You have demonstrated a complete disregard for the consequences on human life caused by the gun policies you advocate. It's apparent that rather than talk about guns, you get a great sense of satisfaction out of calling me ignorant and telling me how much you could care less about what I think even though you reply to so many of my posts. It's amusing. You say 'talk is cheap.' You should know. Ignore my posts if you could care less about what I think regarding guns.
fightthegoodfightnow
(7,042 posts)Group think....from the gun clutchers.....who don't want to talk about gun violence.
gejohnston
(17,502 posts)DC, Chicago, and USVI doesn't seem to have it.
fightthegoodfightnow
(7,042 posts)Because the community needs of DC and Chicago are soooooo much like Rock Springs, Wyoming and Citrus County, Florida.
NOT.
gejohnston
(17,502 posts)just saying theater does nothing. Do you seriously think city hall gives a shit about the neighborhood by Bolling AFB as they do Georgetown?
fightthegoodfightnow
(7,042 posts)Different jurisdictions.....one is in a state....one is in a city and neither have anything to do with each other.
gejohnston
(17,502 posts)the whole time. Bolling is in DC. The main gate is at the end of Malcolm X ave. Are you thinking of Andrews? I was there before the merger.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joint_Base_Anacostia-Bolling
fightthegoodfightnow
(7,042 posts)Maryland
gejohnston
(17,502 posts)not the same place.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joint_Base_Anacostia-Bolling
fightthegoodfightnow
(7,042 posts)My point of reference is exits on the beltway. My apologies.
I suspect that the city views the area around Bolling like any other part of the city. Of course, gun violence may be higher around this military base than Georgetown, but that says more about the the concentration of guns in the area than the lack of guns in Georgetown.
gejohnston
(17,502 posts)even if most of the folks in the bar looked at me like I was from Mars. It isn't the number of guns, it is who has the guns. In the 1950s-1970s, knife violence would be the problem. For some reason, before Nixon's WOD, gangs used switchblades and tire chains and rarely used guns even though they were more accessible then than now. I wonder if any social scientist ever researched why. I think that would be worth reading. Probably meaningless from a policy stand point, but would be interesting.
fightthegoodfightnow
(7,042 posts)....but let me ask you this...and then off to bed (LOL).....who had the guns if it's not the number of guns?
gejohnston
(17,502 posts)the point is, if the gangsters have the guns, they shoot each other (and innocents because of their lack of skill) instead of stab each other. If that same number of guns were all in the hands of law abiding residents of the area, for what ever reason, then the gun violence would be nil. The trigger doesn't pull the finger.
fightthegoodfightnow
(7,042 posts)I disagree.
When you say they shoot each other who are you referring to? Gun owners?
gejohnston
(17,502 posts)gun owners, but I'm guessing many of the guns are "community guns", a practice that dates back to the 19th century, that are property of the gang.
If you think the trigger pulls the finger, by no means take up shooting.
Clames
(2,038 posts)Anti-gunners neither think nor do they seem to form effective, cohesive groups that get anything done. I'm fine with that because that means ineffective and poorly conceived "feel good" laws that do nothing to affect criminals don't get passed. You are a shining example of the "all talk, no walk" paradigm that represents most anti-gun advocacy.
Remmah2
(3,291 posts)Some day it'll sink in.
fightthegoodfightnow
(7,042 posts)Group think....from the gun clutches.....who don't want to talk about gun violence.
Remmah2
(3,291 posts)It's not "gun violence"; it's ALL violence and the underlying social problems that enable violence. I don't think anti-gun people comprehend complex social problems. Some peoples problem solving skills never evolved past junior high school.
fightthegoodfightnow
(7,042 posts)You write
Here's what I think
Such is the level of discourse worthy for your post.
holdencaufield
(2,927 posts)Ew! Ew! I do!
glacierbay
(2,477 posts)what is it? LOL.
Trunk Monkey
(950 posts)IMO naming one of those after President Carter would be an afront
gejohnston
(17,502 posts)Last edited Sun Oct 21, 2012, 02:03 AM - Edit history (1)
but the USS Jimmy Carter is a submarine. President Carter was Navy.
rl6214
(8,142 posts)It says in the post that it's A SUBMARINE...
Trunk Monkey
(950 posts)But the man did serve with honor and (IMO) has done more as a humanitarian since he left office than any other US President to date.
gejohnston
(17,502 posts)Some years ago, Robert Gates was on CSPAN's Washington Journal, a caller asked him if his experience matched conventional wisdom. IIRC, he said Ford and Carter were two of the most under rated presidents and that Reagan's administration "lacked intellectual heavyweights". I happen to agree.
