Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Major Nikon

(36,827 posts)
Sun Mar 17, 2019, 08:02 PM Mar 2019

When Buddhists Were a "National Security Threat"

Religious discrimination stoked the fear behind the mass incarceration of Japanese Americans as much as racism did, explains scholar and Zen priest Duncan Ryuken Williams.

Duncan Ryuken Williams

On February 19th, 1942, President Franklin Delano Roosevelt issued an executive order designating military zones along the West Coast and laying the groundwork for US authorities to remove citizens of Japanese descent from their homes and imprison them in camps. While it is widely acknowledged that racism was central to this shameful chapter of American history, the role of religious discrimination cannot be overlooked, says scholar and Soto Zen priest Duncan Ryuken Williams.

“There was a time in our country’s history when Buddhism was considered not only un-American but . . . anti-American,” explains Williams, the director of the Shinso Ito Center for Japanese Religions and Culture at the University of Southern California. “Buddhist priests, Shinto priests—they were designated as national security threats.”
https://tricycle.org/trikedaily/japanese-buddhism-internment/

It's important to remember that German and Italian immigrants and their descendants weren't imprisoned during WWII, almost certainly since they were predominantly Christian.
5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
When Buddhists Were a "National Security Threat" (Original Post) Major Nikon Mar 2019 OP
Well of course the USA is a secular government Voltaire2 Mar 2019 #1
Even if it does, that's just "human nature" Major Nikon Mar 2019 #3
The word is "Alien." MineralMan Mar 2019 #2
I think the US is a bit different Major Nikon Mar 2019 #4
There is much diversity in the US. That's true. MineralMan Mar 2019 #5

Voltaire2

(13,051 posts)
1. Well of course the USA is a secular government
Mon Mar 18, 2019, 05:55 AM
Mar 2019

This sort of intolerance would never happen in a theocracy.

Or something like that.

Major Nikon

(36,827 posts)
3. Even if it does, that's just "human nature"
Mon Mar 18, 2019, 09:34 AM
Mar 2019

Unless of course we are talking about something benevolent. In that case religion gets all the credit.

MineralMan

(146,317 posts)
2. The word is "Alien."
Mon Mar 18, 2019, 09:15 AM
Mar 2019

Alien in the sense of being different, non-conforming, and visibly not part of the vast majority. The Japanese-American citizens who were sent to the camps looked different, behaved differently, and worshiped differently. Despite many of them being native-born US citizens, they were treated as "aliens," and fear of what is different led to their imprisonment and confiscation of their property.

Chinese immigrants were excluded by law, as well.

If you are different, you are an "alien" in people's minds and therefore considered to be dangerous. This is a common pattern in human societies. We fear what we do not understand, and make very little effort to improve our understanding. The United States is no different from any other country in that regard, to our shame.

Major Nikon

(36,827 posts)
4. I think the US is a bit different
Mon Mar 18, 2019, 09:43 AM
Mar 2019

The history of the US is written with diversity. It's that diversity which made us strong. The problem is diversity eventually evolves into a national identity. This then subjects us to the same forces of demagoguery which so easily affect other nations with homogeneous populations.

MineralMan

(146,317 posts)
5. There is much diversity in the US. That's true.
Mon Mar 18, 2019, 09:51 AM
Mar 2019

However, we operate on the principle of majority rule, at least psychologically. What that means is that any identifiable minority group can be identified and demonized by the majority. That's also a part of our history, and it's not a pleasant part of our history to consider.

The tyranny of the majority is a real thing. It shouldn't exist, based on our founding principles, but does exist, due to the belief on some people's parts that the majority rules in all things. It's a paradoxical element in our society.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»When Buddhists Were a "Na...