Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

rug

(82,333 posts)
Tue May 1, 2012, 02:52 PM May 2012

Does Contemporary Christian Music Suck?

by Don Lacey on May. 01, 2012

Here’s the latest opinion from Jim Wilson:

Does Contemporary Christian Music Suck?

“Can’t you see you’re not making Christianity any better, you’re just making rock ‘n roll worse?”

-Hank Hill

Does Christian music suck? That may depend how one defines Christian Music. For example, I do not believe Johnny Cash’s music sucks. Despite being an Atheist, I enjoy the vast majority of it, very much, and yet, Johnny Cash was a Christian and much of his music dealt with explicitly Christian topics. This is true of many American artists, whose music often deals with explicitly Christian matters, but is still enjoyable. Spiritual music is an important part of our American musical heritage and many artists have been able to draw upon heritage to great effect.

http://tucsoncitizen.com/freethought-arizona/2012/05/01/does-contemporary-christian-music-suck/

57 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Does Contemporary Christian Music Suck? (Original Post) rug May 2012 OP
Yes. Goblinmonger May 2012 #1
Have you not heard some of Johnny's gospel songs and old hymns? Common Sense Party May 2012 #7
I have an 8-CD set of Johnny Cash. Goblinmonger May 2012 #8
I'm not redefining anything. Christian music has existed for a long time and is not Common Sense Party May 2012 #11
OP subject is about the current stuff. I answered that question. Goblinmonger May 2012 #17
I responded only to your statement: "to say that Johnny Cash is Christian music is just...wrong" Common Sense Party May 2012 #20
It's late, so I'm marking this post so I can come back deucemagnet May 2012 #23
I know how many songs were about sins. And I know how many were about redemption. Common Sense Party May 2012 #24
He may have been christian Dorian Gray May 2012 #25
Fine. You contact the Christian radio stations. deucemagnet May 2012 #27
But I think that is exactly the point that the author is making. BlueState May 2012 #12
I'm not arguing that it sucks because it is Christian. Goblinmonger May 2012 #18
I've subbed in contemporary Christian groups. laconicsax May 2012 #2
probably Enrique May 2012 #3
Classic. rug May 2012 #5
Some of it is pretty good. cbayer May 2012 #4
If you're old, like me, at least a lot of contemporary music sucks. immoderate May 2012 #6
Mostly yes dmallind May 2012 #9
I like this song a lot ButterflyBlood May 2012 #22
Ever hear "Christian Metal"? Dawson Leery May 2012 #10
You're not going to post that Pat Boone cd are you? rug May 2012 #13
Google: "thousand foot krutch" Dawson Leery May 2012 #14
I just did. According to their website they're playing at Creation Festival East June 29. rug May 2012 #15
Just one of many of those horrid bands out there. Dawson Leery May 2012 #16
I used to work with a recently born again fella OriginalGeek May 2012 #45
The bland leading the bland. Contemporary Christian music. kwassa May 2012 #19
The vast majority of it does yes ButterflyBlood May 2012 #21
Yes! Tunes are lame....lyrics are lame and both are unmemorable. nt raccoon May 2012 #26
I don't like it, but what does that mean? MineralMan May 2012 #28
Out loud. darkstar3 May 2012 #29
Then there's the kind of contemporary Christian music that my choir sings Lydia Leftcoast May 2012 #30
Gorgeous. rug May 2012 #31
That's really cool. Where is your church? cbayer May 2012 #32
I'm at an Episcopal cathedral Lydia Leftcoast May 2012 #33
LA area by any chance? cbayer May 2012 #34
I consider that stuff to be a separate genre laconicsax May 2012 #46
Except for the African Sanctus, Lydia Leftcoast May 2012 #47
Meh, that doesn't make me want to sway or raise my hands. ;) ButterflyBlood May 2012 #49
One of my favorite rock bands is Christian. ZombieHorde May 2012 #35
Quibble: TOOL is not new-age darkstar3 May 2012 #38
I think you are referring to the musical genre "new age," while I am referring to their ZombieHorde May 2012 #40
Keep in mind though, opiate69 May 2012 #41
Indeed, this months newsletters' ramblings are just that... cleanhippie May 2012 #56
I don't necessarily disagree with you about the content of their...content. ;) darkstar3 May 2012 #42
"...it strikes me that TOOL employs a lot of religious syncretism for poetry and subversion." cleanhippie May 2012 #57
Most contemporary MUSIC sux AlbertCat May 2012 #36
In the Renaissance and Baroque: Handel, Purcell, Scarlatti, Telemann, Schütz, Lydia Leftcoast May 2012 #39
The only christian song I know by MercyMe is okay... cynatnite May 2012 #37
It sure does. jeepnstein May 2012 #43
Wow, "hurt" is right Lydia Leftcoast May 2012 #48
That song is actually a cover ButterflyBlood May 2012 #50
Reznor approaches it differently. jeepnstein May 2012 #54
I am of the opinion that Cash's cover of "Hurt" is one of the best covers ever done. cleanhippie May 2012 #55
Suck is being kind nt independentpiney May 2012 #44
I get what the Hank Hill quote is saying... Joseph8th May 2012 #51
Here's a long essay (somewhat) on Christian rock. Jim__ May 2012 #52
Isn't Creed considered a Christian rock band? cynatnite May 2012 #53

