Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

cbayer

(146,218 posts)
Tue Dec 2, 2014, 11:33 AM Dec 2014

American Atheists launch provocative campaign in religious Deep South

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/11265926/American-Atheists-launch-provocative-campaign-in-religious-Deep-South.html


The atheist bilboard also carries the message "Dear Santa, All I want for Christmas is to skip church! I'm too old for fairy tales"

By Peter Foster, Washington4:56PM GMT 01 Dec 2014

Atheist activists are taking their campaigns to the Bible Belt this Christmas with a provocative billboard campaign that is expected to stir controversy in America's religious heartlands.

The giant advertising hoardings in the Tennessee cities of Memphis, Nashville, St. Louis and Fort Smith, Arkansas show a mischievous-looking young girl writing her letter to Father Christmas: "Dear Santa, All I want for Christmas is to skip church! I'm too old for fairy tales," she writes.

The advertising campaign by the American Atheists group will run until Christmas Eve and is the first time the group has aimed its anti-God adverts directly at residential religious areas, having previously targeted urban audiences in big venues such as Times Square in New York.

"Today's adults have no obligation to pretend to believe the lies their parents believed. It's OK to admit that your parents were wrong about God, and it's definitely OK to tell your children the truth," said David Silverman, the group's president, as he launched the campaign.

more at link
68 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
American Atheists launch provocative campaign in religious Deep South (Original Post) cbayer Dec 2014 OP
Maybe Ink Man Dec 2014 #1
Funny how when atheists have tried to help, kind religious folks like yourself turned them away. trotsky Dec 2014 #2
And would you say the same edhopper Dec 2014 #3
I would definitely say the same to them…. and more. Well, except the llamas. cbayer Dec 2014 #6
Où est la tête du lama blanc? rug Dec 2014 #9
La tête du lama blanc est enterré dans le sable. cbayer Dec 2014 #13
No mas llamas. edhopper Dec 2014 #22
You have to admit that was pretty funny…. and clever. cbayer Dec 2014 #24
Good laughs edhopper Dec 2014 #25
The first billboard is creepy for reasons having little to do... stone space Dec 2014 #47
Nothing fails like Prayer. AtheistCrusader Dec 2014 #4
But being a jerk always succeeds. Odin2005 Dec 2014 #62
Do you say the same thing about the ACLU? Goblinmonger Dec 2014 #20
Dupe Warren Stupidity Dec 2014 #5
That's because the rest of the billboard advertises their convention. rug Dec 2014 #10
It is their image and they get to decide how it's used, right? Goblinmonger Dec 2014 #21
Not to mention the bandwith theft. rug Dec 2014 #23
Don't deflect. Should they have the right to how their image is distributed? Goblinmonger Dec 2014 #26
This whole stupid subthread is a deflection. rug Dec 2014 #29
Cropping the picture kind of changes things a bit. Goblinmonger Dec 2014 #30
Do you want to discuss copyright law? rug Dec 2014 #38
You started this with a snide comment about why they are restricting use. Goblinmonger Dec 2014 #46
And you responded with a lame diversion about copyright infringement. rug Dec 2014 #52
I think it is just as wrong for atheists to target children as it is for theists to target children. djean111 Dec 2014 #7
Good point. David Silverman's judgment is questionable, imo, cbayer Dec 2014 #8
I didn't interpret it that way edhopper Dec 2014 #11
Some folks have a need to equate the actions of "both sides." trotsky Dec 2014 #12
Well, I guess it could also be interpreted as calling all religious believers children cbayer Dec 2014 #14
If you want to equate myths with fairy tales edhopper Dec 2014 #15
That's so insulting and arrogant. But you knew that. cbayer Dec 2014 #16
Actually it is calling adult religious believers adults who believe in fairy tales. Warren Stupidity Dec 2014 #17
So is everyone so terribly offended at this message also offended at Warren Stupidity Dec 2014 #18
Of course not, Warren. trotsky Dec 2014 #19
Well that sure will get a lot of understanding and upaloopa Dec 2014 #27
It's about letting current atheists know Goblinmonger Dec 2014 #32
I always thought of atheists as enligntened. Now you make me doubt that idea. upaloopa Dec 2014 #34
I don't understand your point. Goblinmonger Dec 2014 #48
I went through those issues. I was raised Catholic upaloopa Dec 2014 #57
You do realize it might be harder for some people, right? Goblinmonger Dec 2014 #58
It is hard for everyone. I understand that upaloopa Dec 2014 #59
Do you have the same empathy for those who might go the other way? cbayer Dec 2014 #60
what us atheists need is show bizz tacky snazz olddots Dec 2014 #28
Are you not aware that this is already happening? cbayer Dec 2014 #31
You equate this edhopper Dec 2014 #33
Have you seen it? What do you find interesting about my comparison? cbayer Dec 2014 #35
That you equate these gatherings edhopper Dec 2014 #36
I don't equate these gatherings with televangelism at all. cbayer Dec 2014 #37
One of us misread response #28 edhopper Dec 2014 #40
One of us read only part of it and that would be you. cbayer Dec 2014 #50
Why would you edhopper Dec 2014 #41
Er, I did that because I am not convinced that some of the ones cbayer Dec 2014 #51
Dear Lord! goldent Dec 2014 #67
Really bad Photoshop. okasha Dec 2014 #39
The hair gives it away Cartoonist Dec 2014 #42
Right on both counts. okasha Dec 2014 #43
Cute kid. Silly message. (nt) stone space Dec 2014 #44
How dare those nasty atheists edhopper Dec 2014 #45
It's a silly billboard about nothing of importance. stone space Dec 2014 #49
Because there are atheists deep in the 'bible belt' that are pretty isolated, and so incredibly AtheistCrusader Dec 2014 #53
Then why not a billboard with that message? stone space Dec 2014 #54
Some of us have figured out edhopper Dec 2014 #55
It is a billboard with that message. AtheistCrusader Dec 2014 #56
This will only serve to make them look like assholes. Odin2005 Dec 2014 #61
Because there are no affluent edhopper Dec 2014 #63
It doesn't have to be direct deprivation. Odin2005 Dec 2014 #65
Well, I've seen worse, but basically, I agree. stone space Dec 2014 #64
And if you were religious skepticscott Dec 2014 #68
Interesting how trolling has spread from the Internet to billboards. goldent Dec 2014 #66
 

