Interview with Jeremy Scahill Questions “War on Terror”
http://www.juancole.com/2013/12/interview-scahill-questions.html
Interview with Jeremy Scahill Questions War on Terror
By Juan Cole | Dec. 7, 2013
~snip~
AMY GOODMAN: saying theyre reforming or changing drone policy, than the six months before?
JEREMY SCAHILL: Right. I mean, thisits a lot of smoke and mirrors. I mean, you know, the drone czar, or the assassination czar, John Brennan, who now is the head of the CIA, you know, he worked very hard to create something called the disposition matrix, which basically is a program thats going to be used to determine who should be assassinated, who should we try to abduct, who should we try to render, who should wewhich terror suspects should we leave it up to local authorities in Yemen or Pakistan to try to deal with. And basically what Obama and his team have done in his second administration is to create an infrastructure for whoever happens to come into office next, whether theyre a Democrat or Republican, and they have ensured that this policy of pre-emptive warthats really what were talking about here. Itsthese are pre-emptive, pre-crime strikes, where the idea that we should even view terrorism as a law enforcement activity or terrorism as a crime is completely thrown away by the constitutional lawyer president. And so, what I think one of the major legacies of Obama is going to be on this front is that he has tried to put a stamp of legitimacy on what most countries around the world would claimyou know, plainly view as a global assassination program run by the empire, run by the most powerful nation on Earth.
JUAN GONZÁLEZ: I wanted to ask you about the situation in Afghanistan and the most recent drone strikes there, the impact on the continuing controversy over the status of forces agreement, whats going tohow the United States will stay in Afghanistan.
JEREMY SCAHILL: Right. I mean, well, as you know, I mean, the U.S. has propped up corrupt warlords, narcotraffickers, gangsters, for the past 12 years in Afghanistan. And, you know, the Taliban still control a large swath of territory, and they will, in perpetuity. And I thinkI mean, the question I think a lot of military families in the U.S. and in NATO countries have to ask is sort of whatwhat was the purpose of the past, you know, 12 years? I think a lot of nations understand the initial incursion into Afghanistan, under the argument that youre going to dismantle the al-Qaeda network that was responsible for 9/11. But what do you tell the families ofyou know, of soldiers that are going to be killed in the year leading up to the so-called withdrawal? I think what were going to see in Afghanistan is an asymmetric war thats going to continue on, where the United States continues to have special operations teams, theres going to be a very large CIA paramilitary presence, and I think that theyre going to try to present the veneer that its an Afghanization of the occupation, but in reality the U.S. strike forces will not be far away.