Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,710 posts)
Fri Aug 14, 2015, 12:09 PM Aug 2015

giftedgirl,another one of our friends has been silenced






http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=profile&uid=304197



I am at a loss for words. All I can say is you don't show respect for people by shutting them up and when you have a party that is nearly 45% minority and a board that is supposed to represent that party that is 95% or more majority and the few minority voices are being systematically silenced something isn't right.

127 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
giftedgirl,another one of our friends has been silenced (Original Post) DemocratSinceBirth Aug 2015 OP
Post removed Post removed Aug 2015 #1
Of course she was JustAnotherGen Aug 2015 #2
I am so upset... DemocratSinceBirth Aug 2015 #3
Report back if you can review . Local TV reviewer gave it an A. Person 2713 Aug 2015 #55
I see absolutely nothing wrong with the message but we can send a more underthematrix Aug 2015 #12
This is so sad brer cat Aug 2015 #4
Right on! lib87 Aug 2015 #9
"Yes Tommy, that was a good thing..a very, very good thing! BlueJazz Aug 2015 #52
ANTHONY.....!!! I posted it in this thread... MADem Aug 2015 #76
You brought up some scary memories for me. I remember that episode well. Tarheel_Dem Aug 2015 #61
Did you think you were in danger of turning into a jack in the box? lib87 Aug 2015 #70
It's a good DU life!!! And we're surrounded by Anthonys!! GAAAH!!! MADem Aug 2015 #75
Oh yes! A Very good thing DU! lib87 Aug 2015 #83
In the years I have been lurking and posting carla Aug 2015 #32
+1 lib87 Aug 2015 #77
The jury system has become a way to object to anothers opinion. Thinkingabout Aug 2015 #5
that's right underthematrix Aug 2015 #13
It's broken. blackspade Aug 2015 #118
Do you think this is happening more at this time than in years past? Thinkingabout Aug 2015 #125
It does seem that way. blackspade Aug 2015 #127
Bernie Underground.... quickesst Aug 2015 #6
That's awesome! JustAnotherGen Aug 2015 #7
This is bogus point-of-view discrimination. doxyluv13 Aug 2015 #30
Pitt was to me. redstateblues Aug 2015 #34
I'm kinda glad I don't know half the shit that goes on around here. roguevalley Aug 2015 #35
Trade the oar/staff... quickesst Aug 2015 #47
Yup...nt SidDithers Aug 2015 #10
I'm a Bernie supporter and I'm not digging any of this crap. nt nc4bo Aug 2015 #16
Sometimes... quickesst Aug 2015 #46
To be honest I read the alert as posted here and I am not so sure it was a Bernie person who alerted azurnoir Aug 2015 #60
Same here jfern Aug 2015 #114
Same here. blackspade Aug 2015 #120
There are soooooooooo many Bernie supporters here that are as sick of these people as the rest Number23 Aug 2015 #84
I know... quickesst Aug 2015 #89
That is the truth! blackspade Aug 2015 #121
I had a feeling that this was going to happen BumRushDaShow Aug 2015 #8
Exactly! nt Andy823 Aug 2015 #23
There are other sites. I think what happens is some people believe underthematrix Aug 2015 #11
She can do some modeling? ... Come on ... 1StrongBlackMan Aug 2015 #48
I would love to read the jury comments for the hidden post below, too. George II Aug 2015 #14
Wow. The jury system is not working out well nc4bo Aug 2015 #15
I think the Jury system mostly works. I also think that of her six hides..... marble falls Aug 2015 #17
FWIW I looked at her transparency page and frankly couldn't find any of those hides Cleita Aug 2015 #18
EXACTLY! nt nc4bo Aug 2015 #20
I totally agree. nt Andy823 Aug 2015 #26
As in real life, the white majority rules. This group is being alert stalked out of existence. Tarheel_Dem Aug 2015 #19
In the interest of disclosure re: her transparency page Orrex Aug 2015 #21
Link for post she made - please. 840high Aug 2015 #22
Damn, are you kidding? I served on that jury, I'm pretty sure. F4lconF16 Aug 2015 #24
Wow, they're strict…. doxyluv13 Aug 2015 #41
How Jews Became White Folks and What that Says About Race in America (review) MrScorpio Aug 2015 #43
DU BS talking points mcar Aug 2015 #63
Lot of Hillary supporters getting time outs AgingAmerican Aug 2015 #25
Race trumps party lines. I believe it's racially motivated. nc4bo Aug 2015 #27
Everyone has to play by the same rules AgingAmerican Aug 2015 #39
No, they don't. Bobbie Jo Aug 2015 #51
In the Jim crow south ... 1StrongBlackMan Aug 2015 #54
No, actually I don't think they do. :( Hekate Aug 2015 #94
Not here they don't.. that's the problem. Cha Aug 2015 #96
no everyone doesn't Quayblue Aug 2015 #113
And what "rules" would those be? blackspade Aug 2015 #122
Just be nice the police officer, and he won't shoot you. nt F4lconF16 Aug 2015 #28
