Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Warren Stupidity

(48,181 posts)
Tue Feb 24, 2015, 07:05 PM Feb 2015

Pope speaks, finds foot in mouth once again.

Mexico has registered a rare diplomatic protest with the Vatican over comments by Pope Francis warning that his native Argentina was in danger of “Mexicanisation” by drug gangs.

The comment came in an email the pontiff wrote to an Argentinian friend, Gustavo Vera, who heads an NGO called “Alameda” which is involved in combating organised crime and human trafficking.


“I hope we (in Argentina) can avoid Mexicanisation,” the pope wrote in what was a reference to Mexico’s problems with warring drugs gangs.

http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/feb/24/mexico-protests-vatican-pope-drug-comments

28 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Pope speaks, finds foot in mouth once again. (Original Post) Warren Stupidity Feb 2015 OP
The Pope has GOP syndrome Politicalboi Feb 2015 #1
He probably shouldn't have said that edhopper Feb 2015 #2
it's not just corruption. okasha Feb 2015 #3
Yes edhopper Feb 2015 #4
No, they profit because of the drug war Fumesucker Feb 2015 #6
That's what I was saying edhopper Feb 2015 #8
Not even close Fumesucker Feb 2015 #9
Yes edhopper Feb 2015 #10
That's still the wrong framing.. Fumesucker Feb 2015 #13
I agree edhopper Feb 2015 #14
When you frame it that way it reinforces the meme that the problem is drugs... Fumesucker Feb 2015 #18
It's demand for illegal drugs edhopper Feb 2015 #20
Then people immediately think "All we need to do is stop the demand for illegal drugs" Fumesucker Feb 2015 #21
or edhopper Feb 2015 #23
Drugs are illegal because they are bad.. Fumesucker Feb 2015 #24
so why is frank blaming mexicans? Warren Stupidity Feb 2015 #11
You'll have to ask him. edhopper Feb 2015 #12
How fucked up by cartels would Mexico be if we hadn't enabled the cartels with our war on drugs? Warren Stupidity Feb 2015 #15
Which implies Frank doesn't have a damn clue about all this.. Fumesucker Feb 2015 #16
We will have to disagree here. edhopper Feb 2015 #17
"The word is unfortunate"? Goblinmonger Feb 2015 #7
We get upset about the pope attacking homosexuals, transgendered people, and now an entire nation... trotsky Feb 2015 #19
Yes, it really is amazing skepticscott Feb 2015 #22
Oh Jeebus... trotsky Feb 2015 #25
Yes, look how they lost their shit skepticscott Feb 2015 #26
It's very sad Dorian Gray Feb 2015 #27
True that edhopper Feb 2015 #28
Way to go, popey. n/t trotsky Feb 2015 #5
 

Politicalboi

(15,189 posts)
1. The Pope has GOP syndrome
Tue Feb 24, 2015, 07:13 PM
Feb 2015

Just say what's on your mind, nothing bad will happen till it does. Just ask Rudy.

edhopper

(33,625 posts)
2. He probably shouldn't have said that
Tue Feb 24, 2015, 07:55 PM
Feb 2015

but Mexico does have an immense problem with corruption from the Drug Cartels.

okasha

(11,573 posts)
3. it's not just corruption.
Wed Feb 25, 2015, 12:04 AM
Feb 2015

There are places in Mexico where a state of war exists both between gangs and between gangs and the government. The word is unfortunate; the fact is tragic.

Fumesucker

(45,851 posts)
6. No, they profit because of the drug war
Wed Feb 25, 2015, 12:35 PM
Feb 2015

When was the last time you saw a shootout between liquor store owners?



Fumesucker

(45,851 posts)
9. Not even close
Wed Feb 25, 2015, 01:08 PM
Feb 2015

It's our politicians, both Democratic and Republican who fuel the drug war and make inevitable the violence of the cartels.

edhopper

(33,625 posts)
10. Yes
Wed Feb 25, 2015, 01:09 PM
Feb 2015

I am agreeing with you. We have made drugs criminal and the demand for them in the US is what drives the Cartels.

Fumesucker

(45,851 posts)
13. That's still the wrong framing..
Wed Feb 25, 2015, 01:14 PM
Feb 2015

The demand would be there irrespective of the legal status, it's the illegal status of some drugs that drives the violence.

A black market has no mechanism for settling disputes other than violence, liquor distributors go to court if they have grievances against each other, they don't gun each other down in the street any more like they did when alcohol was illegal.

edhopper

(33,625 posts)
14. I agree
Wed Feb 25, 2015, 01:16 PM
Feb 2015

You are just reading to much into my short replies.

