Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ZombieHorde

(29,047 posts)
Fri Jan 27, 2012, 09:53 PM Jan 2012

Do you think emperor worship is in BETWEEN atheism and theism?

One one hand, the emperor can usually be proven to exist, on the other hand, fantastic attributes are assigned to him.

The adherents don't need to have any faith in his existence, but they do need to have faith in his assigned attributes. Seems like a strange mix of atheism and theism to me.

What do you think?

34 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Do you think emperor worship is in BETWEEN atheism and theism? (Original Post) ZombieHorde Jan 2012 OP
I think it's ridiculous... mzteris Jan 2012 #1
I understand DUers don't adhere to emperor worship, ZombieHorde Jan 2012 #3
Flaw: Atheists do not Worship! The Sushi Bandit Jan 2012 #2
I agree atheists don't worship, except perhaps as a metaphor, ZombieHorde Jan 2012 #4
what does atheism have to do with it ? it's still a belief, an atheist can support some dictator JI7 Jan 2012 #5
Between. nt ZombieHorde Jan 2012 #7
not atheism at all mzteris Jan 2012 #6
Between. nt ZombieHorde Jan 2012 #8
can't be if he and they both think mzteris Jan 2012 #11
If Jesus ever existed as a historical person NAO Jan 2012 #9
In the case of Christianity, there is also the Heavenly Father. nt ZombieHorde Jan 2012 #13
Heavely Father doesn't count in your OP, because he's not human NAO Jan 2012 #23
I was thinking Christianity was mostly theist because of the Heavenly Father. ZombieHorde Jan 2012 #24
It's the kind I best like to receive, yes jberryhill Jan 2012 #10
Especially tama Jan 2012 #12
Zing! jberryhill Jan 2012 #17
History says no. Warren Stupidity Jan 2012 #14
Interesting take. nt ZombieHorde Jan 2012 #15
It's just another expression of theism. alfredo Jan 2012 #16
If you're willing to go kamikaze for the Emperor of Japan, provis99 Jan 2012 #18
Not exactly... LeftishBrit Jan 2012 #19
Does Steve Jobs count? westerebus Jan 2012 #20
Funny. nt ZombieHorde Jan 2012 #27
They are a cult. westerebus Jan 2012 #32
Great questions cbayer Jan 2012 #21
I'd say it carries most of the same psychology as god-worship. backscatter712 Jan 2012 #22
Why would it be between? darkstar3 Jan 2012 #25
Yea, I guess it was an idea that didn't go anywhere. nt ZombieHorde Jan 2012 #26
If you're talking about the Japanese emperor, he was never considered a god Lydia Leftcoast Jan 2012 #28
Don't know about ZombieHorde... LeftishBrit Jan 2012 #29
Don't forget the pharaohs. ChadwickHenryWard Jan 2012 #31
Be careful saying that around a Japanese right-winger... onager Jan 2012 #33
Your statement about Japanese religious attitudes is true Lydia Leftcoast Jan 2012 #34
That's kind of a narrow-minded definition of "theism." ChadwickHenryWard Jan 2012 #30

ZombieHorde

(29,047 posts)
3. I understand DUers don't adhere to emperor worship,
Fri Jan 27, 2012, 09:57 PM
Jan 2012

I was wondering how DUers would categorize emperor worship on the atheist/theist scale.

ZombieHorde

(29,047 posts)
4. I agree atheists don't worship, except perhaps as a metaphor,
Fri Jan 27, 2012, 09:59 PM
Jan 2012

but I am not talking about atheists, I am talking about a possible stance between atheism and theism.

JI7

(89,252 posts)
5. what does atheism have to do with it ? it's still a belief, an atheist can support some dictator
Fri Jan 27, 2012, 10:12 PM
Jan 2012

but they wouldn't believe they had some god powers or anything like that.

NAO

(3,425 posts)
9. If Jesus ever existed as a historical person
Fri Jan 27, 2012, 10:24 PM
Jan 2012

(and there is a strong case that he did not - http://jesuspuzzle.humanists.net/home.htm is one very good example)

then Christianity would be the worship of a once living person who is now dead but came back from the dead so I guess...

