Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

brush

(53,787 posts)
Sun Oct 31, 2021, 04:46 PM Oct 2021

Not defending Gruden in any way but why is the info on him...

Last edited Sun Oct 31, 2021, 05:55 PM - Edit history (1)

the only damaging info that is released of the deep investigation into the operations of the Washington football team? You just know other negative info was found out on other individuals from teams and the league.

Is it that anti-Al Davis/Raiderism still exists in the NFL front office?

And again, IMO, Gruden had to go after what came out.

2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Not defending Gruden in any way but why is the info on him... (Original Post) brush Oct 2021 OP
Probably because Goodell got butthurt over comments made about him by Gruden. Angleae Oct 2021 #1
They have fared better since Gruden's been gone. That's for sure. brush Nov 2021 #2

Angleae

(4,486 posts)
1. Probably because Goodell got butthurt over comments made about him by Gruden.
Sun Oct 31, 2021, 09:20 PM
Oct 2021

As far as anti-Davis/Raiders, it helped them out quite a bit. Gruden was incompetent and on a 10-year contract.

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Football»Not defending Gruden in a...