Common Sense Party

(14,139 posts)
7. Have you not heard some of Johnny's gospel songs and old hymns?
Tue May 1, 2012, 03:48 PM
May 2012

Johnny was a serious Christian. I love his faith-based songs.

 

Goblinmonger

(22,340 posts)
8. I have an 8-CD set of Johnny Cash.
Tue May 1, 2012, 03:55 PM
May 2012

If we want to redefine what "Christian Music" means in pop culture, then fine. But as it is used, Christian artists now are mostly musical hacks that can't make it in the music scene.

Common Sense Party

(14,139 posts)
11. I'm not redefining anything. Christian music has existed for a long time and is not
Tue May 1, 2012, 05:41 PM
May 2012

defined by nor limited to the current slew of talent-deprived marketing strategies that are passing for "artists" today.

Common Sense Party

(14,139 posts)
20. I responded only to your statement: "to say that Johnny Cash is Christian music is just...wrong"
Tue May 1, 2012, 11:19 PM
May 2012

You mentioned nothing about "contemporary" in that statement.

Johnny Cash definitely recorded some wonderful Christian music. That is the full extent of my point and our disagreement.

deucemagnet

(4,549 posts)
23. It's late, so I'm marking this post so I can come back
Wed May 2, 2012, 02:35 AM
May 2012

and show just how many Johnny Cash songs were about murder, theft, spending time in prison, and infidelity. Specifically, the infidelity between the then-married Cash and the then-married June Carter. But hey, let's put all of that in the Christian blind spot and call Johny's music "Christian". Hell, Christians should be so lucky. If Johnny Cash's music were truly Christian, the genre would be much more popular.

Common Sense Party

(14,139 posts)
24. I know how many songs were about sins. And I know how many were about redemption.
Wed May 2, 2012, 03:02 AM
May 2012

It's idiotic to say that the ones about redemption are somehow not Christian songs when they clearly were.

Dorian Gray

(13,496 posts)
25. He may have been christian
Wed May 2, 2012, 07:29 AM
May 2012

and his music may have been inspired by religion, but you will not find his music in the Christian music section of any record store. No way.

Christian music sucks.

deucemagnet

(4,549 posts)
27. Fine. You contact the Christian radio stations.
Wed May 2, 2012, 11:44 AM
May 2012

Last edited Fri May 4, 2012, 03:59 AM - Edit history (1)

I'll just sit here and bask in the image of Christian love that he projects, idiotically.





I don't know why this image didn't sow in my original post, but here it is.

BlueState

(642 posts)
12. But I think that is exactly the point that the author is making.
Tue May 1, 2012, 05:45 PM
May 2012

Johnny Cash created great music, much of it inspired by his Christian faith. Thus it is Christian music that
does not suck.