What I think is that people make up religions - sometimes based on idols, sometimes on concepts of invisible beings, sometimes on hybred human/god beings...but I don't want to attempt a taxonomy of religions.

NAO

(3,425 posts)
23. Heavely Father doesn't count in your OP, because he's not human
Sat Jan 28, 2012, 02:42 PM
Jan 2012

I thought this was where to rank emperor worship on the theism continuum; plain old Heavenly Father theism is just that.

ZombieHorde

(29,047 posts)
24. I was thinking Christianity was mostly theist because of the Heavenly Father.
Sat Jan 28, 2012, 04:23 PM
Jan 2012

However, I don't think anyone actually agrees with my original idea. The polytheist comment was pretty interesting to me.

 

Warren Stupidity

(48,181 posts)
14. History says no.
Fri Jan 27, 2012, 10:43 PM
Jan 2012

Emperor deities are in the middle between polytheism and monotheism. If you want a progression it is polytheism -> monotheism -> atheism. However I don't think there is a big case for that either as there wash a fair amount of at least near atheism within the greek classical philosophical tradition.

alfredo

(60,074 posts)
16. It's just another expression of theism.
Fri Jan 27, 2012, 10:54 PM
Jan 2012

What's the difference between a revelation and a hallucination?

I have no confidence in the honesty, or sanity of those who told the stories. They are beyond fact checking.

 

provis99

(13,062 posts)
18. If you're willing to go kamikaze for the Emperor of Japan,
Sat Jan 28, 2012, 01:00 AM
Jan 2012

it is definitely theism. there is no greater test of faith than to give up your own life to your deity.

LeftishBrit

(41,208 posts)
19. Not exactly...
Sat Jan 28, 2012, 05:08 AM
Jan 2012

I think emperor worship is theocracy taken to extremes. Theocracy involves having rulers that are spokesmen for and enforcers of religion, and invested with divine authority. In emperor worship, the rulers are not only invested with divine authority; they are themselves divine. Rather than being in between theism and atheism, I would say that emperor worship is one end of a religious continuum, where the other pole is represented by belief systems that avoid worshipping specific deities: including atheism; agnosticism; nontheistic religions such as Taoism; and Pantheism. Politically, the opposite pole from emperor worship would be extreme forms of egalitarianism, and/or true anarchism.



westerebus

(2,976 posts)
20. Does Steve Jobs count?
Sat Jan 28, 2012, 09:41 AM
Jan 2012

In the land of the i-junk he remains the worshipped emperor by his followers if you stretch the analogy.

westerebus

(2,976 posts)
32. They are a cult.
Sun Jan 29, 2012, 03:37 PM
Jan 2012

In a secular sense.

The emotional attachment to and the identification with its leader is close enough to follower status.

The hype related to the new offerings is documented.

The personal "touch" is there.

The iconology, pun included at no extra charge, is very identifiable.

Defense of the organization, its products and its leaders are articles of faith among the participants.

You seen this picture before, as we all have, we just assume it's normal.

Funny how indoctrintion works.

cbayer

(146,218 posts)
21. Great questions
Sat Jan 28, 2012, 01:25 PM
Jan 2012

I have never thought about this in terms of emperor's, but have often wondered about monarchs.


They are treated as if they are one step closer to god than the common man. And then there is the strong emphasis on bloodlines that seems to confirm that they are somehow special.

I don't have a lot of knowledge in this area, so would be interested in what others might have to say.

backscatter712

(26,355 posts)
22. I'd say it carries most of the same psychology as god-worship.
Sat Jan 28, 2012, 01:34 PM
Jan 2012

The same viral meme-spreading, the same in-group/out-group behavior that leads to people acting like violent meth-addicted chimpanzees, the same use of the rhetoric to brainwash the masses and control them...

The most recent prominent example is North Korea, and their deification and worship of Kim Il-Sung, Kim Jong-Il and now Kim Jong-Un. They even attributed superpowers to the Dear Leader.

