Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Eugene

(61,819 posts)
Fri Sep 27, 2019, 07:30 AM Sep 2019

New York Times faces backlash after revealing details about whistleblower

Source: The Guardian

New York Times faces backlash after revealing details about whistleblower

National security experts and advocates for whistleblower protection condemn publication of identifying information

Maanvi Singh
Fri 27 Sep 2019 04.48 BST
Last modified on Fri 27 Sep 2019 07.01 BST

The New York Times is facing criticism over its decision to publish revealing details about the whistleblower whose explosive complaint, which raised concerns about Donald Trump’s conversation with the Ukrainian president and the White House’s apparent attempts to cover it up, was made public on Thursday.

Readers, including those who work with or within the intelligence community, national security experts and advocates for whistleblower protection, expressed concern that the decision compromised the individual’s safety.

The newspaper reported the whistleblower’s employer and expertise, citing three unnamed people familiar with the individual’s identity. Since the article’s publication online on Thursday, the newspaper has added the context that the White House already knew where the whistleblower was employed.

Identifying information published in the paper “recklessly narrows that universe of suspected whistleblowers to a very few people,” said Jesselyn Radack, the director of national security and human rights at the Whistleblower and Source Protection Program. “This has a very chilling effect on anyone who is even thinking of blowing the whistle and thinking of doing so through the proper channels.”

The individual is especially at risk given that Trump lashed out at those who informed the whistleblower, comparing them to spies, and alluded to retaliation. In audio obtained by the Los Angeles Times, Trump can be heard asking: “Who’s the person that gave the whistleblower the information? Because that’s close to a spy. You know what we used to do in the old days, when we were smart, right? The spies and treason? We used to handle it a little differently than we do now.”

-snip-


Read more: https://www.theguardian.com/media/2019/sep/26/new-york-times-trump-ukraine-whistleblower-published
3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
New York Times faces backlash after revealing details about whistleblower (Original Post) Eugene Sep 2019 OP
Completely Irresponsible On The Part Of The NYT.....nt global1 Sep 2019 #1
Good Sherman A1 Sep 2019 #2
Well-deserved backlash. Fire Dean Baquet sharedvalues Sep 2019 #3

Sherman A1

(38,958 posts)
2. Good
Fri Sep 27, 2019, 07:53 AM
Sep 2019

Last edited Fri Sep 27, 2019, 09:17 AM - Edit history (1)

It was very irresponsible of them to do so.

This is my email to them.

Gentlemen:
I was deeply disturbed by the actions of the NY Times to reveal identifying information regarding the Whistleblower in the Trump Whitehouse in regard to the recent revelations of his call to the Ukraine. This is an action I find to be exceptionally irresponsible and reprehensible on the part of your news organization. It is simply something that never should have occurred

I am not a subscriber, but if so I would certainly cancel my subscription to your paper and I have removed your news feed from my iPad News App. I will simply seek my information from news organizations that can be trusted to be responsible with sensitive information and their duty to inform the public. The NY Times has become little more than tabloid journalism.

Sincerely,

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Media»New York Times faces back...