Ink Man

(171 posts)
1. Maybe
Tue Dec 2, 2014, 11:46 AM
Dec 2014

that money could be used to feed the hungry or find a room or two for the homeless. Looking at their web site they spend all their funds on law suits. I'll pray for them.

edhopper

(33,589 posts)
3. And would you say the same
Tue Dec 2, 2014, 12:14 PM
Dec 2014

Last edited Tue Dec 2, 2014, 05:01 PM - Edit history (1)

to the fine religious folks who put these up?

[img][/img]

[img][/img]

[img][/img]

[img][/img]


Glad you don't think separation of Church and State is important, others would disagree.

 

stone space

(6,498 posts)
47. The first billboard is creepy for reasons having little to do...
Wed Dec 3, 2014, 11:18 AM
Dec 2014

...with either religion or atheism, and is quite seriously disturbing on several levels.

The bottom 3 are just silly messages (much like the silly message in the OP), and could probably be improved somewhat by adding a picture of a cute kid to distract from the silliness of the message (although the one signed by God Himself does have an element of humor, I suppose).

Even a bad Photoshop job would improve the last 3.


 

Warren Stupidity

(48,181 posts)
5. Dupe
Tue Dec 2, 2014, 12:23 PM
Dec 2014

Just so you know

By the way AA explicitly requests that the entire billboard picture be displayed, not just the left hand side.


Click for full-sized image. Additional photographs of the actual billboards are forthcoming. Check this page for updates. American Atheists grants permission to press to reproduce and redistribute these billboard images under the conditions that absolutely no cropping or editing is performed and no overlays cover, hide, conceal, or distort any part of the images (including the title bar with website at the bottom), and that American Atheists is credited for providing it.

http://news.atheists.org/2014/12/01/atheists-promote-skip-church-christmas-billboards-in-south/

You might want to not propagate a direct violation of this restriction.
 

rug

(82,333 posts)
10. That's because the rest of the billboard advertises their convention.
Tue Dec 2, 2014, 12:59 PM
Dec 2014

In the meantime, you should complain to The Telegraph which cropped it.

