America's war on blasphemy

[salvorhardin]

In 2007, George Kalman received notice that he had violated a law against blasphemy. But Kalman wasn't in Pakistan, Egypt, or any of the other Middle Eastern countries that have burst into violence over an anti-Muslim YouTube video. No, Kalman was right here in Pennsylvania. After filling out a form to register his new film company as "I Choose Hell Productions L.L.C.," the Downingtown resident got a letter informing him that his request was rejected under a state law barring "blasphemy, profane cursing, or swearing" in corporate names.

At the time, just five other states still had anti-blasphemy laws on the books. But such measures were ubiquitous across America for three centuries, from the founding of the colonies into the mid-20th century. As we try to understand the current anger and mayhem in the Middle East, then, we might pause to examine our own history of religious intolerance.

It starts, like so much else, with the Puritans. Although we still tell our kids that the Puritans came to the New World to find "freedom," their laws tell another story. In 1636, for instance, the Massachusetts Bay Colony made blasphemy - defined as "a cursing of God by atheism, or the like" - punishable by death.

So did the colony of Maryland, in its famous 1649 "Act of Toleration." We remember that law as granting rights to Catholics, forgetting that it omitted Jews; indeed, the measure made it a capital crime to deny Jesus Christ as the son of God. It also specified death at the stake as the penalty for blasphemy, defined as "acursing or wicked speaking of God."

Link: http://www.philly.com/philly/opinion/inquirer/20121002_America_s_war_on_blasphemy.html

[ButterflyBlood]

1. That law is obviously unconstitutional

And as the article notes was tossed out by a judge allowing this guy to name his company what he wanted. Making comparisons to modern day Middle Eastern countries absurd.

[salvorhardin]

2. Reading comprehension is an under appreciated skill

[Oregonian]

3. Why should he have had to incur the expense of a lawsuit?

That right there is actionable. It's no easy thing, when you're starting a business, to pay a lawyer and court costs.

[cbayer]

4. Sometimes it takes a case like to to get a dusty old law reopened and rejected,

which is exactly what happened.