Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Warren Stupidity

(48,181 posts)
Tue Nov 25, 2014, 06:27 PM Nov 2014

Horrific Violence once again NOT associated with Religion.


Maiduguri (Nigeria) (AFP) - More than 45 people were killed when two female suicide bombers blew themselves up in a crowded market in northeast Nigeria on Tuesday, the latest in a wave of such attacks blamed on Boko Haram.

The explosions in the Borno state capital targeted the same Monday Market area where at least 15 people died on July 1 in a blast also thought to have been carried out by the Islamist militants.

Tuesday's attacks came after the militants seized control of another town in Nigeria's restive northeast, adding to their increasing haul of territory captured in recent months.

http://www.modernghana.com/GhanaHome/image_preview.asp?which=1&menu_id=67&id=NTgyOTk2
18 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Horrific Violence once again NOT associated with Religion. (Original Post) Warren Stupidity Nov 2014 OP
Was the 'not' sarcastic? Erich Bloodaxe BSN Nov 2014 #1
I'm testing Poe's Law. Warren Stupidity Nov 2014 #2
What gets into believers' minds and enables them to act this way? JDDavis Nov 2014 #3
No. And anyone who says different is a hateful bigot. Warren Stupidity Nov 2014 #4
We're probably delusional for thinking religion has anything to do with it. AtheistCrusader Nov 2014 #5
Well you can't prove we are not delusional. Warren Stupidity Nov 2014 #7
Be careful. n/t. bvf Nov 2014 #9
Oh OK, I am sorry I asked such a hateful question. JDDavis Nov 2014 #6
Oh you could easily qualify for a boat pass. That's the right attitude. Warren Stupidity Nov 2014 #8
So you're from NH? JDDavis Nov 2014 #10
What does this even mean? malokvale77 Nov 2014 #11
Sorry, should have put in the Sarcasm symbol JDDavis Nov 2014 #14
It's OK malokvale77 Nov 2014 #16
Poe's law is validated again. Warren Stupidity Nov 2014 #18
I'm going to play devil's advocate and forget a decade or so. Igel Nov 2014 #12
Oh I agree that it is complicated and that religion is a major factor, not the only factor. Warren Stupidity Nov 2014 #13
Don't kill their snark buzz with actual facts. rug Nov 2014 #15
Small steps. bvf Nov 2014 #17

Erich Bloodaxe BSN

(14,733 posts)
1. Was the 'not' sarcastic?
Tue Nov 25, 2014, 06:29 PM
Nov 2014

Since the body of the text refers to them as 'Islamist militants'? (And what's the difference between 'Islamic militants' and 'Islamist militants'?)

 

JDDavis

(725 posts)
6. Oh OK, I am sorry I asked such a hateful question.
Tue Nov 25, 2014, 06:37 PM
Nov 2014

Thank you for setting me right about this. I will never question the authority of religious true believers again.

They must always have a right to be right on any issue. No questions asked.

 

JDDavis

(725 posts)
10. So you're from NH?
Tue Nov 25, 2014, 07:26 PM
Nov 2014

I think you just avoided a crisis, didn't let Scott Brown get back in power,

He's back to Faux Snooze, where he will analyse why he lost....becuase NH voters like you were stupid.

Isn't Brown an Irish Catholic? Did his religion have anything to do with his stances on birth control and abortions?

Does he think he deserves to make lots of money because his body looked so good when he was 20 something?

Fox will tell you, he's a wonderful American, and those stupid liberals in NH defeated a true American icon.

 

JDDavis

(725 posts)
14. Sorry, should have put in the Sarcasm symbol
Tue Nov 25, 2014, 08:52 PM
Nov 2014

Yeah, I make mistakes spelling on the internet, too!


NH voters are as smart as most DU members.

We DO make mistakes spelling, here and there.

malokvale77

(4,879 posts)
16. It's OK
Tue Nov 25, 2014, 10:37 PM
Nov 2014

I have RA, and often post gibberish.

If I knew your posts better, I might have seen the sarcasm.

Igel

(35,320 posts)
12. I'm going to play devil's advocate and forget a decade or so.
Tue Nov 25, 2014, 08:15 PM
Nov 2014

Because this has been going on for a long time, and the progressive response a decade back was the obvious: It's not religious. This was argued long and hard on DU by many, with those saying it was an "Islamic thing" derided and alerted on if they pushed the point too hard. Of course, it's when Bush II was ranting about Islamists and even though "Islamist" is a good translation of a neologism first found in Arabic writings about political Islam some DUers at the time took offense and said, "Sorry, not a word, can't be a word, it's racist against Muslims."

Instead the problem in Nigeria was obviously urban/rural, merchant and manufacturing versus pastoralist. It matched what Marx said.

It wasn't religious, it was ethnic, since the Fula in this area (Hausa in others) have been spreading south for the last few centuries and running into other tribes or ethnic groups. Which matched the racial and ethnic politics of the US.

This was the way to make it not religious. And, in fact, there's another facet that wasn't brought out much then, "indigenous" and "endocentric" versus "Westernizing". Which corresponds nicely to the ideal of indigenous vs. colonizer, sort of a marginal kind of trendiness in political thought these days, but not lacking a certain cachet.

(Back then I believed it was mostly religious, but it really is hard to separate out the cultural and ethnic from the religious and IMHO you're stuck going with how the practioners of the violence portray it--all the aspects are present, but which is most salient in the minds of those doing the killing, maiming, 'sploding. Note also that the Fula have said at various times in the last three hundred years as they fought against tribes in the south and expanded their range that they were, indeed, waging jihad. Though again it's hard to distinguish between seeking justification for ethnic and cultural warfare in religion and having religion be the primary reason, esp. when religion is often so closely wedded to culture and ethnicity. Look at European history for that--reasoning that leads to wide condemnation of the European Church but somehow exculpates Muslims. Veddy strange.)

 

Warren Stupidity

(48,181 posts)
13. Oh I agree that it is complicated and that religion is a major factor, not the only factor.
Tue Nov 25, 2014, 08:50 PM
Nov 2014

The division in Nigeria between the Islamic Hausa in the north and west and the Christian and animist tribes in the south and east has a very long and bloody history, including for example the Biafra War. Ignoring the religious element of the current violence is shameful. Painting anyone who even brings it up as a bigot is repulsive. And then Nigeria is just one of many examples. Tunisia is struggling to keep its tentative hold on secular democracy and the main threat to that comes, of course, from Islamic extremists acting both within and outside of the political process. The horror shows continue in Iraq, Syria, Afghanistan and elsewhere and only the deliberately blind can assert that religion is not a major factor.

 

bvf

(6,604 posts)
17. Small steps.
Wed Nov 26, 2014, 02:17 AM
Nov 2014

"Though again it's hard to distinguish between seeking justification for ethnic and cultural warfare in religion and having religion be the primary reason, esp. when religion is often so closely wedded to culture and ethnicity."

The answer seems to be to try to divorce religion from culture and ethnicity then. As a Caucasian raised Roman Catholic before reason kicked in, I can state with pride that I've done my part in raising a sensible, atheist child.

A small contribution, I know, but a step in the right direction.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»Horrific Violence once ag...