However, there is a genre of modern popular music know as "Christian Contemporary" which by-and-large
sucks.

Thus the point "CCM" doesn't suck because it is Christian but because it is mass produced garbage.

 

Goblinmonger

(22,340 posts)
18. I'm not arguing that it sucks because it is Christian.
Tue May 1, 2012, 09:27 PM
May 2012

It sucks because of the same reason that the winner of American Idol is never the best singer of the bunch. It's because the audience it is aimed at are musical buffoons that wouldn't know good music if it bit them in the ass. Yes, go ahead and call me a musical elitist. I'll own that. There is a reason Bon Iver is awesome (like his music style or not) and most that listen to Contemporary Christian Music will never get that.

I would not argue that Cash didn't sing music with religious roots, but I have always thought that his being reborn had a lot more to do with getting into June's pants than anything else. Not saying he wasn't a Christian, mind you. I love The Messiah, but that's good music regardless of the lyrics (which are nothing special).

 

laconicsax

(14,860 posts)
2. I've subbed in contemporary Christian groups.
Tue May 1, 2012, 02:59 PM
May 2012

Not only did I think the music sucked, but a majority of the regular musicians I worked with thought it sucked too.

Enrique

(27,461 posts)
3. probably
Tue May 1, 2012, 03:01 PM
May 2012

but I cant get into the bands he says theyre trying to imitate either. Im pretty much stuck in the past.

Anyway, an excuse to post a great classic christian song

cbayer

(146,218 posts)
4. Some of it is pretty good.
Tue May 1, 2012, 03:08 PM
May 2012

On a recent cross country road trip, I frequently tuned into local channels (because I like the farm reports and swap segments). Often, I would listen to the music for awhile before I even realized it was contemporary christian.

 

immoderate

(20,885 posts)
6. If you're old, like me, at least a lot of contemporary music sucks.
Tue May 1, 2012, 03:14 PM
May 2012

And few Christian musicians are break away artists. They lag behind and copy marginal artists, themselves mostly imitative.

They are not Ray Charles, Clyde McPhatter, or Aretha Franklin.


--imm

dmallind

(10,437 posts)
9. Mostly yes
Tue May 1, 2012, 04:21 PM
May 2012

At least what shows up in Amazon and the torrent sites with that label that I've heard.

I'm sure there's plenty of music by Christian artists that is fine, even plenty with Christian themes too. But by and large everything I have heard specifically intended, marketed and categorized as Christian music lately is insipid claptrap. I can't pretend I've made much of a study though. Other than bored Rhapsody scrolling and bar muzak I don't listen to much modern music at all let alone Xian ariants. When it comes to music I'm a 70's fan. The 1870's of course.

Those who think there is good contemporary Xian music out there should probably post some names - I get the feeling this is not a widely understood discrete genre.

ButterflyBlood

(12,644 posts)
22. I like this song a lot
Wed May 2, 2012, 02:08 AM
May 2012

It has a lot of post-rock influence and mid-90s style emotive hardcore dynamic stuff going on:



Here's another song I like, though the worship band at my church plays it better. They did last Sunday and they not only had people cheering before they were done but lots of people jumping around and doing a quasi-mosh sort of thing:
 

rug

(82,333 posts)
15. I just did. According to their website they're playing at Creation Festival East June 29.
Tue May 1, 2012, 08:20 PM
May 2012

That's only 200 miles from me.

Thanks for the warning!

OriginalGeek

(12,132 posts)
45. I used to work with a recently born again fella
Fri May 4, 2012, 05:30 PM
May 2012

this was 20+ years ago, mind you...he knew I was into metal and he had been in his previous unsaved state too. He was ALWAYS, like every day, bringing me tapes of TERRIBLE christian bands because they "sound just like Judas Priest" or Iron Maiden...he said he had a christian equivalent for any metal band I liked. I asked him why I would want a copy of a band when I could just listen to the actual band? Especially when the bands he brought me were laughably bad at best.

