F-35 Contract May Be the Worst Deal the DOD Has Ever Made

[unhappycamper]

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/reese-schonfeld/f35-contractmay-be-the-wo_b_4400220.html


F-35 Contract May Be the Worst Deal the DOD Has Ever Made
Reese Schonfeld
Posted: 12/06/2013 5:05 pm

In June of 2013, Time magazine reported that the DOD will have spent $87.5 billion on R&D, Procurement and Initial Spare Parts on the F-35. It also reported that "there is a discernible trend in F-35 fabrication costs: they're clearly increasing." It adds that "Future years may prove even more costly: more stringent testing is still in the future and will not finish until 2019 at the earliest."

Worse news has just arrived. The DOD hopes that it may "eventually select one or multiple product support integrators (PSIs), lead contractors to assist the program office in F-35 sustainment." There is at least one more, perhaps unforeseen, problem. According to InsideDefense in a great piece of investigative reporting "F-35 PEO Says Program Fighting For Data Rights To Enable Comparison", "The government would have to own or have access to a large amount of proprietary data Lockheed and Pratt [Lockheed produces the F-35 airplane; Pratt manufacturers the jet's engine] have developed for the F-35.

Lt. Gen. Christopher Bodgan said that "little attention was paid to the F-35 data rights ownership issues until about 18 months ago and it is a high priority issue today." The "Pentagon and its lawyers are working with the JSF (Joint Strike Fighter) program's main industry participants to sort out data rights ownership questions, many of which remain unresolved."

Bodgan added "We have been working with the current contractors and we have been working with, unfortunately, lawyers who get involved in this too, and we're going to try to stake out what the government really has and what the government really doesn't have. That is not an easy question to answer."

[warrant46]

1. These will work well to bomb a few Mud Huts

Greedy industrialists feeding at the Public Trough

[madrchsod]

2. it`s pretty much a plane that will be obsolete in this centuries world war

[TRoN33]

3. I'm blaming it all on...

Lockheed Martin. They are notorious for known to lead the fight for legalized bribery - Lobbyists - in order to get everything going their ways. Some psychologists have concluded that somehow the name of Lockheed Martin to politicians/defense officers itself are as popular as McDonald's is to children, Lockheed's name are easily recognizable for corruption and not so loyal enough to America. I love F-22 but F-35 is so embarrassing. It doesn't stand a chance against Eurofighter Typhoon, Su-35 and T-50 Pak-Fa.

[unhappycamper]

4. Question: How much does the F-22 cost?

n/t