LOL ... 1StrongBlackMan Aug 2015 #57
lol Bobbie Jo Aug 2015 #29
Gosh,I wonder why? nt sufrommich Aug 2015 #33
Rudeness crosses the racial divide Android3.14 Aug 2015 #40
Killing people is even more rude. FrodosPet Aug 2015 #56
I do not understand the purpose of your post Android3.14 Aug 2015 #62
Neither I, nor GiftedGirl are HRC supporters ... 1StrongBlackMan Aug 2015 #53
You are a real sweetheart brer cat Aug 2015 #64
Brilliant. sheshe2 Aug 2015 #90
thank you, brer cat.. just had to come in here and explain how to act like they're so perfect and Cha Aug 2015 #97
no. many in the AA group who got timeouts are not Hillary supporters JI7 Aug 2015 #66
YOu're wrong. Not all of these voices are Hillary supporters.. but they are African American. Cha Aug 2015 #99
Should it be renamed SU? redstateblues Aug 2015 #31
It's time to either put a limit on alerts or bbgrunt Aug 2015 #36
There is no way I'd have voted to hide 4 of those posts Warpy Aug 2015 #37
Every single one of those hides were comepletely bogus MrScorpio Aug 2015 #38
The jury system is a joke workinclasszero Aug 2015 #42
I'm more convinced than ever that these are disrupters. blackspade Aug 2015 #123
As a Bernie supporter, I stand in solidarity and do NOT approve of this silencing of voices. n/t retrowire Aug 2015 #44
This is really fucking getting out of hand. Dr Hobbitstein Aug 2015 #45
What. The. Hell. And yet POSUCS is okay?! Hekate Aug 2015 #49
Apparently it is, Hekate. sheshe2 Aug 2015 #91
Yeh. And in case someone asks again why POSUCS is being referenced yet again... Hekate Aug 2015 #93
So.. Now what? Flying Squirrel Aug 2015 #50
I've asked questions on ATA that never get answered. kwassa Aug 2015 #59
So have I - but that is no reason to not ask the question. Flying Squirrel Aug 2015 #67
Why expend the effort if there is not going to be a response? kwassa Aug 2015 #69
Because you have no way of knowing what your small part may do. Flying Squirrel Aug 2015 #82
I sent a note to Skinner just yesterday about the disgusting smear against 1SBM that was allowed to Number23 Aug 2015 #85
Just keep at it Flying Squirrel Aug 2015 #100
I don't think he monitors the site closely... onpatrol98 Aug 2015 #104
No, I agree with you 100%. I have long since suspected that Skinner is more disgusted with what Number23 Aug 2015 #107
i think he is too, from what he says. nt seabeyond Aug 2015 #116
OK, this is getting disgusting DonCoquixote Aug 2015 #58
You said it, Don Hekate Aug 2015 #95
When you can't call a white man white dougolat Aug 2015 #65
Those all look like BS hides. nt awoke_in_2003 Aug 2015 #68
OFFS. Starry Messenger Aug 2015 #71
Or the Black Wall Street Riot. DemocratSinceBirth Aug 2015 #72
Agreed. Starry Messenger Aug 2015 #78
I recently learned about that... DemocratSinceBirth Aug 2015 #79
WHAT is going on here???????????? MADem Aug 2015 #73
It is a very bad look. That is indisputable. DemocratSinceBirth Aug 2015 #74
There are some people who need to have their alerting and jurying privs taken away. Starry Messenger Aug 2015 #81
I'd like to see a dramatic increase in the number people can have on their jury blacklist Number23 Aug 2015 #86
That's an excellent idea. Starry Messenger Aug 2015 #87
I am sorry. MuseRider Aug 2015 #80
I think it's time for the admins to take a long hard look at the jury system. totodeinhere Aug 2015 #88
Another good, strong woman silenced. sheshe2 Aug 2015 #92
Aloha gifted girl! Sorry, the stupid Alert and Hide jury system got your Cha Aug 2015 #98
I remember this one time.... sgtbenobo Aug 2015 #101
This is so frustrating. lovemydog Aug 2015 #102
Anyone who gets five hides in sixteen days... NaturalHigh Aug 2015 #103
Anyone who gets five hides in sixteen days has CLEARLY BEEN TARGETED DemocratSinceBirth Aug 2015 #105
It's even worse than it looks. okasha Aug 2015 #109
To be fair it is because some of them and some of us have run afoul of a certain orthodoxy. DemocratSinceBirth Aug 2015 #110
She was pursued relentlessly. okasha Aug 2015 #111
Look I have been personally targetteed nadinbrzezinski Aug 2015 #124
Ya know... Bobbie Jo Aug 2015 #106
Take a look at the posts though treestar Aug 2015 #108
please and bye Quayblue Aug 2015 #112
NO. Not "clearly".. you obviously know nothing about it. Cha Aug 2015 #115
This is so fucking lame. blackspade Aug 2015 #117
i feel like i played tag team with gift and brave. they get sent to penalty box and i am let out. seabeyond Aug 2015 #119
This is definately a problem: blackspade Aug 2015 #126

Response to DemocratSinceBirth (Original post)

JustAnotherGen

(31,828 posts)
2. Of course she was
Fri Aug 14, 2015, 12:12 PM
Aug 2015

She stood in her truth.