The reason I don't like "Christian Metal" is because I don't believe it is sincere. Every single note of it is manufactured (by persons of questionable talent and inspiration) to be marketed to sell Jesus to people who want to have their rock music and feel pure too.

Of course, there was my bible teacher in christian High School who said "Christian rock is just as satanic as secular rock. It's not Christian to wrap God's word up in satanic music and say it's OK. Besides, they suck. If you are gonna sin and listen to rock music, you might as well at least listen to the good stuff like Led Zeppelin and Toto."

That last sentence is one of the few things he ever said that I kind of agreed with....not sure about Toto (a couple good songs) but I love me some Zeppelin.

So yeah, I am naturally opposed to anything marketed as "christian music" in the way that means it is a christian alternative to popular rock sounds. I have tons of music, however, that I love by bands consisting of people who are christians.

Hell, half of Slayer are believing catholics.


ButterflyBlood

(12,644 posts)
21. The vast majority of it does yes
Wed May 2, 2012, 01:57 AM
May 2012

The church I go to manages to avoid this by playing music that sounds more like the indie rock and post-hardcore stuff most of the worship band musicians listen to (I see some of them at clubs and shows around here sometimes, so I know they like good music) instead of that sappy awful pop you hear on Christian radio. I'll admit to liking a few Hillsong and Jesus Culture songs (and they play some of their songs too, the good ones), but I can't imagine listening to an entire album by them, most of it barely tolerable.

This however is one of my favorite bands of all time and I know many atheists cite them as the "exception" to that all Christian music is bad:



And I'll just say that as generic and boring as this band usually is, this song is A LOT of fun to mosh to:

MineralMan

(146,317 posts)
28. I don't like it, but what does that mean?
Wed May 2, 2012, 08:08 PM
May 2012

I'm not a fan of hip-hop, either. Give me that old-time Christian music:



I'm old-fashioned that way.

Lydia Leftcoast

(48,217 posts)
30. Then there's the kind of contemporary Christian music that my choir sings
Thu May 3, 2012, 04:32 AM
May 2012

Here's one by contemporary British composer Judith Weir



This one is by contemporary American composer Eric Whitacre



This one is by contemporary American composer Morten Lauridsen


This one is by recently deceased British composer John Gardner



and here's one that my choir performed in concert. It's composed to have choral and instrumental parts interspersed with field recordings of African village music. Yes, the choir parts are tricky. This is from another recently deceased British composer, David Fanshawe.



John Tavener is an eccentric but still living British composer. This is his setting of William Blake's poem "The Lamb"



"Brazilian Psalm" is by German-American composer Jean Berger, who died about ten years ago. This is the final part of a much longer and more complicated work, which we sang.



So there's quite a lot of contemporary Christian music that isn't either sugary pop music or rock.

cbayer

(146,218 posts)
34. LA area by any chance?
Thu May 3, 2012, 05:40 PM
May 2012

PM me if you don't want to post it, but I may want to visit it if it is in the LA region.

 

laconicsax

(14,860 posts)
46. I consider that stuff to be a separate genre
Fri May 4, 2012, 07:54 PM
May 2012

-None of it is pop music, giving it an automatic advantage.
-It's written by serious composers.
-It's generally sacred concert music, rather than religious pop music.

Lydia Leftcoast

(48,217 posts)
47. Except for the African Sanctus,
Fri May 4, 2012, 08:34 PM
May 2012

they're actually anthem music, sung by the choir during the Sunday morning service (in addition to psalms and service music).

ButterflyBlood

(12,644 posts)
49. Meh, that doesn't make me want to sway or raise my hands. ;)
Sat May 5, 2012, 01:02 AM
May 2012

I'm now of the mindset if people aren't doing that it's not church.

ZombieHorde

(29,047 posts)
35. One of my favorite rock bands is Christian.
Thu May 3, 2012, 07:59 PM
May 2012

Swans...