 

Goblinmonger

(22,340 posts)
21. It is their image and they get to decide how it's used, right?
Tue Dec 2, 2014, 03:49 PM
Dec 2014

DU has had copyright issues in the past. Probably don't want to cause potentially more for them.

 

Goblinmonger

(22,340 posts)
26. Don't deflect. Should they have the right to how their image is distributed?
Tue Dec 2, 2014, 05:15 PM
Dec 2014

Your eyeroller seems to indicate you don't think so.

I have often thought cbayer should not hotlink to images, but that's another discussion.

 

Goblinmonger

(22,340 posts)
30. Cropping the picture kind of changes things a bit.
Tue Dec 2, 2014, 05:51 PM
Dec 2014

And they don't want people to do it.

Should they have the right to determine how their image is used?

 

Goblinmonger

(22,340 posts)
46. You started this with a snide comment about why they are restricting use.
Wed Dec 3, 2014, 11:17 AM
Dec 2014

I have asked you repeated if they have the right to have their image used as they want. That question still stands.

Do they have the right to control the way their image is used? Why is that so damned hard for you to answer?

 

rug

(82,333 posts)
52. And you responded with a lame diversion about copyright infringement.
Wed Dec 3, 2014, 11:41 AM
Dec 2014

Do you want to discuss copyright law?

 

djean111

(14,255 posts)
7. I think it is just as wrong for atheists to target children as it is for theists to target children.
Tue Dec 2, 2014, 12:50 PM
Dec 2014

cbayer

(146,218 posts)
8. Good point. David Silverman's judgment is questionable, imo,
Tue Dec 2, 2014, 12:52 PM
Dec 2014

and I think he often hurts the cause he says he so strongly supports.

edhopper

(33,589 posts)
11. I didn't interpret it that way
Tue Dec 2, 2014, 01:08 PM
Dec 2014

I though it's; you aren't a child anymore writing letters to Santa, time to give up other fairy tales.

It's for adults, not children.

trotsky

(49,533 posts)
12. Some folks have a need to equate the actions of "both sides."
Tue Dec 2, 2014, 01:52 PM
Dec 2014

Thus the forced indoctrination of children into religion becomes the same thing as putting up a billboard. Even though, as you pointed out, the billboard is clearly intended for adults who are allowed to make up their own minds.

cbayer

(146,218 posts)
14. Well, I guess it could also be interpreted as calling all religious believers children
Tue Dec 2, 2014, 02:12 PM
Dec 2014

who believe in fairy tales.

You know, I fully support messages that encourage non-believers to come our or tell them that they are not alone.

But I find this kind of message as offensive as the one's you listed.

edhopper

(33,589 posts)
15. If you want to equate myths with fairy tales
Tue Dec 2, 2014, 02:51 PM
Dec 2014

I guess that's true. Though I wouldn't go as far as calling them children, just time to put away childish things.

cbayer

(146,218 posts)
16. That's so insulting and arrogant. But you knew that.
Tue Dec 2, 2014, 02:53 PM
Dec 2014

And so does Mr. Silverman. It gets him attention, too.

 

Warren Stupidity

(48,181 posts)
17. Actually it is calling adult religious believers adults who believe in fairy tales.
Tue Dec 2, 2014, 03:01 PM
Dec 2014

At least get the actual insult right.

 

Warren Stupidity

(48,181 posts)
18. So is everyone so terribly offended at this message also offended at
Tue Dec 2, 2014, 03:03 PM
Dec 2014

the many religious messages this time of year?

trotsky

(49,533 posts)
19. Of course not, Warren.
Tue Dec 2, 2014, 03:22 PM
Dec 2014

"Jesus is the reason for the season" is just people expressing their precious, special religious beliefs (that everyone else is wrong).

With this billboard, a group of atheists are expressing their opinion (that believers are wrong).

So you see, it's totally different and atheists really need to be brought out into the square and flayed again.

This is the gospel according to cbayer, chapter 15, verses 22-27.

