NSA leaks sink US business deals
http://atimes.com/atimes/China_Business/CBIZ-01-231213.htmlNSA leaks sink US business deals
By Andrew M Johnson
Dec 23, '13
~snip~
US tech titans face tough times in China
NSA spying has sent chills across the ranks of US technology companies operating abroad. From Brazil, Russia, and China to Germany and the Middle East, US tech giants are feeling the pain from a slimmed customer base and the prospect of new regulatory compliance costs that may squeeze profit margins.
(Indeed, that concern is expanding beyond information technology companies. Saab of Sweden this month won a US$4.5 billion order to supply 36 jet fighters to Brazil, beating Boeing of the United States for the deal, just a few weeks after President Dilma Rousseff said that alleged US spying on her government was an affront to her country.
"Boeing only didn't win the deal because of the lack of trust created by the spying incident, Welber Barral, Brazil's trade secretary from 2007 to 2011, told Bloomberg. "Had the decision been last year, Boeing would have won."
With over an 80% share of the non-US cloud-computing market, US companies have dominated the industry since its inception in the late 1990s. But a recent report published by the Washington-based Information Technology and Innovation Foundation (ITIF) estimates that the revenue losses facing US cloud providers will reach anywhere from $21 billion as a low estimate to $35 billion as a high estimate by 2016. [11] In addition to this report, the Cloud Security Alliance recently estimated that 10% of non-US companies have canceled their contracts with US-based providers since May. [12]
dipsydoodle
(42,239 posts)As most of the companies don't seem to pay much in the way of tax it affects their distributable profits. As such they should have tax credits to compensate.
Promethean
(468 posts)and not the offensive policies that are driving the foreign markets to distrust the US companies.
JHB
(37,160 posts)The problem isn't the leaking, it's the practice that the leaks were about.
RC
(25,592 posts)Edward Snowden's exposures couldn't have such an impact world wide.
To say it is the leaking that is the problem is nothing but propaganda and an attempt at damage control.
JoeyT
(6,785 posts)Don't do shit that will cause them to stop trusting you if they find out you're doing it. It's really not that complicated.
Now that their fuckups are costing some rich folks some money, we might actually see a policy change. Or at least they'll pretend to change policy and try to make sure it doesn't get out again.
Bosso 63
(992 posts)Pholus
(4,062 posts)from the original PNAC document:
"CONTROL THE NEW INTERNATIONAL COMMONS OF SPACE AND CYBERSPACE" (from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_for_the_New_American_Century)
It's where TIA got its genesis, and where the NSA picked up the duties when the code-words were reshuffled to make it look like TIA was closed down.
Why the f*ck did we decide to continue that crap?
JackInGreen
(2,975 posts)There, fixed that for you.
Fiendish Thingy
(15,624 posts)Which troubled the foreign Govts. Enough to cancel the contracts. Funny how a little 10% dent in corporate profits can create a groundswell of pressure from same corporations to change US policies and practices.
Thank You, Edward Snowden.
Scalded Nun
(1,236 posts)New policy is to ensure what they are doing NEVER sees light of day.
They see the leaks as what has hurt them, not their practices.
These evil bastards won't go any other route.