Religion
Related: About this forumDoes Contemporary Christian Music Suck?
by Don Lacey on May. 01, 2012
Heres the latest opinion from Jim Wilson:
Does Contemporary Christian Music Suck?
Cant you see youre not making Christianity any better, youre just making rock n roll worse?
-Hank Hill
Does Christian music suck? That may depend how one defines Christian Music. For example, I do not believe Johnny Cashs music sucks. Despite being an Atheist, I enjoy the vast majority of it, very much, and yet, Johnny Cash was a Christian and much of his music dealt with explicitly Christian topics. This is true of many American artists, whose music often deals with explicitly Christian matters, but is still enjoyable. Spiritual music is an important part of our American musical heritage and many artists have been able to draw upon heritage to great effect.
http://tucsoncitizen.com/freethought-arizona/2012/05/01/does-contemporary-christian-music-suck/
Next question? (and to say that Johnny Cash is Christian music is just...wrong)
Common Sense Party
(14,139 posts)Johnny was a serious Christian. I love his faith-based songs.
Goblinmonger
(22,340 posts)If we want to redefine what "Christian Music" means in pop culture, then fine. But as it is used, Christian artists now are mostly musical hacks that can't make it in the music scene.
Common Sense Party
(14,139 posts)defined by nor limited to the current slew of talent-deprived marketing strategies that are passing for "artists" today.
Goblinmonger
(22,340 posts)And we seem to agree on that answer.
Common Sense Party
(14,139 posts)You mentioned nothing about "contemporary" in that statement.
Johnny Cash definitely recorded some wonderful Christian music. That is the full extent of my point and our disagreement.
deucemagnet
(4,549 posts)and show just how many Johnny Cash songs were about murder, theft, spending time in prison, and infidelity. Specifically, the infidelity between the then-married Cash and the then-married June Carter. But hey, let's put all of that in the Christian blind spot and call Johny's music "Christian". Hell, Christians should be so lucky. If Johnny Cash's music were truly Christian, the genre would be much more popular.
Common Sense Party
(14,139 posts)It's idiotic to say that the ones about redemption are somehow not Christian songs when they clearly were.
Dorian Gray
(13,496 posts)and his music may have been inspired by religion, but you will not find his music in the Christian music section of any record store. No way.
Christian music sucks.
deucemagnet
(4,549 posts)Last edited Fri May 4, 2012, 03:59 AM - Edit history (1)
I'll just sit here and bask in the image of Christian love that he projects, idiotically.
I don't know why this image didn't sow in my original post, but here it is.
BlueState
(642 posts)Johnny Cash created great music, much of it inspired by his Christian faith. Thus it is Christian music that
does not suck.
However, there is a genre of modern popular music know as "Christian Contemporary" which by-and-large
sucks.
Thus the point "CCM" doesn't suck because it is Christian but because it is mass produced garbage.
Goblinmonger
(22,340 posts)It sucks because of the same reason that the winner of American Idol is never the best singer of the bunch. It's because the audience it is aimed at are musical buffoons that wouldn't know good music if it bit them in the ass. Yes, go ahead and call me a musical elitist. I'll own that. There is a reason Bon Iver is awesome (like his music style or not) and most that listen to Contemporary Christian Music will never get that.
I would not argue that Cash didn't sing music with religious roots, but I have always thought that his being reborn had a lot more to do with getting into June's pants than anything else. Not saying he wasn't a Christian, mind you. I love The Messiah, but that's good music regardless of the lyrics (which are nothing special).
laconicsax
(14,860 posts)Not only did I think the music sucked, but a majority of the regular musicians I worked with thought it sucked too.
but I cant get into the bands he says theyre trying to imitate either. Im pretty much stuck in the past.
Anyway, an excuse to post a great classic christian song
There's a narrow definition of contemporary Christion music floating around.
cbayer
(146,218 posts)On a recent cross country road trip, I frequently tuned into local channels (because I like the farm reports and swap segments). Often, I would listen to the music for awhile before I even realized it was contemporary christian.
immoderate
(20,885 posts)And few Christian musicians are break away artists. They lag behind and copy marginal artists, themselves mostly imitative.
They are not Ray Charles, Clyde McPhatter, or Aretha Franklin.
--imm
dmallind
(10,437 posts)At least what shows up in Amazon and the torrent sites with that label that I've heard.