One must play nicey nicey fakey fake phoney baloney with the folks around here or risk getting silenced.


A lot of fake is going around.

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,710 posts)
3. I am so upset...
Fri Aug 14, 2015, 12:15 PM
Aug 2015

"Blood is coming out of my eyes...Blood is coming out of my everywhere..."

I am going to see 'Straight Outta Compton' in a few minutes... It should be cathartic.


underthematrix

(5,811 posts)
12. I see absolutely nothing wrong with the message but we can send a more
Fri Aug 14, 2015, 01:39 PM
Aug 2015

powerful messagw with our primary or caucus vote.

brer cat

(24,578 posts)
4. This is so sad
Fri Aug 14, 2015, 12:18 PM
Aug 2015

and wrong. I just don't know what to make of some of the people here. Neither liberal nor progressive for sure.

lib87

(535 posts)
9. Right on!
Fri Aug 14, 2015, 12:54 PM
Aug 2015

This reminds me of the twilight zone episode 'It's a Good Life" where everyone had to make sure not to upset a child or else risk severe punishment. Reminds me DU right about now.


On an isolated family farm, a young boy with vast mental powers, but lacking emotional development, holds his terrified family in thrall to his every juvenile wish.

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0734580/

lib87

(535 posts)
70. Did you think you were in danger of turning into a jack in the box?
Fri Aug 14, 2015, 06:15 PM
Aug 2015

lol

that episode was one of my favorites!

carla

(553 posts)
32. In the years I have been lurking and posting
Fri Aug 14, 2015, 02:40 PM
Aug 2015

I have seen "us" become ConservativeReactionUnderground. Probably get me banned, but someone needs to speak truth to power, here too!

blackspade

(10,056 posts)
118. It's broken.
Mon Aug 17, 2015, 01:59 PM
Aug 2015

The fact that minority voices are being stalked out of DU is reprehensible.
Those doing it should be ashamed.

blackspade

(10,056 posts)
127. It does seem that way.
Mon Aug 17, 2015, 02:47 PM
Aug 2015

Alert stalking has been around and a problem since the jury system started, but the primaries seem to have pulled the assholes out of the woodwork.
I would say that it has gotten especially bad for POC.

I serve on a fair number of juries and I see plenty of bullshit alerts and call them out as such.
The timing (as another poster here pointed out) is what gets the hides.
I think that a small cadre of disruptors alert late at night/early morning when they are on en mass to get these hides.
It would be interesting to see the composition of these juries and the alerters to see the pattern of abuse.


doxyluv13

(247 posts)
30. This is bogus point-of-view discrimination.
Fri Aug 14, 2015, 02:38 PM
Aug 2015

Checked her "hides". You could argue the William Pitt comment should be hidden (she calls him a dick), but I wouldn't have voted to hide. The rest of the hides are laughable.

azurnoir

(45,850 posts)
60. To be honest I read the alert as posted here and I am not so sure it was a Bernie person who alerted
Fri Aug 14, 2015, 03:56 PM
Aug 2015

and that's all I'll say

blackspade

(10,056 posts)
120. Same here.
Mon Aug 17, 2015, 02:09 PM
Aug 2015

The "individuals" doing the alert stalking are the worst sort of partisan.
I'm honestly no fan of Clinton, but I feel no need to silence her supporters or anyone else for their opinions about a candidate.
It appears that some around here have reduced the candidates to their 'supporters' rather than focusing on the positions of the candidates themselves.
Both camps need to knock off the alert stalking and rhetoric. This is not a high school election, but serious shit.
Black people are dying in the streets while some fools here try to notch their belts with pathetic discussion board victories.

Number23

(24,544 posts)
84. There are soooooooooo many Bernie supporters here that are as sick of these people as the rest
Fri Aug 14, 2015, 08:09 PM
Aug 2015

of us. They are as disgusted and fed up with this crap as everyone else is.

We have lots of Bernie supporters in this forum and a Bernie supporter, Blue_Tires is a host. It's not all of them by any stretch of the imagination. But Lord knows, it's ENOUGH of them.

quickesst

(6,280 posts)
89. I know...
Fri Aug 14, 2015, 08:33 PM
Aug 2015

That's why I fixed my oversight in my reply to nc4bo. I usually add a "not all" or "just some" to my posts when addressing "some" Bernie supporters.

BumRushDaShow

(129,096 posts)
8. I had a feeling that this was going to happen
Fri Aug 14, 2015, 12:50 PM
Aug 2015

Get up in their faces and

DU was hijacked and although half of my ignore list has been PPRd, a whole new crop have arisen to take their place (many who drank a bit too much of the Firedog Lake koolaid). And there have been exoduses of folks to other sites - including most recently when Skinner set up a separate Hillary site.

So when the bullies take over the neighborhood, eventually they are all that's left after they chase everyone else away. And then that's when they start to eat their own.

underthematrix

(5,811 posts)
11. There are other sites. I think what happens is some people believe
Fri Aug 14, 2015, 01:29 PM
Aug 2015

their personal offense to another person's opinion is sufficient to report the poster. i don't agree with that approach but I understand a lot of it has to do with privilege, racism, and in some cases poor critical thinking skills.