You are looking for an argument where none exists.

Fumesucker

(45,851 posts)
18. When you frame it that way it reinforces the meme that the problem is drugs...
Wed Feb 25, 2015, 01:24 PM
Feb 2015

When it's actually a political problem.

It's a really difficult concept to get across to a lot of people and framing the discussion to show what is the actual problem is extremely important.

edhopper

(33,625 posts)
20. It's demand for illegal drugs
Wed Feb 25, 2015, 01:28 PM
Feb 2015

if the drugs were not illegal, the Cartels would not be able to operate as they do.

I haven't seen the data, but i would think they aren't very active in the Pot trade in Wash. or Colo.

You think I am saying we just have to stop people from using drugs, I am not.

Fumesucker

(45,851 posts)
21. Then people immediately think "All we need to do is stop the demand for illegal drugs"
Wed Feb 25, 2015, 01:34 PM
Feb 2015

I did drug war debate for a long time and getting people to see the actual political problem is difficult enough without reinforcing what they think they already know, which is exactly what the framing you are using does.

Not trying to beat up on you but that framing is far too easily taken the wrong way because that's what people have been trained to think anyway and it feeds into their existing prejudices.

Fumesucker

(45,851 posts)
24. Drugs are illegal because they are bad..
Wed Feb 25, 2015, 01:46 PM
Feb 2015

That's what most people think and getting them to change that mindset is damn difficult.

Pot is obviously considerably safer than alcohol to anyone who pays attention to medical literature and it's changing the legal status has been a huge battle that isn't really won yet. I have family members who are intelligent medical professionals and still think pot is far worse than alcohol.

edhopper

(33,625 posts)
12. You'll have to ask him.
Wed Feb 25, 2015, 01:12 PM
Feb 2015

We shouldn't deny that Mexico is pretty fucked up right now.

I am saying the fault lies in both countries.

 

Warren Stupidity

(48,181 posts)
15. How fucked up by cartels would Mexico be if we hadn't enabled the cartels with our war on drugs?
Wed Feb 25, 2015, 01:17 PM
Feb 2015

It would be approximately zero fucked up. The fault is approximately 100% ours. Our misguided stupid destructive draconian drug war, now a totally corrupt government/corporate partnership, is responsible for this mess, not "mexicans".

 

Goblinmonger

(22,340 posts)
7. "The word is unfortunate"?
Wed Feb 25, 2015, 12:39 PM
Feb 2015

That's all you got?

There is some Grade A, Olympic level ethnocentrism at work here. "Mexicanization"? My daughter did a semester abroad in Argentina and very clearly saw this level of bigotry in Argentina. That the Pope feels the same is not surprising since he is from there.

But to not call him out on that and just say he had a bad word choice (while another thread has a lot of traction in this group in which people are losing their shit about something Dawkins didn't even say) is some Grade A, Olympic level hypocrisy. Well done. Just when I didn't think you could top yourself in your contortions to be an apologist for Pope Awesome I.

trotsky

(49,533 posts)
19. We get upset about the pope attacking homosexuals, transgendered people, and now an entire nation...
Wed Feb 25, 2015, 01:24 PM
Feb 2015

and we're just anti-religious bigots.

Dawkins says children shouldn't be subjected to religious indoctrination in schools, and he's a monster who wants to take children away from their parents and raise them in atheism camps.

Yup. Just another day in the Religion group.

 

skepticscott

(13,029 posts)
22. Yes, it really is amazing
Wed Feb 25, 2015, 01:35 PM
Feb 2015

How long the religionistas can go on in a thread, slamming Dawkins for things he didn't even say (based on an OP which deliberately misquoted him), but they are silent as the grave when something like this comes up. Or even worse, they try to defend it or gloss it over.

Any doubt that if an atheist in here used the term "Mexicanization", our friend here and many of her cronies would have a complete meltdown, accusing that person and anyone who didn't "denounce" them of being a "bigoted asshole" (as one of our Mexican residents is prone to do).

trotsky

(49,533 posts)
25. Oh Jeebus...
Wed Feb 25, 2015, 01:49 PM
Feb 2015

Imagine if Dawkins had used that term.

DU would explode from the wailing and gnashing of teeth in the Religion group.

 

skepticscott

(13,029 posts)
26. Yes, look how they lost their shit
Wed Feb 25, 2015, 02:06 PM
Feb 2015

when he spoke the truth about the intellectual decline of the Islamic world (over which he expressed regret). Just think what a froth of outrage they could conjure up over something he didn't say.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»Pope speaks, finds foot i...