I'm sure there's plenty of music by Christian artists that is fine, even plenty with Christian themes too. But by and large everything I have heard specifically intended, marketed and categorized as Christian music lately is insipid claptrap. I can't pretend I've made much of a study though. Other than bored Rhapsody scrolling and bar muzak I don't listen to much modern music at all let alone Xian ariants. When it comes to music I'm a 70's fan. The 1870's of course.
Those who think there is good contemporary Xian music out there should probably post some names - I get the feeling this is not a widely understood discrete genre.
ButterflyBlood
(12,644 posts)It has a lot of post-rock influence and mid-90s style emotive hardcore dynamic stuff going on:
Here's another song I like, though the worship band at my church plays it better. They did last Sunday and they not only had people cheering before they were done but lots of people jumping around and doing a quasi-mosh sort of thing:
Dawson Leery
(19,348 posts)Frightening!
rug
(82,333 posts)Dawson Leery
(19,348 posts)rug
(82,333 posts)That's only 200 miles from me.
Thanks for the warning!
Dawson Leery
(19,348 posts)Always be on the lookout.
OriginalGeek
(12,132 posts)this was 20+ years ago, mind you...he knew I was into metal and he had been in his previous unsaved state too. He was ALWAYS, like every day, bringing me tapes of TERRIBLE christian bands because they "sound just like Judas Priest" or Iron Maiden...he said he had a christian equivalent for any metal band I liked. I asked him why I would want a copy of a band when I could just listen to the actual band? Especially when the bands he brought me were laughably bad at best.
The reason I don't like "Christian Metal" is because I don't believe it is sincere. Every single note of it is manufactured (by persons of questionable talent and inspiration) to be marketed to sell Jesus to people who want to have their rock music and feel pure too.
Of course, there was my bible teacher in christian High School who said "Christian rock is just as satanic as secular rock. It's not Christian to wrap God's word up in satanic music and say it's OK. Besides, they suck. If you are gonna sin and listen to rock music, you might as well at least listen to the good stuff like Led Zeppelin and Toto."
That last sentence is one of the few things he ever said that I kind of agreed with....not sure about Toto (a couple good songs) but I love me some Zeppelin.
So yeah, I am naturally opposed to anything marketed as "christian music" in the way that means it is a christian alternative to popular rock sounds. I have tons of music, however, that I love by bands consisting of people who are christians.
Hell, half of Slayer are believing catholics.
kwassa
(23,340 posts)As memorable as new age music.
ButterflyBlood
(12,644 posts)The church I go to manages to avoid this by playing music that sounds more like the indie rock and post-hardcore stuff most of the worship band musicians listen to (I see some of them at clubs and shows around here sometimes, so I know they like good music) instead of that sappy awful pop you hear on Christian radio. I'll admit to liking a few Hillsong and Jesus Culture songs (and they play some of their songs too, the good ones), but I can't imagine listening to an entire album by them, most of it barely tolerable.
This however is one of my favorite bands of all time and I know many atheists cite them as the "exception" to that all Christian music is bad:
And I'll just say that as generic and boring as this band usually is, this song is A LOT of fun to mosh to:
raccoon
(31,111 posts)MineralMan
(146,317 posts)I'm not a fan of hip-hop, either. Give me that old-time Christian music:
I'm old-fashioned that way.
darkstar3
(8,763 posts)Lydia Leftcoast
(48,217 posts)Here's one by contemporary British composer Judith Weir
This one is by contemporary American composer Eric Whitacre
This one is by contemporary American composer Morten Lauridsen
This one is by recently deceased British composer John Gardner
and here's one that my choir performed in concert. It's composed to have choral and instrumental parts interspersed with field recordings of African village music. Yes, the choir parts are tricky. This is from another recently deceased British composer, David Fanshawe.
John Tavener is an eccentric but still living British composer. This is his setting of William Blake's poem "The Lamb"
"Brazilian Psalm" is by German-American composer Jean Berger, who died about ten years ago. This is the final part of a much longer and more complicated work, which we sang.
So there's quite a lot of contemporary Christian music that isn't either sugary pop music or rock.
rug
(82,333 posts)cbayer
(146,218 posts)Lydia Leftcoast
(48,217 posts)cbayer
(146,218 posts)PM me if you don't want to post it, but I may want to visit it if it is in the LA region.
laconicsax
(14,860 posts)-None of it is pop music, giving it an automatic advantage.
-It's written by serious composers.
-It's generally sacred concert music, rather than religious pop music.
Lydia Leftcoast
(48,217 posts)they're actually anthem music, sung by the choir during the Sunday morning service (in addition to psalms and service music).