Trunk Monkey
(950 posts)Is his tireless work for Habitat for Humanity
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Habitat_for_Humanity#Jimmy_.26_Rosalynn_Carter_Work_Project
In 2008 Habitat for Humanity celebrated the 25th annual building project with the Carters and renamed it to include Mrs. Carter. The Jimmy & Rosalynn Carter Work Project focused on supporting the Gulf Coast community seeking to rebuild after hurricanes Katrina and Rita. Despite periodic downpours, volunteers got most of the work done during one week in June to finish building and fixing 60 houses and frame 48 more.[19]
In November 2009 volunteers joined Jimmy and Rosalynn Carter in the Mekong River region of Southeast Asia. Houses were built in the countries of Vietnam, Cambodia, Laos, Thailand and the Yunnan Province in China. The week-long project served nearly 166 families.[20] It also began a five-year Habitat for Humanity initiative to work with 50,000 families across the five countries.[20]
Everyone may not share his faith convictions but no one can tell me he doesn't put them into daily practice in his life.
AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)Remmah2
(3,291 posts)Former farmer goes hi tech.
GreenStormCloud
(12,072 posts)Rickover turned him down for nuclear submarines.
hack89
(39,171 posts)http://www.cartercenter.org/news/experts/jimmy_carter.html
GreenStormCloud
(12,072 posts)I apologize for the error.
hack89
(39,171 posts)Champion Jack
(5,378 posts)Decoy of Fenris
(1,954 posts)The junk they're trying to foist off as a Kalashnikov. I'd have to see the internal workings, and it looks like a fine gun, but that's a Kalashnikov in name only otherwise. Plus, green? Awful color.
repiblikensouse
(23 posts)shorter barrel with the flash hider, it looks a lot like my $400 Romanian, which, as you point out, might not be a true Kalashnikov. At any rate, though, it appears that the gun place is trying to find suckers who will pay $1200 for a $600 dollar rifle.
fightthegoodfightnow
(7,042 posts)Really sick, disgusting, offensive, and pathetic.
I suspect the gun pun will backfire.
What next....bullets named after politicians?
Reminds me of Sarah Palin's disgusting target ads.
glacierbay
(2,477 posts)I think it's kinda funny given Charles Rangel's record on gun control. I wouldn't buy one but it's a great novelty piece.
Clames
(2,038 posts)Probably sell every one he makes and for a tidy profit.
fightthegoodfightnow
(7,042 posts)What do attribute to me that I 'suspect wrong'? I didn't suspect anything.
holdencaufield
(2,927 posts)Not the USUAL suspect, I agree
fightthegoodfightnow
(7,042 posts)We'll see.
Trunk Monkey
(950 posts)1200$ for an AK?
Pathetic
fightthegoodfightnow
(7,042 posts)It should be MUCH more!
gejohnston
(17,502 posts)The article implies the barrel is shorter than 16 inches, which means it is not regulated by the Gun Control Act or Brady Bill, so no NICS check. Before you freak, it will be regulated under the NFA, which means the background check will last about four months (depending on the backlog, the ATF has two guys doing nothing but NFA background checks) and restricted almost like a machine gun.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Firearms_Act
ProgressiveProfessor
(22,144 posts)Then again not many of the delicafe flowers has much of a sense of humor
Union Scribe
(7,099 posts)Backfire? Well now who's making gun puns?
Remmah2
(3,291 posts)Now that's funny.
slackmaster
(60,567 posts)PavePusher
(15,374 posts)SecularMotion
(7,981 posts)PavePusher
(15,374 posts)A labor of Sysiphus, I assure you.
Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)gejohnston
(17,502 posts)although I would use the type of rifle she carried. Know any custom engravers?
friendly_iconoclast
(15,333 posts)With a black stock, of course...
Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)GreenStormCloud
(12,072 posts)The more people that drop into his store, the more guns he will sell. He is getting a lot of free advertising by that gimmick.
drhobo
(74 posts)Mississippi Auto Arms is primary an online retailer so the internet fervor over this is certainly driving more web traffic their way. They are a fairly big retailer, I would guess they worked up and are selling a decent volume of these.
I bought my VEPR from them, shipped and was waiting at my local gun shop in three days.
ileus
(15,396 posts)ProgressiveProfessor
(22,144 posts)Indeed it already has
oneshooter
(8,614 posts)Imagine, a business selling firearms for a profit!!! It would set off on a 5-6 post rant.
ileus
(15,396 posts)4th law of robotics
(6,801 posts)how impolite.