Religion
Related: About this forumGood news: Wisconsin priest tells parishioners hes gay, gets ovation
From the article:
To read more:
http://religionnews.com/2017/12/20/wisconsin-priest-tells-parishioners-hes-gay-gets-ovation/
Voltaire2
(13,041 posts)homophobia is alive and well in the RCC.
guillaumeb
(42,641 posts)But we must fight intolerance, and this is a victory in that battle.
Voltaire2
(13,041 posts)In 2001 people in the US opposed gay marriage 57% to 35%. "Based on polling in 2017, a majority of Americans (62%) support same-sex marriage, while 32% oppose it." -PEW
That is a complete turnaround.
So who still opposes it? Glad you asked.
Age is a factor, but by 2017 more than half of the baby boomers supported marriage equality.
Race is a factor, but again by 2017 both white and non-white majorities supported equality.
Uh-oh, yup, religion, party identification, and ideology are the categories where bigotry remains rampant.
Evangelical protestants of any race remain majority opposed to equality. The unaffiliated "nones" are 85% in favor of equality.
Same with self identified Republicans and conservatives.
Binkie The Clown
(7,911 posts)If the priest is celibate why does it matter? Or is gay celibacy different some how from straight celibacy?
It's like asking an honest person if they are a non-bank robber or a non-embezzler. Someone admits he's a non-arsonist, so what? We already knew he was an honest man. What do we care what kind of crime he refrains from?
A priest says he's gay. So what? We already knew he was celibate. Why do we care what kind of sex he refrains from?
guillaumeb
(42,641 posts)and validate it as well in all of its forms. Our sexuality is a huge part of who we are, agreed/
AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)So uh... you post is confusing.
trotsky
(49,533 posts)OP is very confused about what constitutes "good news."
AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)Because you can't opt out of governance of human society.
But religions? You can walk away at any time. They are fully unnecessary. Entirely elective. It is not important, in any sense of the word, that XYZ religion experiences any sort of improvement however large or small, in this regard.
They are unnecessary and internal change within, say, the RCC is of no significance.
It doesn't even matter if they pull their heads out of their asses and let Women serve in the priesthood. Sure, it's an example of diversity and gender equality, but on the other hand, who gives a shit? They've invented an artificial social role with artificial requirements around who can and cannot perform that role, and it matters not in the slightest if they make a change to it.
It is of no material importance to humanity, whatsoever.
Lordquinton
(7,886 posts)There are attempts to diminish the fact that they have homophobia enshrined in their dogma, so it has to be reiterated every time the subject comes up.
Irish_Dem
(47,107 posts)When this priest disclosed his sexual orientation, I think he wanted his parishioners to know he had not broken his vows.
trotsky
(49,533 posts)Of course the last paragraph is the most telling one:
Let us not forget, it's still the official teaching of the RCC that homosexuality is "intrinsically disordered" and that in order to live as a Catholic in good standing, anyone who is attracted to the same sex must deny themselves a full, loving relationship in this life.
Celebrate the priest's announcement, sure, but don't whitewash the reality here.