From TOD (theObamaDiary) I see Bernie hired an AA press secretary. Maybe she can do some modeling for Bernie supporters.

 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
48. She can do some modeling? ... Come on ...
Fri Aug 14, 2015, 03:17 PM
Aug 2015

she's blah ... er, ... she's a shhhh ... er, she worked for Nader!

nc4bo

(17,651 posts)
15. Wow. The jury system is not working out well
Fri Aug 14, 2015, 01:59 PM
Aug 2015

Don't know how many times I've said that.

Silly alerts with silly hides.

What in the hell are we supposed to converse about when every damn thing gets alerted on, sent to jury then hidden?!

Not cool DU, not cool.

marble falls

(57,106 posts)
17. I think the Jury system mostly works. I also think that of her six hides.....
Fri Aug 14, 2015, 02:02 PM
Aug 2015

there are two, one of which is legit, and one about my good friend WillPitt that is borderline (I'd have voted to leave it) and four totally bogus alerts.

Maybe DU needs to look at the anonymity of alerters. Or maybe limit the number of alerts per week or day from individuals.

I've been hidden maybe 6 or 7 times and I saw why I got alerted and agreed with it 4 or 5 times.

Cleita

(75,480 posts)
18. FWIW I looked at her transparency page and frankly couldn't find any of those hides
Fri Aug 14, 2015, 02:05 PM
Aug 2015

justified. They were strongly offered opinions and I didn't agree with some of them. I am a Bernie supporter, but people are entitled to their opinion. It appears she probably will be given a timeout and be among us again in the future.

Tarheel_Dem

(31,235 posts)
19. As in real life, the white majority rules. This group is being alert stalked out of existence.
Fri Aug 14, 2015, 02:06 PM
Aug 2015

I'm not quite sure why that's not apparent to the powers that be, but you can only turn a blind eye for so long.

F4lconF16

(3,747 posts)
24. Damn, are you kidding? I served on that jury, I'm pretty sure.
Fri Aug 14, 2015, 02:25 PM
Aug 2015

Results for it from last night:

On Fri Aug 14, 2015, 01:22 AM an alert was sent on the following post:

Oh my gawd, do you see what you are typing?
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=517528

REASON FOR ALERT

This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.

ALERTER'S COMMENTS

This poster has repeatedly used anti-Semitic dog whistles in this thread and has now gone too far. Claiming that Jewish people enjoy white privilege in this country even after it's been explained that Jews are a hated minority is offensive. Anti-Semitism is every bit as vile as racism and we need to stop excusing bigotry of all kinds on DU.

JURY RESULTS

You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Fri Aug 14, 2015, 01:50 AM, and the Jury voted 4-3 to HIDE IT.

Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Not what was said at all, alerter. If there were anti-Semetic dog whistles in the rest of the thread, please alert on those. As a very privileged white guy who also happens to be an atheist, another persecuted "religious" minority in the US, I agree with that post completely. It's definitely not hide-worthy. (And yes, I know that atheism isn't the same. It was an example.)

Also, hell yes to this: "Walking around as an obvious privileged white guy who enjoys all the privilege's as such needs to own that shit. "
Juror #2 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: To downplay the fact that a Jewish man who lost relatives in the Holocaust saying that he didn't know them and 'they were strangers' is way over the top. We need to be sensitive to all minority groups, including the Jewish. Black lives DO matter, but so do the 6 million Jewish lives extinguished during that horrible time in history.
Juror #3 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Don't they teach history in our schools anymore? Does this person even realize that no Jewish person has ever been elected President, specifically due to anti-Semitism, in this country? I hesitated to hide this at first, but after reading most of the poster's comments within this thread, I agree with this alert.
Juror #4 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: More thought needs to be put into posts. This one is simply a vicious, nasty spasm.
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #6 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given

Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.


I was Juror #1.

doxyluv13

(247 posts)
41. Wow, they're strict….
Fri Aug 14, 2015, 02:54 PM
Aug 2015

Although anti-Semitism is real, of course American Jews enjoy the privileges of being white.

MrScorpio

(73,631 posts)
43. How Jews Became White Folks and What that Says About Race in America (review)
Fri Aug 14, 2015, 03:00 PM
Aug 2015
In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

American Jewish History 88.1 (2000) 156-159
How Jews Became White Folks and What that Says About Race in America. By Karen Brodkin. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 1998. xi + 241 pp.

This is an excellent book in many ways. It makes an extremely important contribution to the study of American Jewish history and beyond. Brodkin offers a highly developed analysis of how the category of Jews came to be equated with the category of "White" in the United States since World War II. To do so, she also explains how racial categorization worked prior to that time, so that previously Jews were not considered properly within the boundaries of Whiteness and its privileges. As the subtitle suggests, Brodkin engages in this examination not only by drawing on the literature of critical race theory more broadly, but so that she can also say something about racial formation and racialization in the U.S. beyond the case study of Jews.