ButterflyBlood
(12,644 posts)I'm now of the mindset if people aren't doing that it's not church.
ZombieHorde
(29,047 posts)Swans...
TOOL is a really good New Age rock band... (in my opinion)
darkstar3
(8,763 posts)Enya is new-age.
Now if you're referring to their views, I still don't think they qualify as new-age. But that's the beautiful thing about TOOL. As Keenan said:
ZombieHorde
(29,047 posts)religious syncretism. Every religious thing from them I have heard or seen seems like New Age religion to me. The symbols at their concerts, the liner notes of one of their albums, the ritual blessing of the lead singer's wine orchard in his wine documentary Blood Into Wine, and the crazy shit they post on their web site: http://www.toolband.com/index_frames.html
This is from today (May 3rd, 2012)
When not meddling with the Goetia or other 'black books', entheogens were employed as visionary tools (often combined with ceremonial mechanics) to facilitate daring sojourns to the outposts of 'reality' and, hopefully, vivid encounters with the denizens that populated this hyper-spatial topography. These entities might include the various tryptoids, tikes, and mantids described by the psychedelic theorist Terence McKenna and other intrepid (or foolish) neuronants. And, indeed, at times, there were fleeting glimpses of those that existbehind the scenery: haunting tryptamine jesters with outrageously complex appliances, electric flesh guides, silver fire babies and vortices of jeweled phantoms. Did I mention the cartoonish squatamauders? Eventually, attempts were made to shatter certain biological safeguards via simulated death techniques in order to access the endogenous tryptamine dimensions, with the operations carefully timed to coincide with the plummeting brightness of the eclipsing trinary star Algol (Beta Persei). (Disclaimer: Don't try this at home, kids. Professional psychonants. Mindscapes closed. Otherwise, you just might end up as a Christian fundamentalist or, even worse, composing esoteric verses that billions of apathetic souls will never recite.)
opiate69
(10,129 posts)one of Maynard Keenan's heroes and best friends was none other than Bill Hicks, and Tool is absolutely renowned for "fucking" with (for want of a better phrase) their audience with stuff like that. Lachrymology anyone?
cleanhippie
(19,705 posts)nonsensical musings. Interesting, but meaningful to the reader only in what meaning they choose to give it.
Tool, IMO, are a clan of musical geniuses. And as history has shown, true geniuses are subject to nonsensical ramblings.
darkstar3
(8,763 posts)What I think about it though is different from your view. From what I've read of Maynard and crew, and what I've heard from all their side projects, it strikes me that TOOL employs a lot of religious syncretism for poetry and subversion.
But then it all comes down to that quote from Keenan above.
cleanhippie
(19,705 posts)I think that is an excellent summary.
AlbertCat
(17,505 posts)...in any period you care to name.
Most classical music sucked when it was contemporary. Mozart, Haydn and Beethoven were only 3 composers out of how many?
Most Baroque music sucked when it was contemporary. Bach, Handel and Vivaldi.... well you get the picture...
and so forth.
This does not mean there is zero good music or even GREAT music at any given time. But when all the written music of a period is taken into account, most of it is forgotten as time moves on. Time weeds out the trendy stuff and the stuff that simply doesn't speak to people as time goes by.
So.... things are just as they should be.
Lydia Leftcoast
(48,217 posts)Palestrina, Victoria, Tallis, Dowland, Gibbons, Lully, Charpentier, Couperin, Josquin de Prez... There were more than three good composers then.
If you expand the list to the 19th and 20th centuries, the list grows to the hundreds.
Your ears need to get out more.
cynatnite
(31,011 posts)I like it. I'm an atheist and I like to sing along with it when I hear it on the radio.
jeepnstein
(2,631 posts)If you're talking about most of the genre commonly referred to as "Christian Contemporary Music" (CCM). There's some truly dreadful music out there, as is always the case with any form of popular music. Very little of it will have any staying power at all. It's popular because it's simple, easy to sing, and not terribly challenging theologically speaking. I play it every week in Church and it drives me insane at times.
Johnny Cash? He was the living example of a very imperfect man who struggled his whole life with God. In the end, I think he got it right. The stuff he recorded after June died is stunning. These two are on my iPod right now.
Lydia Leftcoast
(48,217 posts)He didn't last long after June died, did he?
ButterflyBlood
(12,644 posts)The original is by Nine Inch Nails.
