Religion
Related: About this forumNothing Fails Like Prayer
Consider, though, that in third-world countries there are faithful believers who are praying to God because theyre starving to death or are succumbing to diseases that can be cured with modern medicine that isn't available to them for a variety of reasons, usually associated with money. Speaking of money, there are hundreds of thousands of people who have lost their jobs and are praying for God to give them another one, and to provide for their sustenance and health while they are unemployed.
It would seem that God is behaving like quite the jerk by ignoring all those sick, starving children and allowing entire families to be put out on the street, but chooses to send an apartment manager to unlock the door of an inconvenienced resident.
--snip--
When a group of people prays about fixing up an old womans dilapidated house, and then people show up with hammers, it's not an act of their God. Its just a group of well-meaning people who made a choice to help out someone in need. Nothing wrong with that, except for the whole God led me to do it part. Chances are pretty good that if the group were ardent atheists, theyd have done it anyhow.
As Steven Weinberg has so eloquently stated,
With or without religion, good people can behave well and bad people can do evil; but for good people to do evil that takes religion.
http://www.goddiscussion.com/104770/nothing-fails-like-prayer-2/
mr blur
(7,753 posts)Flabbergasted
(7,826 posts)"prayer is a complete failure", but I'm not so sure about prayer being answered by an all powerful being either. I'd chalk it up to thought has an effect. We often think that our thoughts reside in a vacuum. They do not. A thought that is attached to a real need, that another can provide, is the basis for understanding why prayer seems to work.
On another note I have not done an exhaustive study of miracles but such things do occur and seem to lie outside of this paradigm. Does this indicate that there is a god? Some say yes; others will just completely reject the notion of a miracle completely. To me it remains unexplained.
cleanhippie
(19,705 posts)Really? Like what?
Flabbergasted
(7,826 posts)cleanhippie
(19,705 posts)I'm gonna go ahead and assume that no actual miracle will be presented to support the claim that miracles do, I'm fact, happen.
It would be quite easy to show my assumption wrong. Lets see if it can be done.
mike_c
(36,281 posts)I haven't found any miracles yet. Perhaps you could describe one. Just one?
cleanhippie
(19,705 posts)Thanks for playing.
Warren Stupidity
(48,181 posts)Feel free to google it yourself. This was designed to be an unimpeachable scientific study of intercessionary prayer, funded by a pro-religion foundation and conducted at Harvard. It found that there was at best zero benefit.
Phillip McCleod
(1,837 posts)when the person being prayed for knew the praying was going on
Ian David
(69,059 posts)Sekhmets Daughter
(7,515 posts)When I was 13 or 14 years old and still being dragged to Wednesday night prayer meetings, I learned a valuable lesson about prayer. The husband of one of the church members was diagnosed with acute leukemia. The couple had 2 children, 1 a year younger than I and one 2 years older. I was more than happy to pray for their father to be healed. But, that was not what the church was praying for.... Nope, they were praying that he would "accept Jesus into his heart as his Lord and Savior" I was totally baffled until I realized that they had little to no real faith in the healing power of prayer and complete faith in the fact that a dying man will grasp at straws. Sure enough, when the church bulletin announced his passing it was with the joyous report that his soul had been saved.
Ancient cultures prayed to stones, trees or stone gods and goddesses etc. because prayer offers comfort and refocuses the mind on the positive. However, there is no such thing as answered prayer.
Speck Tater
(10,618 posts)"Outside of the obvious, glaring reality that there is no God,..."
I agree that there most probably is no such thing as a god, but there is no proof one way or the other. To call something unprovable a "glaring, obvious reality" is to step outside the legitimate bounds of science and to enter the realm of speculation.
While I like to believe that my leap of faith that there is no god has a great deal more evidential support than the opposite leap of faith that there is a god, there's no way anyone can justify calling it a fact that there is no god.
AlbertCat
(17,505 posts)I think it IS glaringly obvious that it's simply not worth worrying about. Do we really have to preface it every time with "Though we cannot be 100% sure...."?
