Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

unhappycamper

(60,364 posts)
Wed Nov 7, 2012, 09:32 AM Nov 2012

The Next $1 Trillion Market: F-35 Sustainment Work

http://www.defensenews.com/article/20121104/DEFREG02/311040001/The-Next-1-Trillion-Market-F-35-Sustainment-Work



Support work for the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter is projected to be worth more than $1 trillion over the next 50 years.


The Next $1 Trillion Market: F-35 Sustainment Work
Nov. 4, 2012 - 01:31PM |
By AARON MEHTA and MARCUS WEISGERBER

~snip~

That shift will be on full display starting Nov. 14, when more than 100 defense firms will descend on Washington for an industry day focusing on sustainment of the multinational F-35 Joint Strike Fighter program. Sustainment of the aircraft is projected to cost more than $1 trillion over the next 50 years, and the companies will be scoping how to snap up their piece of the JSF sustainment pie.
5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Next $1 Trillion Market: F-35 Sustainment Work (Original Post) unhappycamper Nov 2012 OP
That's four times the initial projected acquisition cost in 2001! leveymg Nov 2012 #1
Stupid investment, HereSince1628 Nov 2012 #2
We don't (and hence can't) even build the things here, anymore. leveymg Nov 2012 #3
Why spend for an international power status that is behind us HereSince1628 Nov 2012 #4
The Praetorian Guard role only pays if the clients continue to overpay for arms. Not any longer. leveymg Nov 2012 #5

leveymg

(36,418 posts)
1. That's four times the initial projected acquisition cost in 2001!
Wed Nov 7, 2012, 09:35 AM
Nov 2012

Last edited Wed Nov 7, 2012, 12:00 PM - Edit history (1)

Set in 2001, the total acquisition cost of the F-35 was to be $233.0 billion. Compare that to the current estimate of $395.7 billion: http://nation.time.com/2012/07/09/f-35-nearly-doubles-in-cost-but-you-dont-know-thanks-to-its-rubber-baseline/

HereSince1628

(36,063 posts)
2. Stupid investment,
Wed Nov 7, 2012, 09:42 AM
Nov 2012

We can't defend against our real enemies who live in investment banks or their clients who rather than investing in military to overtake us, are free to cherry-pick the assets they want to take away from us.

leveymg

(36,418 posts)
3. We don't (and hence can't) even build the things here, anymore.
Wed Nov 7, 2012, 12:03 PM
Nov 2012

What is the purpose of building and maintaining this type of aircraft, if it's admittedly not superior to competitors?

HereSince1628

(36,063 posts)
4. Why spend for an international power status that is behind us
Wed Nov 7, 2012, 12:37 PM
Nov 2012

a power that if we try to keep it, will bankrupt us as surely as it did the Soviets?

The stupidity of trying to be #1 militarily when you are somewhere between #3 and #5 economically will ruin us.

leveymg

(36,418 posts)
5. The Praetorian Guard role only pays if the clients continue to overpay for arms. Not any longer.
Wed Nov 7, 2012, 02:31 PM
Nov 2012

Twenty years ago, the Saudis were willing to shell out a lot of cash to pay the direct costs of US interventions in their region. They don't do that any longer, and the subsequent occupations of Iraq and Afghanistan broke the US Treasury.

The Chinese only underwrite our excesses because they know that in the long run (shorter than that, actually), we'll exhaust ourselves.

This game is unsustainable, and America needs to find another line of work. What kind of work? Just look at Germany.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Veterans»The Next $1 Trillion Mark...