Brodkin's work is part of an interdisciplinary effort to conceptualize identity politically. In particular, the work is situated within a discourse and political movement which understands that not only do we all have multiple identities, but that these multiple identities are mutually constitutive of one another. First, this means that one is not simply a man, or a Jew, or working class, or bisexual: one is all of these. Second, the framework within which Brodkin is working and developing is one in which these multiple signifiers of identity are interrogated for the ways that each aspect actually constitutes the others. In this view, the gender of Jewish men and Jewish women, for example, becomes explicitly "Jewed." The ethnoracial construction of Jewishness is gendered; it is sexed; and it is classed. Brodkin's work would have benefitted greatly if she had held sexuality and sexual orientation in the complex more fully with her integrative critique of the race/ethnicity, class, and gender of a shifting Jewish identity in the U.S. Nevertheless, she makes an important contribution to the race/gender/class literature for Jewish studies and from within the historical experience of Jews to the broader race, class, gender discussion. This book will become a significant resource for those able to push (and therefore in many ways probably redefine) the analysis with the insights of queer studies.

Brodkin provides a helpful tool by distinguishing between what she calls ethnoracial assignment and ethnoracial identity. Assignment refers to "the ways in which the dominant culture and popular understandings construct different categories of social and political beings," whereas identity, used in a political sense, refers "to a system of values and meaning shared within a community by which we measure ourselves as social actors" (p. 21). Brodkin critically examines the interplay between assignment and identity as it transformed over time and in relation to larger political phenomena in the U.S. The story she tells of this interplay provides valuable insight into the changing nature of Jewish identity in its ever mutating raced/gendered/classed formulations. Simultaneously, the story she tells provides valuable insight into the changing nature of the ethnoracial construction of off-Whites (those not quite White and not African) in U.S. history and how that (re)created the very (and continually binary) categories of White and Black in this country over time.

http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/ajh/summary/v088/88.1brettschneider.html


To the alerter: It's true, a certain category of Jews are indeed beneficiaries of American white supremacy. We can debate this, if you'd like.
 

AgingAmerican

(12,958 posts)
25. Lot of Hillary supporters getting time outs
Fri Aug 14, 2015, 02:26 PM
Aug 2015

It's pretty easy to NOT get posts hidden. Just don't be so offensive and you won't get hides it's as simple as that.

nc4bo

(17,651 posts)
27. Race trumps party lines. I believe it's racially motivated.
Fri Aug 14, 2015, 02:35 PM
Aug 2015

Tell a truth from an AA perspective and rest assured, you will be stalked and or scrutinized on every comment you make.

Overstep the "boundaries" just 1 inch and someone will be slobbering over an alert button and then, that's when the posse takes over.

blackspade

(10,056 posts)
122. And what "rules" would those be?
Mon Aug 17, 2015, 02:17 PM
Aug 2015

Are you talking about "rules" that are applied unequally in real life as well as here at DU?

 

Android3.14

(5,402 posts)
40. Rudeness crosses the racial divide
Fri Aug 14, 2015, 02:54 PM
Aug 2015

Immediately accusing people, who almost certainly support AA goals, of being racist just because they disagree with a tactic or with the candidate they support is rude, and folks should stop.

FrodosPet

(5,169 posts)
56. Killing people is even more rude.
Fri Aug 14, 2015, 03:36 PM
Aug 2015

Forcing someone to go to their child's funeral because their baby had the bad fortune of encountering an angry, paranoid, trigger happy law enforcement officer is pretty much at the top of the list of impoliteness.

 

Android3.14

(5,402 posts)
62. I do not understand the purpose of your post
Fri Aug 14, 2015, 04:09 PM
Aug 2015

How does the situation you described justify giftedgirl being rude to someone on DU?

 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
53. Neither I, nor GiftedGirl are HRC supporters ...
Fri Aug 14, 2015, 03:33 PM
Aug 2015

but that doesn't stop Bernie supporter like yourself from referring to us as such.

Here: let me give an example ...

It's pretty easy to NOT get posts hidden. Just don't be so offensive and you won't get hides it's as simple as that.


If I alerted on that comment, with the reason ... The commenter has been told several times over that neither 1SBM or GiftedGirl are HRC supporter ... and we are in a space where: 80% of the potential jury, either supports 1SBM/GiftedGirl, or despises you for your differing opinion ... that comment by you, would likely be hidden as "offensive".

See how that works?

brer cat

(24,578 posts)
64. You are a real sweetheart
Fri Aug 14, 2015, 04:24 PM
Aug 2015

to come in here and ‘splain to us how to stay out of trouble on this big ol’ site. "Just don’t be so offensive…it's as simple as that." My, my, my, how did I miss that? It must be because I am female or something, dontcha know. I’ll bet your momma would be real proud to know that you took all her lessons to heart, and go around helping people, even those who don’t ask you. Now, don’t blush and rub your toe in the dirt; you deserve a good pat on the back.

And you had to go so far out of your way to get to this particular group, you really walked the extra mile. I’ll bet you learned that while marching with Dr. King. He could sure hoof it, couldn’t he? Oh, that brings back the memories. He knew all about being non offensive and not misbehaving. Say, did you teach him that? Now, don’t be shy, take a bow for being so smart.

I’m almost elderly so I really do appreciate your help here.