So my answer is that I consider emperor-worship or king-worship or dictator-worship to be equivalent to god worship.

Atheism is merely the state of mind that has the absence of something that apparently needs to be worshiped.

darkstar3

(8,763 posts)
25. Why would it be between?
Sat Jan 28, 2012, 04:37 PM
Jan 2012

The concept you describe, of worshipping an emporer or similar powerful figure, is referred to as "deification" for a reason. Furthermore, in what definition of theism is there a requirement for blind faith in the existence of the deity in question?

Lydia Leftcoast

(48,217 posts)
28. If you're talking about the Japanese emperor, he was never considered a god
Sat Jan 28, 2012, 10:24 PM
Jan 2012

in the sense that Westerners think of a god, a supernatural being who can work miracles, etc.

He was a kami (honorific form kami-sama), which can mean god but also refers to anyone who has some kind of charisma or special abilities.

Emperor Hirohito and his predecessors were considered the descendants of the Sun Goddess but not in any way immortal or all-powerful themselves.

All that was gone after World War II.

Do you know that the weekend Hirohito died in 1989, when Japanese TV was all-emperor all-the-time, was the greatest weekend of business EVER for Japan's video stores? That's how much present-day Japanese "worship" the emperor.

LeftishBrit

(41,208 posts)
29. Don't know about ZombieHorde...
Sun Jan 29, 2012, 05:30 AM
Jan 2012

but I wasn't even thinking about Japan in this context. Emperor worship was a big thing at times in the Roman Empire; and has recent parallels in the extreme adulation given to certain leaders - the biggest parallel nowadays is North Korea.

onager

(9,356 posts)
33. Be careful saying that around a Japanese right-winger...
Mon Jan 30, 2012, 02:11 AM
Jan 2012
Mayor Who Faulted Hirohito Is Shot

By DAVID E. SANGER, Special to The New York Times, Published: January 19, 1990

The Mayor of Nagasaki, who broke one of the nation's most sensitive taboos by saying a year ago that Emperor Hirohito bore some responsibility for World War II, was shot today, and the police arrested a 40-year-old ultranationalist.

The Mayor, Hitoshi Motoshima, was reported in critical condition but out of danger tonight after two hours of surgery. Mr. Motoshima, 67 years old, who received many threats after he refused to retract his unusually blunt comments about the Emperor, was shot once in the chest at close range as he left City Hall at 3 P.M. today.

Within five hours, the police had arrested Kazumi Tajiri, whom they identified as a sub-chief of a small right-wing group, the Spiritual Justice School. They said that Mr. Tajiri had been apprehended at an inn not far from City Hall, and that he had immediately volunteered, ''I shot Mayor Motoshima.''

The shooting sent a chill through Japan, a seeming echo from the 1930's when Tokyo was thrown into near-anarchy by a wave of assassinations by right-wing military officers.


http://www.nytimes.com/1990/01/19/world/mayor-who-faulted-hirohito-is-shot.html

Funniest phrase I heard in Japan: "Half of Japanese are Shinto. Half are Buddhist. And half don't have any religion at all."


Lydia Leftcoast

(48,217 posts)
34. Your statement about Japanese religious attitudes is true
Mon Jan 30, 2012, 02:36 AM
Jan 2012

The predominant religions in Japan don't require regular attendance at services, and Buddhism and Shinto are used for different purposes. It is common to have Shinto weddings and Buddhist funerals.

ChadwickHenryWard

(862 posts)
30. That's kind of a narrow-minded definition of "theism."
Sun Jan 29, 2012, 12:50 PM
Jan 2012

Just because believer in say, ancient Rome, believed different things about some of their gods than most people do today does not mean they were not religious believers. It is a very narrow definition of "belief" or "theism" if it only includes modern (and Western, I might add) religious ideas.

Further, I don't think that just because the existence of one of their gods can be verified that makes them atheists. Recall that there were actual atheists in the classical world, and I don't believe any of them assented to the divinity of the emperor on and intellectual level.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»Do you think emperor wors...