Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

rug

(82,333 posts)
Sun Jan 1, 2017, 10:22 AM Jan 2017

Federal Judge Says Doctors Can Refuse To Treat Trans Patients Based On Religious Beliefs

Texas AG Ken Paxton, U.S. District Judge Reed O'Connor Strike Again

by John Wright
December 31, 2016 6:24 PM

A rabidly anti-LGBT federal judge in Texas has blocked the Obama administration from implementing a rule that prohibits discrimination against transgender people and women seeking abortion-related treatment under the Affordable Care Act.

U.S. District Judge Reed O'Connor on Saturday granted a nationwide injunction halting enforcement of the nondiscrimination rule, which was set to take effect Sunday, The Washington Blade reports. The injunction comes in response to a lawsuit filed in October by Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton on behalf of several states and religiously affiliated health care providers. The plaintiffs allege the nondiscrimination rule violates the Administrative Procedure Act and the Religious Freedom Restoration Act.

“The federal government has no right to force Texans to pay for medical procedures designed to change a person’s sex," Paxton said in a statement at the time. "I am disappointed in the Obama Administration’s lack of consideration for medical professionals who believe that engaging in such procedures or treatment violates their Hippocratic Oath, their conscience, or their personal religious beliefs, which are protected by the Constitution and federal law.”

Mara Keisling, executive director for the National Center for Transgender Equality, called O'Connor's injunction “another predictable, baseless ruling by a judge who state officials sought out specifically because he could be relied on to deliver a ruling hostile to transgender people."

http://www.thenewcivilrightsmovement.com/johnwright/federal_judge_says_doctors_can_refuse_to_treat_trans_patients_based_on_religious_beliefs

46 page Order: http://files.eqcf.org/cases/716-cv-00108-62/

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Federal Judge Says Doctors Can Refuse To Treat Trans Patients Based On Religious Beliefs (Original Post) rug Jan 2017 OP
More hatred, they just love inflecting hatred and persecution on others. n/t RKP5637 Jan 2017 #1
Hatred in the name of religious freedom to...wait for it...hate Docreed2003 Jan 2017 #2
Great post! rug Jan 2017 #3

Docreed2003

(16,863 posts)
2. Hatred in the name of religious freedom to...wait for it...hate
Sun Jan 1, 2017, 11:06 AM
Jan 2017

I had a patient last year who was hospitalized with complications from a terminal disease. She was a trans woman and due to her disease process and complications, she had to cease with her hormone therapy that she had been taking regularly. Because of this she had some rather "masculine" features and, to make matters worse, her insurance and ID names didn't match so she was admitted under her male birth name. When we made rounds that morning, a medical student on my service, apparently, thought it would be cute to say her name and gesture with quotation marks as she said her name followed by the patient's birth name. I stopped rounds and clarified for myself what was going on and said "Under no circumstances is anyone on this service to refer to this patient as anything other than HER name...am I clear on that?" After rounds, I took the medical student aside and had a conversation with them about their actions and what they could do to make up for their offensive actions to keep them from receiving a formal disciplinary report with their medical school. The patient died on our service, but she died with dignity and how she wanted to be known. That happened in deep blue RI...I can only imagine how similar situations play out in redder states. The issue of trans rights is so new for some people that it's easier for them to make crass comments and demean people rather than understand the real struggle that trans people deal with. Compassion and empathy are on too short of supply in this country, and I attribute that to many things: the rise of the evangelical..Me focused....prosperity gospel, the Ayn Randian transformation of a significant portion of the population, and lack of education. There may be more John Galts than Atticus Finchs, but I'll always try to be more like Finch...hopefully others will as well.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»Federal Judge Says Doctor...