Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

rug

(82,333 posts)
Thu Mar 1, 2012, 04:35 PM Mar 2012

Judge in 'Zombie Muhammad' case is relocated after threats, criticism of ruling

Published: Tuesday, February 28, 2012, 2:40 PM
Updated: Tuesday, February 28, 2012, 3:05 PM
By MATTHEW KEMENY, The Patriot-News The Patriot-News

Mechanicsburg District Judge Mark Martin and his staff temporarily relocated to the Cumberland County Courthouse in Carlisle today due to threats his office has received and public criticism of his ruling in the "Zombie Muhammad" case. The county courthouse will make it easier to provide extra security.

For security reasons, Martin did not want to say how long he will be in the county courthouse, but noted his staff will be understanding to those impacted by the change. He said his office received more than 200 phone calls and emails from being criticizing his December ruling.

In addition, some online posts suggested he should be executed, Martin said.

Martin dismissed a harassment charge against 46-year-old Talaag Elbayomy, a Muslim accused of attacking Ernest Perce V, an atheist dressed as what he said was the "Zombie Muhammad" at a Halloween parade in Mechanicsburg last year.

http://www.pennlive.com/midstate/index.ssf/2012/02/judge_in_zombie_muhammad_case.html

20 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Judge in 'Zombie Muhammad' case is relocated after threats, criticism of ruling (Original Post) rug Mar 2012 OP
Seems awful quiet I wonder where they are. Leontius Mar 2012 #1
Threats from whom? dmallind Mar 2012 #2
I doubt it was Muslims. rug Mar 2012 #3
Links or it didn't happen. 2ndAmForComputers Mar 2012 #5
It's in the OP. rug Mar 2012 #6
There's nothing but the judge itself saying it. I smell Backwards B. 2ndAmForComputers Mar 2012 #7
That doesn't even meet Wikipedia's standards. laconicsax Mar 2012 #10
Clicking links is such hard work. rug Mar 2012 #11
So we should personally ask the reporter for the links by e-mail. 2ndAmForComputers Mar 2012 #13
People who don't like judges favoring Muslims? Lots of Islamophobes. dmallind Mar 2012 #12
Judges are supposed to be impartial.. Fumesucker Mar 2012 #14
SUPPOSED to be. Clearly he does favor Muslims. Over atheists at least. dmallind Mar 2012 #16
You gave the impression it was Islamophobic to not agree with favoring Muslims.. Fumesucker Mar 2012 #17
No - not my intent at any rate. Can't see that either, but gotcha. dmallind Mar 2012 #20
Criticism is appropriate, threats are not... Humanist_Activist Mar 2012 #4
There are NO posts with death threats, only the word of the judge. 2ndAmForComputers Mar 2012 #8
Certainly possible... Humanist_Activist Mar 2012 #9
So threats are bad, actual assault OK? Fumesucker Mar 2012 #15
False dichotomy, the Judge made a bad decision, that doesn't warrant threats against him... Humanist_Activist Mar 2012 #18
Just pointing out the random and capricious nature of "justice".. Fumesucker Mar 2012 #19
 

rug

(82,333 posts)
3. I doubt it was Muslims.
Fri Mar 2, 2012, 01:30 PM
Mar 2012

"He said his office received more than 200 phone calls and emails from being criticizing his December ruling.

"In addition, some online posts suggested he should be executed, Martin said."

Who is most likely to be pissed off?

2ndAmForComputers

(3,527 posts)
13. So we should personally ask the reporter for the links by e-mail.
Sat Mar 3, 2012, 02:51 AM
Mar 2012

Not. He wrote very clearly, if succinctly, that these were allegations by the judge.

There's no "there" there. If there were, you would have posted it already.

Backwards goddamn B.

dmallind

(10,437 posts)
12. People who don't like judges favoring Muslims? Lots of Islamophobes.
Sat Mar 3, 2012, 02:22 AM
Mar 2012

And claiming to be one, on tape, in court - even if he changed his story later.

Fumesucker

(45,851 posts)
14. Judges are supposed to be impartial..
Sat Mar 3, 2012, 09:48 AM
Mar 2012

That means they do not favor anyone at all, including Muslims.

 

Humanist_Activist

(7,670 posts)
4. Criticism is appropriate, threats are not...
Fri Mar 2, 2012, 04:39 PM
Mar 2012

I hope that they catch the ones who issued threats and prosecute them to the fullest extent of the law.

 

Humanist_Activist

(7,670 posts)
9. Certainly possible...
Sat Mar 3, 2012, 01:21 AM
Mar 2012

Perhaps I should have clarified, IF such threats were made, those who made them should be investigated and if warranted, prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.

Fumesucker

(45,851 posts)
15. So threats are bad, actual assault OK?
Sat Mar 3, 2012, 09:49 AM
Mar 2012

The Muslim assaulted the atheist and it was the atheist who got punished by a tongue lashing from the judge.

 

Humanist_Activist

(7,670 posts)
18. False dichotomy, the Judge made a bad decision, that doesn't warrant threats against him...
Sat Mar 3, 2012, 03:15 PM
Mar 2012

he should be thrown from the bench.

Fumesucker

(45,851 posts)
19. Just pointing out the random and capricious nature of "justice"..
Sat Mar 3, 2012, 03:28 PM
Mar 2012

America is replete with examples of such randomness and capriciousness.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»Judge in 'Zombie Muhammad...