Irony: Catholics not accepting charges against Cardinal O'Brien without solid evidence.

[cleanhippie]

[hrmjustin]

1. Where do you see that?

[Tempest]

2. They believe in something they can provide no evidence it exists

But apparently they want evidence in this case, despite three different priests making the same claim.

[hrmjustin]

3. What I am saying is if this guy resigned and is not going to conclave that would be a sign that

he is guilty to me. My question to the OP is where do you see Catholics not believing he is guilty. Is this just opinion or was there a story on it?

[cleanhippie]

4. From the reactions and comments to the various news stories about him.

It is simply my observation.

[hrmjustin]

6. It just strange to me that if the guy resigned and is not going to conclave that anyone would have

a hard time believing the charges. But some people think their clergy walk on water. Christians have always given Christianity a bad name.

[Tempest]

7. A simple search on the story is sufficient

And a reading of the comments.

Catholics are in denial about O'Brien.

[Tempest]

5. "where do you see Catholics not believing he is guilty"

In every social media web site that allows for reader comments on the story.

And on newspaper web sites that allows for reader comments on the story.

FB has a page that defends this guy.

[hrmjustin]

8. I am not saying your wrong I just don't understand how people are having a hard time

believing this story.

[cleanhippie]

9. Me too! And the irony is absolutely delicious.