 

Goblinmonger

(22,340 posts)
32. It's about letting current atheists know
Tue Dec 2, 2014, 06:23 PM
Dec 2014

that they aren't alone and it's OK to be out. That you don't need to go to religious ceremonies just because tradition.

upaloopa

(11,417 posts)
34. I always thought of atheists as enligntened. Now you make me doubt that idea.
Tue Dec 2, 2014, 06:30 PM
Dec 2014

Last edited Wed Dec 3, 2014, 01:16 PM - Edit history (1)

What is Enlightenment? – Immanuel Kant


Enlightenment is man’s emergence from his self-imposed immaturity. Immaturity is the inability to use one’s understanding without guidance from another. This immaturity is self-imposed when its cause lies not in lack of understanding, but in lack of resolve and courage to use it without guidance from another. Sapere Aude! [dare to know] “Have courage to use your own understanding!”–that is the motto of enlightenment.
http://www.artoftheory.com/what-is-enlightenment_immanuel-kant/

 

Goblinmonger

(22,340 posts)
48. I don't understand your point.
Wed Dec 3, 2014, 11:20 AM
Dec 2014

Do you not think that there are people that are atheists who feel alone? Especially in the south? Who feel like they need to go to religious ceremonies because that is what their family does or what everyone around them has done? Who feel bad because they are leaving the religion they were raised in behind?

Every atheist is automatically ok with everything and can't be going through any issues?

upaloopa

(11,417 posts)
57. I went through those issues. I was raised Catholic
Wed Dec 3, 2014, 01:19 PM
Dec 2014

I was taught that I was going to hell if I rejected that faith. I chose to reject that faith and think for myself. That is what you have to do. Period.

 

Goblinmonger

(22,340 posts)
58. You do realize it might be harder for some people, right?
Wed Dec 3, 2014, 01:24 PM
Dec 2014

I mean, you do feel empathy, yes?

Would you talk to someone suffering from depression and say, "Hey, you just need to choose to be happy. That is what you have to do. Period"? Sometimes people have a hard time with this. Sometimes this might mean that you lose family members. There are a myriad of problems that could go with the realization that you don't believe anymore. To reject those problems and just say, in essence, "Get over it" isn't really being helpful.

upaloopa

(11,417 posts)
59. It is hard for everyone. I understand that
Wed Dec 3, 2014, 01:31 PM
Dec 2014

That is why I have respect for people who do it.
That is why I posted what Immamuel Kant wrote about it.
Google Immanuel Kant what is enlightenment and read the whole thing.
I was in college in a Catholic college when I was told I could not study Kant in philosophy class. The profs went out on strike over it. Yes it is hard but we have to stand up to religion.

cbayer

(146,218 posts)
60. Do you have the same empathy for those who might go the other way?
Wed Dec 3, 2014, 01:51 PM
Dec 2014

Do you also think that belief might not be a choice?

While I realize that in this culture, being an atheist is generally the bigger challenge, that is not necessarily true everywhere.

I agree that "Get over it" isn't really being helpful.

 

olddots

(10,237 posts)
28. what us atheists need is show bizz tacky snazz
Tue Dec 2, 2014, 05:21 PM
Dec 2014

Some atheist rock bands and tele atheist guys begging for money wearing rug samples and silk suits .But wait we will catch up give us a few thousand years .

edhopper

(33,589 posts)
36. That you equate these gatherings
Tue Dec 2, 2014, 06:44 PM
Dec 2014

with charlatans whose main occupation seem to be asking for money.

If you wanted to compare it with regular sunday services that is one thing, but equating them with televangelists says a lot about where you stand.

cbayer

(146,218 posts)
37. I don't equate these gatherings with televangelism at all.
Tue Dec 2, 2014, 06:51 PM
Dec 2014

He laid out some things that he apparently is not aware are happening in some areas of the atheists community. I pointed out that some of these things are actually happening.

You pulled out one small part of that, the televangelism, then made some wild claim that I was equating them.

BTW, I'm not fully convinced that some of these people are not in fact charlatans. Are you?

What exactly does it say about where I stand, ed? Since there is a well established history here of you reading things into what I say that don't at all reflect my position, I would urge you to ask me where I stand instead of making more erroneous assumptions.

edhopper

(33,589 posts)
40. One of us misread response #28
Tue Dec 2, 2014, 09:12 PM
Dec 2014

To me he is obviously talkng about slick televangelist.