TOOL is a really good New Age rock band... (in my opinion)

darkstar3

(8,763 posts)
38. Quibble: TOOL is not new-age
Thu May 3, 2012, 11:18 PM
May 2012

Enya is new-age.

Now if you're referring to their views, I still don't think they qualify as new-age. But that's the beautiful thing about TOOL. As Keenan said:

"Tool is exactly what it sounds like: It's a big dick. It's a wrench.... we are... your tool; use us as a catalyst in your process of finding out whatever it is you need to find out, or whatever it is you're trying to achieve."

ZombieHorde

(29,047 posts)
40. I think you are referring to the musical genre "new age," while I am referring to their
Fri May 4, 2012, 12:30 AM
May 2012

religious syncretism. Every religious thing from them I have heard or seen seems like New Age religion to me. The symbols at their concerts, the liner notes of one of their albums, the ritual blessing of the lead singer's wine orchard in his wine documentary Blood Into Wine, and the crazy shit they post on their web site: http://www.toolband.com/index_frames.html

This is from today (May 3rd, 2012)

Given the amount of unused space, and knowing that there was earth right beneath the hard surface, it wasn't long before a certain small group of practicing ceremonial magicians moved their Lodge headquarters from another loft (this one above Frederick's of Hollywood) to Danny's new place. On certain nights, while seated within the Circle of Protection and Obedience, the practitioners carefully followed the strange requirements of various medieval grimoires. Anticipating changes in the neural-matrix during the Praxis, some were still a bit apprehensive of astral turbulence and unwanted tangential phenomena. If followed to the letter (meaning no haphazard substitutions or other liberties taken), the Barbarous Words of Evocation might result in a bountiful harvest provided by certain spirits brought to physical manifestation from the relativistic space-time continuum. To produce the desired result while manipulating hidden forces (i.e. intelligences) listed in the old grammars of magic, once rare ingredients were procured from a nearby occult marketplace, one merely had to understand exactly what are (and more importantly) what AREN'T traps for fools. "Coincidently', abandoned in the 'Frederick's' loft was a large circular wooden board that had been painted with sigils from the "Heptameron" (as appended to Agrippa's "Fourth Book of Occult Philosophy&quot which the current occupier had found amongst some junk left by the previous tenants. It seemed that someone (or something) was looking out for us! (Note: This still exists on the reverse side of Danny's Enochian "Sigillum Die Ameth" board - a talismanic stage backdrop that should be familiar to most Tool enthusiasts.)

When not meddling with the Goetia or other 'black books', entheogens were employed as visionary tools (often combined with ceremonial mechanics) to facilitate daring sojourns to the outposts of 'reality' and, hopefully, vivid encounters with the denizens that populated this hyper-spatial topography. These entities might include the various tryptoids, tikes, and mantids described by the psychedelic theorist Terence McKenna and other intrepid (or foolish) neuronants. And, indeed, at times, there were fleeting glimpses of those that existbehind the scenery: haunting tryptamine jesters with outrageously complex appliances, electric flesh guides, silver fire babies and vortices of jeweled phantoms. Did I mention the cartoonish squatamauders? Eventually, attempts were made to shatter certain biological safeguards via simulated death techniques in order to access the endogenous tryptamine dimensions, with the operations carefully timed to coincide with the plummeting brightness of the eclipsing trinary star Algol (Beta Persei). (Disclaimer: Don't try this at home, kids. Professional psychonants. Mindscapes closed. Otherwise, you just might end up as a Christian fundamentalist or, even worse, composing esoteric verses that billions of apathetic souls will never recite.)
 

opiate69

(10,129 posts)
41. Keep in mind though,
Fri May 4, 2012, 12:46 AM
May 2012

one of Maynard Keenan's heroes and best friends was none other than Bill Hicks, and Tool is absolutely renowned for "fucking" with (for want of a better phrase) their audience with stuff like that. Lachrymology anyone?

cleanhippie

(19,705 posts)
56. Indeed, this months newsletters' ramblings are just that...
Sun May 6, 2012, 10:44 AM
May 2012

nonsensical musings. Interesting, but meaningful to the reader only in what meaning they choose to give it.

