Religion
Related: About this forumAnti-progressive people of faith: Part 1
[font size=+2]Paul Ryan[/font]http://www.ncregister.com/daily-news/paul-ryan-on-the-way-forward-and-the-catholic-faith
People may disagree with his ideas, Ryan said, but Pope Francis has not asked for conformity, but participation in an urgent debate regarding solutions that will help the poor.
...
"As a lay Catholic exercising my prudential judgment, I believe that free markets not crony capitalism encourage more personal collaboration than any other economic system. Free enterprise is not coercive, and it does also more to help the poor and lift up people."
...
"We need to promote an inclusive society where everyone takes responsibility. We need to reintegrate the poor and not marginalize them. I am excited that Pope Francis is talking about this."
Certainly not a person we'd admire here on DU, but a person of deep faith nonetheless.
lunasun
(21,646 posts)trotsky
(49,533 posts)That's the unfortunate thing about religion - you can't really tell someone else they're doing it wrong when the "holy" text is so ridiculously open to interpretation.
AJT
(5,240 posts)have done anything but leave vast numbers of people in poverty? Where is the "greed is good" passage of the bible? How does a man of faith propose policies that leave tens of millions of hard working people not able to feed there families, get medical care and pay for a decent place to live? Who can make even $10 an hour and support themselves much less a child, and he would like to eliminate the minimum wage. His deep faith is in a selfish hateful god.
trotsky
(49,533 posts)The secular progressive democracies of Europe with their social safety nets work a lot better at alleviating poverty than the decidedly less restrained system of the USA.
Ryan is just one of the typical naive Republicans who never got to experience unrestrained capitalism to see its horrible failures. So he thinks "regulations" and anti-poverty programs exacerbate poverty. One might say he believes this quite religiously.
AJT
(5,240 posts)everyone the opportunity to succeed to the level of a persons desire and ability, but it doesn't. Not everyone has the brains to "make it big" but everyone should be able to live a decent life if they work a 40 hour week. Not everyone wants to make work their life, but working to live should pay enough to support yourself. A good education for every child, at what ever level they are capable of should be a right. Childcare for working parents should be subsidized. Affordable transportation systems are a necessity. Single payer healthcare is a no brainer. Of course innovation and progress depend on there being an incentive, and the people who are the risk takers and investors should get their due. The government needs to be the buffer or referee between labor and capital and that is no longer the case here, it's all about capital at the expense of labor. Globalization has really thrown a wrench in the works. Capital can move to anywhere in the world at the speed of light, labor is captive. Threats of moving jobs overseas have governments by the you-know-whats and that's where we are now.
trotsky
(49,533 posts)I hope we figure it out sooner rather than later.
guillaumeb
(42,641 posts)I am flattered, and glad to serve as an inspiration.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)guillaumeb
(42,641 posts)inspiration can strike at anytime.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)I have seen the pattern for years.
Some things never change.
Lordquinton
(7,886 posts)but you can't make them look.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Not only is that a logical fallacy, the No True Scotsman, it's obvious he is a man of deep faith. Unless someone actually admits they're not a believer we should take them at their word.
If a Muslim attacks a building in the name of Allah we take his word for it that he's a Muslim.
If a Christian terrorist tries to blow up a women's clinic in the name of his God we take his word for it that he's a Christian.
Why would we think that Ryan is lying about his faith?
Meshuga
(6,182 posts)Paul Ryan is definitely catholic since, according to the church, a person is catholic through the sacraments. If a Catholic priest accepted to marry him and his wife in a church then he is a Catholic. He is also a fucked up person based on his ideology and actions. In short, he is an extremely mean spirited catholic, to put it mildly.
No one can tell whether he is lying about his faith since none of us can read minds, but his faith or lack of faith does not influence whether he is a good person or not.
I believe that the Catholics and other Christians who claim he lies about his faith are merely reacting to the fear that others will make the association between themselves and Paul Ryan. It is silly to react this way even if others make the association.
Or maybe the reaction is due to some other irrational reason that leads them to subscribe to the no true Scotsman fallacy, which is also silly.