Cha

(297,323 posts)
97. thank you, brer cat.. just had to come in here and explain how to act like they're so perfect and
Fri Aug 14, 2015, 10:24 PM
Aug 2015

all. Not.

bbgrunt

(5,281 posts)
36. It's time to either put a limit on alerts or
Fri Aug 14, 2015, 02:46 PM
Aug 2015

identify people who are engaged in alerting on posts. Identity of alerters would go a long way to reduce the number of alerts that are ill-founded. It would also reduce the accusations about who is alerting constantly--as currently no one knows who is behind an alert.

Warpy

(111,277 posts)
37. There is no way I'd have voted to hide 4 of those posts
Fri Aug 14, 2015, 02:52 PM
Aug 2015

and the fifth was borderline. They got lucky with juries.

I hope she comes back, she is gifted. When she does (and I hope it's a "when), let's hope she shitcans GD-P so she's not as tempted to rise to the stinkbait people there chum the waters with. That's really half the battle, saying what you have to say and never returning to that thread.

Face it, if you tell people truths they'd rather not hear, you will be a target.

MrScorpio

(73,631 posts)
38. Every single one of those hides were comepletely bogus
Fri Aug 14, 2015, 02:53 PM
Aug 2015

Yep, there's an element here bound and determined to silence our voices.

 

workinclasszero

(28,270 posts)
42. The jury system is a joke
Fri Aug 14, 2015, 02:55 PM
Aug 2015

When the majority of this board will not tolerate democrats right to support Hillary or anyone other than BS.

They are packed with his supporters and seeing the results daily, they have no interest in fairness at all.

blackspade

(10,056 posts)
123. I'm more convinced than ever that these are disrupters.
Mon Aug 17, 2015, 02:24 PM
Aug 2015

Actual Sanders supporters don't stand for this shit.
Making this a Sanders vs Clinton problem glosses over the alert stalking against POC at this site.



Hekate

(90,714 posts)
93. Yeh. And in case someone asks again why POSUCS is being referenced yet again...
Fri Aug 14, 2015, 09:16 PM
Aug 2015

....it is because to a great many of us, that phrase that was let to stand has become the DU standard of just how low SOME people can go without getting so much as a slap on the wrist.

And yet for others...

 

Flying Squirrel

(3,041 posts)
50. So.. Now what?
Fri Aug 14, 2015, 03:27 PM
Aug 2015

Skinner has repeatedly defended the jury system, even to the point of saying that Hillary supporters (of which he is one) have to be especially polite. If you go into ATA and specifically ask him to address the concern of Black voices being silenced on DU (at this of all times when BLM is in the news and their refusal to be polite has gotten some significant positive results), will he respond that Black people need to be especially polite?

I don't know the answer, but I'd love to see what happens if a spokesperson from this group were to go find out.

kwassa

(23,340 posts)
59. I've asked questions on ATA that never get answered.
Fri Aug 14, 2015, 03:54 PM
Aug 2015

So have many others.

This makes resolution of these problems impossible.

 

Flying Squirrel

(3,041 posts)
67. So have I - but that is no reason to not ask the question.
Fri Aug 14, 2015, 05:24 PM
Aug 2015

Even if he does not respond, it may eventually lead to change if it's asked enough times.

kwassa

(23,340 posts)
69. Why expend the effort if there is not going to be a response?
Fri Aug 14, 2015, 06:07 PM
Aug 2015

When I rarely asked before, I got wonderful well-reasoned responses.

 

Flying Squirrel

(3,041 posts)
82. Because you have no way of knowing what your small part may do.
Fri Aug 14, 2015, 07:20 PM
Aug 2015

The only thing you can reasonably bevsure of is that the entirety of the change you want will not happen immediately as the result of your action. But your small push in the right direction, added to the push of many others over time, may eventually change the inertia. But if you're looking for near certainties, the one thing practically guaranteed to be true is that if you (and everyone else making the assumption that they cannot change anything with their words) say nothing to those in position to make changes, then nothing will change. (That's why BLM supporters did what they did.)

I understand defeatist thinking, I've been a victim of it myself in the past, and it has never gotten me anywhere so I've abandoned it out of sheer logic. May I humbly suggest that you consider doing the same!

Number23

(24,544 posts)
85. I sent a note to Skinner just yesterday about the disgusting smear against 1SBM that was allowed to
Fri Aug 14, 2015, 08:15 PM
Aug 2015

stand while his post defending himself against the smear was hidden. He has not responded yet.

Tarheel_Dem has also posted questions in AtA about this but says that she's gotten no response. I'm not sure what else we're supposed to do.

 

Flying Squirrel

(3,041 posts)
100. Just keep at it
Sat Aug 15, 2015, 12:16 AM
Aug 2015

Change takes time.. At some point I hope Skinner will be moved to come up with an improvement over the way the jury system allows people to silence others here. I was so upset with unrec that I left DU for a long time, and that function was finally retired. The jury system is an improvement over unrec but there is still massive room for improvement. I'll add my own voice in ATA on the subject - it may not get a response but at least it will be heard.

onpatrol98

(1,989 posts)
104. I don't think he monitors the site closely...
Sat Aug 15, 2015, 08:01 AM
Aug 2015

I mean wouldn't that have to be it. Either 1) we're on the site more than he is (that would be sad as horribly as the place treats us lately) or 2) he sees it and just doesn't give a care.