Speck Tater
(10,618 posts)And beside, what does "god" mean, anyway?
"god" might mean something wholly non-physical like "friendliness", or "generosity", or "Christmas Spirit", in which case "god" most certainly does "exist". But of course that depends on how we define "exist" too. So we really can't begin to discuss the issue until we agree on our definitions. A feeling of certainty is not a justification for sloppy logic.
(I'm not trying to be obnoxious, mind you. It just comes naturally to me. )
AlbertCat
(17,505 posts)Well, I think the definition of a "god" is pretty clear.
"god" might mean something wholly non-physical like "friendliness", or "generosity", or "Christmas Spirit",
Except it doesn't.
cordelia
(2,174 posts)AlbertCat
(17,505 posts)God [god]
noun
1.
the one Supreme Being, the creator and ruler of the universe.
2.
the Supreme Being considered with reference to a particular attribute: the God of Islam.
3.
( lowercase ) one of several deities, especially a male deity, presiding over some portion of worldly affairs.
4.
( often lowercase ) a supreme being according to some particular conception: the god of mercy.
5.
Christian Science. the Supreme Being, understood as Life, Truth, love, Mind, Soul, Spirit, Principle.
Gore1FL
(21,152 posts)This is webster's definition:
1
capitalized : the supreme or ultimate reality: as
a : the Being perfect in power, wisdom, and goodness who is worshipped as creator and ruler of the universe
b Christian Science : the incorporeal divine Principle ruling over all as eternal Spirit : infinite Mind
2
: a being or object believed to have more than natural attributes and powers and to require human worship; specifically : one controlling a particular aspect or part of reality
3
: a person or thing of supreme value
4
: a powerful ruler
friendliness", or "generosity", or "Christmas Spirit" are covered in 3.
Speck Tater
(10,618 posts)...An emergent property of connected consciousness. As such, "god" is created by the presence of humans, and ceases to exist when humans cease to exist. Clearly "god" did not create the universe, but was created by the universe.
You may think that the definition of "god" is pretty clear, but try to get a Christian and a Hindu to agree with what you think the pretty clear definition is. The fact is, everybody who believes in god has their own definition, and everybody who does not believe in god has their own definition.
I use the term "atheist" as shorthand for "I believe that the Christian version of god certainly does not exist. It's just so far beyond absurd as to boggle the mind."
But that doesn't mean that I could not find some personal definition of "god" in which I could believe, including the possibility of some Star-Trekish disembodied intelligence which does not meet the definition of "creator god", but is clearly trans-human.
I bring this up not because I want to convince anybody of anything, but because I enjoy speculating upon such far out possibilities. And in the final analysis, I have no idea what can or cannot exist in the vastness of the cosmos (or in alternate dimensions or parallel universes, or sub-Planck-length universes, or... etc.)
AlbertCat
(17,505 posts)That's all very sweet, but you don't get to make up your own definition of words.
Speck Tater
(10,618 posts)I'm just joining in the fun.
The most important thing to bear in mind mind is:
[font size=5]I don't take any discussion of god and religion seriously. To me they are all nothing more than an occasion for some light-hearted philosophical fooling around.[/font]
There is absolutely no point whatsoever in having a serious discussion about god or religion. There's nothing meaningful that can be said, and absolutely zero chance of discovering anything or settling any dispute. Such discussions must, therefore, be approached with tongue in cheek, and a sense of humor.
In other words, lighten up.
AlbertCat
(17,505 posts)No they don't.
They make up what attributes their god might have and what powers it possess, but...
You'll notice all but 1 definition above has "supreme being" in it. "Being" is the key word. A god is not an idea, or emotion or an action. It is a being.
These "god is universal love" -like definitions are a new phenomenon...20th century...late 19th century at the earliest. They seem to be a desperate attempt to keep a god relevant.
AlbertCat
(17,505 posts)A-men! It's like having a serious discussion about Sarah Palin or Rick Santorum.