It's kind of ironic it's often interpreted as having a religious sort of message when the album that contains the original version also contains this song:
jeepnstein
(2,631 posts)That's for sure. I think it's interesting both ways. I've been a huge NIN fan since the first time I heard them many years ago. Trent Reznor sure loves to take you places some times you'd rather not be.
Just goes to show that two artists doing the same material from their own point of view can really change the outcome.
cleanhippie
(19,705 posts)Top 5 at least.
He took that song and made it his. Its awesome.
independentpiney
(1,510 posts)Joseph8th
(228 posts)... but eerily a few times in rural areas I've been happy to find a rock station on the FM dial, even if it sounds like bad College Rock, only to realize... it's Christian Rock!! NOOOO!!!! I was TAPPING MY FOOT to THAT?! Heheh.
But seriously -- I'm a lifetime lover of gospel music... y'know from early Sam Cooke to the Dixie Hummingbirds, Aretha Franklin... and an unabashed atheist. I love the music, and love Ray Charles gospel sound most of all -- he freed the music from the chains of the godbelievers. (Sam Cooke of course was famously booted from Gospel music association by Franklin et al. for doing the same thing.)
It's that sound. That sound. It's the same thing with the Blues -- I love it, but the lyrics are ... er... "misogynistic" is too nice. Just because I dig Robert Johnson's sound doesn't mean I support Satanism. Heheh.
Jim__
(14,077 posts)OK a very long essay from February 2004 in GQ, Upon This Rock, by John Jeremiah Sullivan. I included the part about the music in the extract. The rest of the essay - the part I've read - is about the festival. I don't have any opinion about Christian rock because I've never listened to it.
The excerpt
Ritter waved his arm like an impresario. He said, "This, my friend, is Creation."
For their encore, Jars of Clay did a cover of U2's "All I Want Is You." It was bluesy.
That's the last thing I'll be saying about the bands.
Or, no, wait, there's this: The fact that I didn't think I heard a single interesting bar of music from the forty or so acts I caught or overheard at Creation shouldn't be read as a knock on the acts themselves, much less as contempt for the underlying notion of Christians playing rock. These were not Christian bands, you see; these were Christian-rock bands. The key to digging this scene lies in that one-syllable distinction. Christian rock is a genre that exists to edify and make money off of evangelical Christians. It's message music for listeners who know the message cold, and, what's more, it operates under a perceived responsibilityone the artists embraceto "reach people." As such, it rewards both obviousness and maximum palatability (the artists would say clarity), which in turn means parasitism. Remember those perfume dispensers they used to have in pharmacies"If you like Drakkar Noir, you'll love Sexy Musk"? Well, Christian rock works like that. Every successful crappy secular group has its Christian off-brand, and that's proper, because culturally speaking, it's supposed to serve as a stand-in for, not an alternative to or an improvement on, those very groups. In this it succeeds wonderfully. If you think it profoundly sucks, that's because your priorities are not its priorities; you want to hear something cool and new, it needs to play something proven to please while praising Jesus Christ. That's Christian rock. A Christian band, on the other hand, is just a band that has more than one Christian in it. U2 is the exemplar, held aloft by believers and nonbelievers alike, but there have been others through the years, bands about which people would say, "Did you know those guys were Christians? I knowit's freaky. They're still fuckin' good, though." The Call was like that; Lone Justice was like that. These days you hear it about indie acts like Pedro the Lion and Damien Jurado (or P.O.D. and Evanescencede gustibus). In most cases, bands like these make a very, very careful effort not to be seen as playing "Christian rock." It's largely a matter of phrasing: Don't tell the interviewer you're born-again; say faith is a very important part of your life. And here, if I can drop the open-minded pretense real quick, is where the stickier problem of actually being any good comes in, because a question that must be asked is whether a hard-core Christian who turns 19 and finds he or she can write first-rate songs (someone like Damien Jurado) would ever have anything whatsoever to do with Christian rock. Talent tends to come hand in hand with a certain base level of subtlety. And believe it or not, the Christian-rock establishment sometimes expresses a kind of resigned approval of the way groups like U2 or Switchfoot (who played Creation while I was there and had a monster secular--radio hit at the time with "Meant to Live" but whose management wouldn't allow them to be photographed onstage) take quiet pains to distance themselves from any unambiguous Jesus-loving, recognizing that this is the surest way to connect with the world (you know that's how they refer to us, right? We're "of the world" . So it's possibleand indeed seems likelythat Christian rock is a musical genre, the only one I can think of, that has excellence-proofed itself.
...
cynatnite
(31,011 posts)I do like some of their music.