Number23

(24,544 posts)
107. No, I agree with you 100%. I have long since suspected that Skinner is more disgusted with what
Sat Aug 15, 2015, 07:10 PM
Aug 2015

his site has devolved into more than any of us could ever be. There's probably a big element of "don't care" too but I honestly think that he's embarrassed by how insane DU is now.

DonCoquixote

(13,616 posts)
58. OK, this is getting disgusting
Fri Aug 14, 2015, 03:47 PM
Aug 2015

Nowhere in this post were there the standard dog whistles of anti-semitism. The only thing noted is that Jews, because the majority can sometimes not tell them apart from others based on appearance alone, might not be obvious targets. Obvious is important because we all know as sure as hell as they are known to be Jews, the very people that were so polite to them will start talking behind their back and trying to land knives in said back.

But that is not the main point:

Point one: Some of the Bernie Supporters have acted shameful, in a manner that totally is at odds with Bernie himself has said. Right now, just as I want Hillary to apologize for letting Bill blow dog whistles like some grand wizard back in 2008, I want Bernie to apologize and rein in his followers, who have acted in a repugnant manner.

Point Two: DU has to address a Jury system that has been hijacked. I do not care if Skinner tells his fellow Hillary supporters to play nice, or if he builds a magic sandbox for them where they can spend all day giving each other high-fives. The fact is, the DU Jury system has devolved into a lynch mob that will treat the ToS like toilet paper and allow people to act out their worst instincts. THIS NEEDS FIXING NOW!

dougolat

(716 posts)
65. When you can't call a white man white
Fri Aug 14, 2015, 04:37 PM
Aug 2015

or ask honest questions about the significance of being Jewish, (or in another context, condemn the slaughter in Gaza, or object to the efforts to block the Iran Nuclear treaty, or mention who DOES have nuclear weapons in the ME but WON'T sign the Nuclear Proliferation Treaty and certainly won't allow inspections by the UN, the IAEA, or their main financial backer, arms supplier, and protector from UN condemnation) without causing a storm of "Anti-Semitic!!!" outrage: well what CAN you say?
It's unhealthy?
Classic Third Rail ?
Emotional wounds ?
Taboo?
Protective over-reaction ?
Frustration with the tone-deaf ?
Lord, forgive them, they know not what they do?

-still wondering.

Starry Messenger

(32,342 posts)
71. OFFS.
Fri Aug 14, 2015, 06:24 PM
Aug 2015

Lots of ~~~sensitive people~~~ on those juries too, I'll bet. This is starting to feel like reading about the Peekskill riots.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
73. WHAT is going on here????????????
Fri Aug 14, 2015, 06:28 PM
Aug 2015

Skinner needs to take a hard look at this--I see Sanders supporters hurling direct insults at people, and because they are in the majority, they're getting a pass. And I'm seeing black people--black women, mostly--getting the SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP GET OFF HOW DARE YOU treatment, and being bum-rushed and swarmed.

This is BAD. It's leaving a very foul taste.

Starry Messenger

(32,342 posts)
81. There are some people who need to have their alerting and jurying privs taken away.
Fri Aug 14, 2015, 07:16 PM
Aug 2015

I wonder if it can be programmed so they can't alert on certain people, and block them from the juries of people of color from the AA group.

Number23

(24,544 posts)
86. I'd like to see a dramatic increase in the number people can have on their jury blacklist
Fri Aug 14, 2015, 08:18 PM
Aug 2015

20 for non-donors. 30 for donors.

I can't think of any other solutions right now. We are a minority that the majority has deemed expendable and unwanted. I'm not sure what else can be done without admin intervention.

Starry Messenger

(32,342 posts)
87. That's an excellent idea.
Fri Aug 14, 2015, 08:25 PM
Aug 2015

Or an even higher amount on the list. What is happening here is more racist than things I've witnessed offline. We aren't going to have any Black posters left, and I know this shit takes a real life toll too.

totodeinhere

(13,058 posts)
88. I think it's time for the admins to take a long hard look at the jury system.
Fri Aug 14, 2015, 08:28 PM
Aug 2015

It either needs some major reforms or it needs to be scrapped completely and replaced with something else altogether.

Cha

(297,323 posts)
98. Aloha gifted girl! Sorry, the stupid Alert and Hide jury system got your
Fri Aug 14, 2015, 10:32 PM
Aug 2015

voice silenced for too long. Looking forward to your return, gifted.

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,710 posts)
105. Anyone who gets five hides in sixteen days has CLEARLY BEEN TARGETED
Sat Aug 15, 2015, 08:51 AM
Aug 2015
Anyone who gets five hides in sixteen days... is going out of the way not to play by the rules.


Anyone who gets five hides in sixteen days has CLEARLY BEEN TARGETED


My best friend and former business partner worked in the Human Resources Department of the city of Orlando. One of his responsibilities was to look for patterns of discrimination in hiring and firing. If there was a pattern of members of a protected class being hired or fired disproportionately to their percentage of the population that was prima facie evidence of discrimination.

