Religion
Related: About this forumFrom 'Judeo-Christian' to 'Potluck Nation,' Eboo Patel pleads for religious pluralism
From the article:
Now hes written a new book, Out of Many Faiths: Religious Diversity and the American Promise (Sept. 4), the third in a series of books by scholars addressing issues of diversity called Our Compelling Interests.
In it, he offers a passionate defense of American religious diversity as one of the seminal features of U.S. democracy, stretching back to the vision of the Founding Fathers, who he says got it exactly right. He also proposes a new narrative to replace the Judeo-Christian motto with Potluck Nation, which he thinks better describes todays religious diversity.
To read more:
https://religionnews.com/2018/08/30/eboo-patel-wants-to-replace-judeo-christian-with-potluck-nation/
MineralMan
(146,308 posts)What do you take from this, guillaumeb? What do you want us to take from it? You posted it, so you must think it has value. Tell us what you think that value is, please.
I read the interview. I was unable to see anything in it that is in any way different from any other ecumenical, "multi-faith" reasoning. I'd ask the North American First Peoples what they thought of the invasion of their place by Christians. I'd ask, but most of them are long dead and their genetic line is almost gone, thanks to that invasion. How did they benefit?
When religious intolerance is the problem, how does bringing religions together solve the problem? Answer me that.
trotsky
(49,533 posts)I guess we aren't supposed to worry about the details - just respectfully praise religion as the solution to all the problems religion has caused or exacerbated.
MineralMan
(146,308 posts)"exactly right." The "Christian" Right has proven that very well. They are working to make us all their vassals, and doing a pretty damned good job of it. A new Dark Ages is darkly rising. The first one was the work of another religious organization. Now, we face another.
We do not need more religion. We do not need unified religion. We need freedom from religious doctrine, altogether.
Feh!
guillaumeb
(42,641 posts)shows that you are incorrect in your assessment of the US founders.
MineralMan
(146,308 posts)Or perhaps not a pity.
Major Nikon
(36,827 posts)They created a secular nation that didnt get its marching orders from organized religion and wasnt the least concerned with hocus pocus voodoo and imaginary friends. While this seems like a no brainer today it was literally revolutionary at the time.
guillaumeb
(42,641 posts)Well done. We agree on this.
Major Nikon
(36,827 posts)guillaumeb
(42,641 posts)And it is only a failure for you if you value harmony about logic.
Major Nikon
(36,827 posts)So perhaps you'd best work on literacy before you move on to logic. Just sayin'
Meanwhile, once again....
guillaumeb
(42,641 posts)Really.
Major Nikon
(36,827 posts)Just because you assert something, doesn't make it so. I get that concept is difficult for you, but nonetheless bullshit has been called and your only answer is gibberish.
Voltaire2
(13,037 posts)that is not obviously deplorable, posts without any reflection, backfills desperately when content fails even superficial analysis.
Repeat.
MineralMan
(146,308 posts)It's open. I signed up to contribute to it. I haven't yet, but there's no vetting at all. Most of what is posted there is superficial.
But, you use what you have, I guess.
guillaumeb
(42,641 posts)but it is the usual.
Major Nikon
(36,827 posts)guillaumeb
(42,641 posts)Major Nikon
(36,827 posts)Your "reponse" (sic) needs some work.
Major Nikon
(36,827 posts)guillaumeb
(42,641 posts)and one way is to introduce different people, and hope that they will learn how much they have in common with each other.
Major Nikon
(36,827 posts)guillaumeb
(42,641 posts)Was it intentional irony?