What do you think he was talking about?

cbayer

(146,218 posts)
50. One of us read only part of it and that would be you.
Wed Dec 3, 2014, 11:29 AM
Dec 2014

what us atheists need is show bizz tacky snazz

Some atheist rock bands and tele atheist guys begging for money wearing rug samples and silk suits .

edhopper

(33,589 posts)
41. Why would you
Tue Dec 2, 2014, 09:17 PM
Dec 2014

Bring up any of them being charlatins absent of any evidence.

Not convinced? Why are you not convinced? Is there a single fact to point to that?
That is such a "when did you stop..." Statement.

Yes, your bias is quite clear.

cbayer

(146,218 posts)
51. Er, I did that because I am not convinced that some of the ones
Wed Dec 3, 2014, 11:33 AM
Dec 2014

I have read about are not charlatans. Why else would I bring it up?

It's my opinion based on some articles that I have read about some people that are making their careers out of being atheist evangelists. Some of these guys were once christian evangelists but have seen the light.

This area is ripe for charlatans and non-belief is not an exception.

What is my bias, ed? I asked you this before and you haven't answered it? One would think that you want me to be biased or something, but why would that be? Could it have to do with your own bias?

 

stone space

(6,498 posts)
49. It's a silly billboard about nothing of importance.
Wed Dec 3, 2014, 11:23 AM
Dec 2014

The question is not "how dare they?", but rather, "why dare they?", the same question that could be reasonably asked about the bottom 3 billboards in your post above. (The top one is in a different category, altogether.)


AtheistCrusader

(33,982 posts)
53. Because there are atheists deep in the 'bible belt' that are pretty isolated, and so incredibly
Wed Dec 3, 2014, 11:42 AM
Dec 2014

outnumbered they probably feel abandoned.

This is for them. Not *you*.

 

stone space

(6,498 posts)
54. Then why not a billboard with that message?
Wed Dec 3, 2014, 11:46 AM
Dec 2014

Instead, they go for the silly, and ignore those isolated atheists.

edhopper

(33,589 posts)
55. Some of us have figured out
Wed Dec 3, 2014, 11:56 AM
Dec 2014

that is exactly who they are addressing and figure those isolated atheists are smart enough to figure it out too.
That it's a sentiment that they can agree with and be free from the pantomime that Christmas services are for them.

Odin2005

(53,521 posts)
61. This will only serve to make them look like assholes.
Sat Dec 6, 2014, 12:03 PM
Dec 2014

This is the kind of edgy, insulting shit that makes me ashamed of calling myself an Atheist.

The ONLY way of getting rid of religion is by getting rid of the material causes of suffering that causes people to use religion to self-medicate that suffering. Why does it seem like it is only us Marxists who get this?

edhopper

(33,589 posts)
63. Because there are no affluent
Sat Dec 6, 2014, 12:21 PM
Dec 2014

religious people?
I don't think you Marxists get it at all. It goes much deeper than simple material suffering.

Odin2005

(53,521 posts)
65. It doesn't have to be direct deprivation.
Sat Dec 6, 2014, 01:04 PM
Dec 2014

A member of the ruling class can feel existential angst about suffering in the world that his/her own class is causing.

 

stone space

(6,498 posts)
64. Well, I've seen worse, but basically, I agree.
Sat Dec 6, 2014, 12:30 PM
Dec 2014

The religious billboards posted above attacking evolution, the big bang, and atheism, (and even that creepy billboard threatening a civil war!) are a luxury that they can afford.

But for atheists, we are just too small in number for such luxuries.

For us, every billboard attacking religion represents a lost opportunity for pointing out some positive aspects of atheism.

A lost opportunity squandered for the momentary fleeting pleasure of making a petty insult.

At least there's a cute kid in it, so maybe the pettininess won't be noticed by everybody, and some will just smile as they glance at it whizzing by.

 

skepticscott

(13,029 posts)
68. And if you were religious
Sat Dec 6, 2014, 02:06 PM
Dec 2014

I could point to a hundred times more edgy, insulting shit that would make you ashamed to call yourself religious. Some of it gets posted here every day, in fact. And Marxists in the 20th Century gave you a lot to be ashamed of, too (yeah, we know...those weren't REAL Marxists...don't even go there).

Guess you're stuck with being ashamed no matter what you call yourself, dude.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»American Atheists launch ...