Tool, IMO, are a clan of musical geniuses. And as history has shown, true geniuses are subject to nonsensical ramblings.


darkstar3

(8,763 posts)
42. I don't necessarily disagree with you about the content of their...content. ;)
Fri May 4, 2012, 12:46 AM
May 2012

What I think about it though is different from your view. From what I've read of Maynard and crew, and what I've heard from all their side projects, it strikes me that TOOL employs a lot of religious syncretism for poetry and subversion.

But then it all comes down to that quote from Keenan above.

cleanhippie

(19,705 posts)
57. "...it strikes me that TOOL employs a lot of religious syncretism for poetry and subversion."
Sun May 6, 2012, 10:45 AM
May 2012

I think that is an excellent summary.

 

AlbertCat

(17,505 posts)
36. Most contemporary MUSIC sux
Thu May 3, 2012, 10:59 PM
May 2012

...in any period you care to name.

Most classical music sucked when it was contemporary. Mozart, Haydn and Beethoven were only 3 composers out of how many?

Most Baroque music sucked when it was contemporary. Bach, Handel and Vivaldi.... well you get the picture...

and so forth.

This does not mean there is zero good music or even GREAT music at any given time. But when all the written music of a period is taken into account, most of it is forgotten as time moves on. Time weeds out the trendy stuff and the stuff that simply doesn't speak to people as time goes by.

So.... things are just as they should be.

Lydia Leftcoast

(48,217 posts)
39. In the Renaissance and Baroque: Handel, Purcell, Scarlatti, Telemann, Schütz,
Fri May 4, 2012, 12:11 AM
May 2012

Palestrina, Victoria, Tallis, Dowland, Gibbons, Lully, Charpentier, Couperin, Josquin de Prez... There were more than three good composers then.

If you expand the list to the 19th and 20th centuries, the list grows to the hundreds.

Your ears need to get out more.

cynatnite

(31,011 posts)
37. The only christian song I know by MercyMe is okay...
Thu May 3, 2012, 11:12 PM
May 2012

I like it. I'm an atheist and I like to sing along with it when I hear it on the radio.

jeepnstein

(2,631 posts)
43. It sure does.
Fri May 4, 2012, 11:07 AM
May 2012

If you're talking about most of the genre commonly referred to as "Christian Contemporary Music" (CCM). There's some truly dreadful music out there, as is always the case with any form of popular music. Very little of it will have any staying power at all. It's popular because it's simple, easy to sing, and not terribly challenging theologically speaking. I play it every week in Church and it drives me insane at times.

Johnny Cash? He was the living example of a very imperfect man who struggled his whole life with God. In the end, I think he got it right. The stuff he recorded after June died is stunning. These two are on my iPod right now.



ButterflyBlood

(12,644 posts)
50. That song is actually a cover
Sat May 5, 2012, 01:03 AM
May 2012

The original is by Nine Inch Nails.

It's kind of ironic it's often interpreted as having a religious sort of message when the album that contains the original version also contains this song:

jeepnstein

(2,631 posts)
54. Reznor approaches it differently.
Sat May 5, 2012, 07:47 PM
May 2012

That's for sure. I think it's interesting both ways. I've been a huge NIN fan since the first time I heard them many years ago. Trent Reznor sure loves to take you places some times you'd rather not be.

Just goes to show that two artists doing the same material from their own point of view can really change the outcome.

cleanhippie

(19,705 posts)
55. I am of the opinion that Cash's cover of "Hurt" is one of the best covers ever done.
Sun May 6, 2012, 10:39 AM
May 2012

Top 5 at least.

He took that song and made it his. Its awesome.

 

Joseph8th

(228 posts)
51. I get what the Hank Hill quote is saying...
Sat May 5, 2012, 03:04 AM
May 2012

... but eerily a few times in rural areas I've been happy to find a rock station on the FM dial, even if it sounds like bad College Rock, only to realize... it's Christian Rock!! NOOOO!!!! I was TAPPING MY FOOT to THAT?! Heheh.

