Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
America’s Secret 4th Branch of Government: The NSA kept even Obama in the Dark
http://www.juancole.com/2013/10/americas-branch-government.htmlAmericas Secret 4th Branch of Government: The NSA kept even Obama in the Dark
Posted on 10/28/2013 by Juan Cole
The revelation from the Snowden Papers that the National Security Agency had German Chancellor Angela Merkels personal cell phone under surveillance has produced a central fallout. Dueling leaks over the international embarrassment have forced the White House to a key admission: President Barack Obama did not know what the NSA was up to.
Ever since the Snowden revelations of the massive, world-girdling extent of NSA electronic surveillance surfaced, I have been wondering two things: Did they tell Obama about it when they took office in 2009? And, do they have something on Obama?
Outgoing NSA head Keith Alexander or his circle leaked to German tabloid Bild am Sonntag that Alexander had told Obama about the tap on Merkels personal phone in 2010 and that Obama asked for more information on Merkel at that time.
DeutscheWelle reports:
That leak forced the White House (and the NSA) to deny the allegation and to see Alexander his leak and raise the ante.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
8 replies, 1572 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (3)
ReplyReply to this post
8 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
America’s Secret 4th Branch of Government: The NSA kept even Obama in the Dark (Original Post)
unhappycamper
Oct 2013
OP
So we DO have a Potemkin Government, just like the crazies have been saying all this time. nt
bemildred
Oct 2013
#3
It doesn't seem to be clear who is saying things, but in this case it's Juan Cole.
bemildred
Oct 2013
#6
KansDem
(28,498 posts)1. Well, if the President doesn't know about this evesdropping...
...then who the Hell is using the information?
Corporate espionage? CIA Black Ops? Who?
And with revelations such as this one (and many others), I find it difficult to believe 9/11 was a "complete surprise."
tblue37
(66,016 posts)4. The BFEE, perhaps, with its many ties to the CIA. nt
bemildred
(90,061 posts)3. So we DO have a Potemkin Government, just like the crazies have been saying all this time. nt
jakeXT
(10,575 posts)5. You mean like Russ Tice ?
Tice claimed that he held NSA wiretap orders targeting numerous members of the U.S. government, including one for a young senator from Illinois named Barack Obama.
"In the summer of 2004, one of the papers that I held in my hand was to wiretap a bunch of numbers associated with a forty-some-year-old senator from Illinois. You wouldn't happen to know where that guy lives now would you? It's a big White House in Washington D.C. That's who the NSA went after. That's the President of the United States now."
Tice added that he also saw orders to spy on Hillary Clinton, Senators John McCain and Diane Feinstein, then-Secretary of State Colin Powell, Gen. David Petraeus, and a current Supreme Court Justice.
Read more: http://www.businessinsider.com/the-nsa-spied-on-barack-obama-2004-russ-tice-2013-6
bemildred
(90,061 posts)6. It doesn't seem to be clear who is saying things, but in this case it's Juan Cole.
I haven't looked into Mr. Tice much, though he pops up now and then. There is a long list of Tices anyway, so its silly to focus on one.
jakeXT
(10,575 posts)7. Seems to be a very naive person. I only remember his position on Libya before the kinetic action /nt
bemildred
(90,061 posts)8. No, I wouldn't believe be anything just on Cole's say so.
He's not a reliable narrator, he a commentator. But he has things to say at times too. He speaks for a certain point of view, and coherently.
Most people are very naive. I can be very naive. So can you.