Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
House passes sweeping defense policy bill; measure's future is cloudy
Source: Reuters
Politics | Thu Oct 1, 2015 4:07pm EDT
House passes sweeping defense policy bill; measure's future is cloudy
WASHINGTON
The U.S. House of Representatives passed the $612 billion annual defense authorization bill on Thursday, but the measure's future was clouded by a dispute between Republicans and Democrats over government spending policy.
The House voted 270-156 to pass the National Defense Authorization Act, which sets spending policy for the Department of Defense but does not appropriate the funds. The vote was largely along party lines, with most Republicans favoring the bill and most Democrats opposing it.
The Senate is due to vote on the measure next week.
The White House said on Wednesday that President Barack Obama would veto the bill if it is passed in Congress because of the "irresponsible" way it boosts military spending.
The NDAA uses some $90 billion in discretionary funds meant for war spending, to allow the Pentagon to sidestep mandatory "sequestration" budget cuts.
[font size=1]-snip-[/font]
House passes sweeping defense policy bill; measure's future is cloudy
WASHINGTON
The U.S. House of Representatives passed the $612 billion annual defense authorization bill on Thursday, but the measure's future was clouded by a dispute between Republicans and Democrats over government spending policy.
The House voted 270-156 to pass the National Defense Authorization Act, which sets spending policy for the Department of Defense but does not appropriate the funds. The vote was largely along party lines, with most Republicans favoring the bill and most Democrats opposing it.
The Senate is due to vote on the measure next week.
The White House said on Wednesday that President Barack Obama would veto the bill if it is passed in Congress because of the "irresponsible" way it boosts military spending.
The NDAA uses some $90 billion in discretionary funds meant for war spending, to allow the Pentagon to sidestep mandatory "sequestration" budget cuts.
[font size=1]-snip-[/font]
Read more: http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/10/01/us-usa-fiscal-defense-idUSKCN0RV5GK20151001
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 799 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (0)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
House passes sweeping defense policy bill; measure's future is cloudy (Original Post)
Eugene
Oct 2015
OP
randys1
(16,286 posts)1. Was the 911 first responders money continued ?? They had till midnight yesterday I think
Eugene
(61,938 posts)2. The act expired last night.
According to NBC, current funding will last into 2016.
Never Forget? Law Covering 9/11 Responders' Medical Care Expires
randys1
(16,286 posts)3. So the teaparty hates first responders too. The guy I saw interviewed said the house republicans
complained right to their face that they didnt want to pay for it.