But seriously -- I'm a lifetime lover of gospel music... y'know from early Sam Cooke to the Dixie Hummingbirds, Aretha Franklin... and an unabashed atheist. I love the music, and love Ray Charles gospel sound most of all -- he freed the music from the chains of the godbelievers. (Sam Cooke of course was famously booted from Gospel music association by Franklin et al. for doing the same thing.)

It's that sound. That sound. It's the same thing with the Blues -- I love it, but the lyrics are ... er... "misogynistic" is too nice. Just because I dig Robert Johnson's sound doesn't mean I support Satanism. Heheh.

Jim__

(14,077 posts)
52. Here's a long essay (somewhat) on Christian rock.
Sat May 5, 2012, 08:59 AM
May 2012

OK a very long essay from February 2004 in GQ, Upon This Rock, by John Jeremiah Sullivan. I included the part about the music in the extract. The rest of the essay - the part I've read - is about the festival. I don't have any opinion about Christian rock because I've never listened to it.

The excerpt

...

Ritter waved his arm like an impresario. He said, "This, my friend, is Creation."

†††††

For their encore, Jars of Clay did a cover of U2's "All I Want Is You." It was bluesy.

That's the last thing I'll be saying about the bands.

Or, no, wait, there's this: The fact that I didn't think I heard a single interesting bar of music from the forty or so acts I caught or overheard at Creation shouldn't be read as a knock on the acts themselves, much less as contempt for the underlying notion of Christians playing rock. These were not Christian bands, you see; these were Christian-rock bands. The key to digging this scene lies in that one-syllable distinction. Christian rock is a genre that exists to edify and make money off of evangelical Christians. It's message music for listeners who know the message cold, and, what's more, it operates under a perceived responsibility—one the artists embrace—to "reach people." As such, it rewards both obviousness and maximum palatability (the artists would say clarity), which in turn means parasitism. Remember those perfume dispensers they used to have in pharmacies—"If you like Drakkar Noir, you'll love Sexy Musk"? Well, Christian rock works like that. Every successful crappy secular group has its Christian off-brand, and that's proper, because culturally speaking, it's supposed to serve as a stand-in for, not an alternative to or an improvement on, those very groups. In this it succeeds wonderfully. If you think it profoundly sucks, that's because your priorities are not its priorities; you want to hear something cool and new, it needs to play something proven to please…while praising Jesus Christ. That's Christian rock. A Christian band, on the other hand, is just a band that has more than one Christian in it. U2 is the exemplar, held aloft by believers and nonbelievers alike, but there have been others through the years, bands about which people would say, "Did you know those guys were Christians? I know—it's freaky. They're still fuckin' good, though." The Call was like that; Lone Justice was like that. These days you hear it about indie acts like Pedro the Lion and Damien Jurado (or P.O.D. and Evanescence—de gustibus). In most cases, bands like these make a very, very careful effort not to be seen as playing "Christian rock." It's largely a matter of phrasing: Don't tell the interviewer you're born-again; say faith is a very important part of your life. And here, if I can drop the open-minded pretense real quick, is where the stickier problem of actually being any good comes in, because a question that must be asked is whether a hard-core Christian who turns 19 and finds he or she can write first-rate songs (someone like Damien Jurado) would ever have anything whatsoever to do with Christian rock. Talent tends to come hand in hand with a certain base level of subtlety. And believe it or not, the Christian-rock establishment sometimes expresses a kind of resigned approval of the way groups like U2 or Switchfoot (who played Creation while I was there and had a monster secular--radio hit at the time with "Meant to Live" but whose management wouldn't allow them to be photographed onstage) take quiet pains to distance themselves from any unambiguous Jesus-loving, recognizing that this is the surest way to connect with the world (you know that's how they refer to us, right? We're "of the world&quot . So it's possible—and indeed seems likely—that Christian rock is a musical genre, the only one I can think of, that has excellence-proofed itself.


...



Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»Does Contemporary Christi...