But it is kinda fun to see what mumbo jumbo not-so- Humblebum will regurgitate.
humblebum
(5,881 posts)stories of people encountering some form of orbiting pottery or having some mystical pottery experiences either.
AlbertCat
(17,505 posts)Stories are just stories. There are more stories about people NOT encountering supernatural delusions. And thousands upon thousands of unconfirmed stories usually means it ain't true in any other situation.
But of course it's YOU.... so....
humblebum
(5,881 posts)Gore1FL
(21,152 posts)The concept is this:
I have no evidence of the non-existence of the tooth fairy. I have no evidence of the non-existence of a teapot orbiting the sun between earth and mars.
Despite my lack of evidence, it doesn't mean a 50% chance either way. I can go to bed at night with a pretty good assumption that neither the tooth fairy or the teapot I described exist, even if I can't prove it.
Hopefully that clarifies what the other poster was referencing.
zbdent
(35,392 posts)to help prevent you from starving to death or curing your cancer ...
or helping a whole bunch of people, including Jews, from being slaughtered by a madman in the 1940s ...
BTW, if God created everything, then he created Satan and Evil ...
rug
(82,333 posts)No wonder he left.
Somebody should have taught him that prayer is not a spiritual ATM.
Lacipyt
(58 posts)Because it reminds me that contrary to what so many insist, there is, indeed, a religious tinge to your belief system.
When you offer, "But according to the praying Christian, it was the hand of God that made the Super show up 'just at that moment' to unlock their door," I must ask, what type of "Christian" are you referring to? There are many denominations of Christianity in America alone, and sociologists have written quite a bit about the differences that arise within dominations that are from different geographic and cultural locations.
I think what you're doing is defining prayer a specific way, and then insisting that such an action is foolish. But such straw men are easily knocked over and offer responses only to those who define the term as precisely as you.
It would explain your vamping on Weinberg's dogma, a statement I have encountered many times, and which is chewed and passed from mouth to mouth but never swallowed. Perhaps you can offer me the data that demonstrates that statement as being factual and not merely a statement of faith? Or do you, like all I've asked, feel such profound statements require nothing as laughable as "proof."
It is a wonder, indeed, that a physicist would think it OK to make a claim and not offer even the slightest hint of support save the prejudices of his audience.
Warren Stupidity
(48,181 posts)prayer. If conducted properly, such an experiment would leave rational atheists and skeptics with no choice but to accept that prayer works.
I propose a Study for the Theraputic Effect of Prayer. Perhaps the medical college at Harvard could help.
Oh wait.
Phillip McCleod
(1,837 posts)Rambis
(7,774 posts)upaloopa
(11,417 posts)Why does it matter to people who don't pray if prayer works or not?
I mean it matters to themselves I guess as a support for their choice but if I pray and think it works who's business is it but mine?
MichaelSoE
(1,576 posts)1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)Prayer, for this sojouning soul, is an example of classic prpblem solving. When one prays, they are communicating a specific need/problem albeit, IMHO, to themselves. The prayer allows us to think about the need/problem, in mindful way and with the expectation that the need is fillable or problem, solvable. This thought allows us to derive solutions.
But that said ...
I preacher, for whom I have a great deal of respect, told me: Prayer works ... God answers all prayers. It's just sometimes God says 'No'."
cleanhippie
(19,705 posts)But I get what you are saying.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)a difference between "Meditation" and "Prayer", other than the religious/atheist terminology distinction?
Gore1FL
(21,152 posts)There is an implied commune with God in "prayer."
Being an atheist, I see no useful difference between the two.
cleanhippie
(19,705 posts)In modern parlance, yes, there is a very distinct difference. One is inward self-reflection, the other is a call to a deity for favor.
BlueStreak
(8,377 posts)The people starving in Bangladesh who pray and still starve to death are no longer around to tell how their prayers were not answered.
The people who die of pneumonia after praying are not around to tell how their prayers were not answered.
Only the ones who happened to recover after praying are around to tell their stories.
It is "survival of the fittest tall tales" in action
rbixby
(1,140 posts)the more people you have praying for you, the more likely it is to come true