Several African American members of this board have had their accounts suspended or are on the brink of having their accounts suspended. When you compare those numbers to the numbers of regular African American posters who post here regularly and the total universe of posters who post here regularly there is prima facie evidence of discrimination and the burden falls on the host to disprove it.

okasha

(11,573 posts)
109. It's even worse than it looks.
Sat Aug 15, 2015, 09:02 PM
Aug 2015

Gifted girl had at least one more alert than shows. I was on the just for that one. It was a 4-3 Leave it, but it should have been 7-0. There was noting at all in that post that broke the rules.

There is a clear, evident intent to silence AA posters. It's disgusting.

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,710 posts)
110. To be fair it is because some of them and some of us have run afoul of a certain orthodoxy.
Sat Aug 15, 2015, 10:23 PM
Aug 2015

IMHO orthodoxy and liberalism are mutually exclusive.

okasha

(11,573 posts)
111. She was pursued relentlessly.
Sat Aug 15, 2015, 11:57 PM
Aug 2015

I know from being on the jury that there was at least one unsuccessful effort to get her posts hidden. Just on the assumption of smoke/fire, I assume there were also other unsuccessful attempts.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
124. Look I have been personally targetteed
Mon Aug 17, 2015, 02:24 PM
Aug 2015

and you will not like this. This is not actually about race. I cannot tell race though a screen so I would never know a person is white, brown, Latino, black or green for all that matters. (Or any other minority you might want to think off)

The problem is with the jury system (it is not a bug, it is a feature) and the bullying, again, not a bug, but a feature.

This site has way too many problems. My recommendation, chill and don't take it too seriously.

That said, there is a shit load of material I will NOT post at Democratic Underground. In fact, working on research for a piece that WILL NOT BE POSTED HERE, and it has to do with movement theory in the 21st century and a lot of reading i am doing into it. Another has to do with income inequality and capitalism. Neither of those pieces belongs at a hyper partisan site.

Food for thought for you... they used to.

This is the environment that has been allowed to flourish... and again, this is not a bug, it's a feature. And because of it, I do not alert, and I do not do juries.

Bobbie Jo

(14,341 posts)
106. Ya know...
Sat Aug 15, 2015, 01:11 PM
Aug 2015

What I don't get is why someone would go to all the trouble to step inside a protected group just to tell people...you're wrong.

The height of arrogance, and yet another excellent demonstration of the point.

"The rules" only apply to some around here.

These people were targeted. Period.

Quayblue

(1,045 posts)
112. please and bye
Sun Aug 16, 2015, 12:02 AM
Aug 2015

not hardly.

and what rules are these? The TOS rules?

The line is continuously toed around here. But that shall change soon.

blackspade

(10,056 posts)
117. This is so fucking lame.
Mon Aug 17, 2015, 01:55 PM
Aug 2015

I loath alert stalking. Folks that do it are .... lets just say that they are people with small minds and hearts.


 

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)
119. i feel like i played tag team with gift and brave. they get sent to penalty box and i am let out.
Mon Aug 17, 2015, 02:02 PM
Aug 2015

all women. take note.

here is the thing. i had people who do not particularly like me, but are fair and just take a look at my hides. there was only one that cam close to getting a hide. and that was my fault for phrasing that came out sounding like i wanted a man shot in the back. i would never suggest, imply or state that, but it did come off in that manner.

one post out of the five hides. all but one hide was 4-3 hide. one was 5-2 hide

during that same couple weeks of getting hides i had many many juries sent to me thru pm that were fails. again, many 4-3 leave. that clued me in that every post i wrote was rolling the dice.

i looked at gift, and i would have hid two, for calling pitt a dick, though he was no longer on du, and not like i disagreed. every other post of hers was totally alright. not one infraction. she was rolling the dice simply posting.

i haven't seen bravenak, but well... she is unique, and unique in the language and humor she uses. i watched for months, her being herself and never a hide, because.... she was a sanders supporter. she still spoke in her creative manner, and people LOVED it. as soon as she sided with blm, her creative, unique way of communicating was a problem. and she started getting her hides.

when 80-85% of du are sander supporters, not getting hides for shit, calling people names, candidates names, over the top and flat out lies like saying clinton dissed a mother of a dying daughter, they will be hands down the jury we sit in front of.

some will walk it honorably.

it will not be very much of a challenge to find four that may not like us. mouthy women. that do not see sanders as a savior, or.... simply is standing with blm as a sanders supporter, to get hides.

5 in two weeks.

lots of failed juries.

it is the same with gift and bravenak. hence the two and a half months kicked off.

blackspade

(10,056 posts)
126. This is definately a problem:
Mon Aug 17, 2015, 02:36 PM
Aug 2015
"i haven't seen bravenak, but well... she is unique, and unique in the language and humor she uses. i watched for months, her being herself and never a hide, because.... she was a sanders supporter. she still spoke in her creative manner, and people LOVED it. as soon as she sided with blm, her creative, unique way of communicating was a problem. and she started getting her hides."


This is largely true. BLM has brought out the dark underbelly of White liberal privilege. She was rightly pointing out that some Sanders 'supporters' were killing the messenger and ignoring the message in Seattle. So what do these folks do? Out came the knives....
It was disgusting.
Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»African American»giftedgirl,another one of...