Humor
Related: About this forumDU Jury comments
Juror #1 voted to HIDE IT and said: No explanation given
Juror #2 voted to HIDE IT and said: This post is nothing but opinionated insults directed at another DUer.
Juror #3 voted to HIDE IT and said: I reviewed the entire exchange, and this post jumps the line. I often look for a "self-defense" position for the "accused", but I do not see one here.
Juror #4 voted to HIDE IT and said: This is gratuitously mean-spirited post. Bury it.
Juror #5 voted to HIDE IT and said: A smart man covers his ass, a wise man leaves his pants on.
Juror #6 voted to HIDE IT and said: Nobody knows what another DUer thinks. This post is a personal attack, I think, since it attaches the poster's 'beliefs' about another DUer, and those beliefs are very negative in nature. I don't think DUers should be psychoanalyzing other DUers and posting negative conclusions about that psychoanalysis. MineralMan
Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: Where's the proof he's the "death threat" guy?
Juror #2 voted to HIDE IT and said: No explanation given
Juror #3 voted to HIDE IT and said: Some days it's not worth chewing through the straps.
Juror #4 voted to HIDE IT and said: No explanation given
Juror #5 voted to HIDE IT and said: No explanation given
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: Poster has already been PPRd
Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: No explanation given
Juror #2 voted to HIDE IT and said: You'd have to be way more specific than that - and then it would be a call-out. I'm voting to hide this because it does nothing to move the conversation forward - TBF
Juror #3 voted to HIDE IT and said: No explanation given
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: I drive way too fast to worry about cholesterol.
Juror #5 voted to HIDE IT and said: Different opinions does not require different philosophies.
Juror #6 voted to HIDE IT and said: No explanation given
Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: I agree that it probably is an intruder but there is no proof.
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: No explanation given
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: The purpose for the hearing was political. It was part of the continuing effort to gain back the power that the republicans lost when they destroyed the economy. They know full well that many republican governors happily signed the same concept into law. The truth does not matter. They are simply throwing sh** against the wall to see what sticks.
Yes it is about women and women's rights.
And, unfortunately, many people don't bother to think, but rather just re-state the talking points they were fed. This post is one example.
Although this post is wrong--ignorant is not necessarily enough to delete a post.
Juror #4 voted to HIDE IT and said: When you go into court, you are putting your fate into the hands of people who weren't smart enough to get out of jury duty.
Juror #5 voted to HIDE IT and said: Poster is incorrect, the hearing was all about political theater and has nothing to do with birth control, mandated insurance, or anything else besides poitical grandstanding by Issa.
Poster may also have taken a wrong turn and somehow ended up at DU.
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: Clearly RebelCarol needs some more information. If we lock her very first post, she may never get it.
Initech
(100,080 posts)This one is also a win: "When you go into court, you are putting your fate into the hands of people who weren't smart enough to get out of jury duty. "