Religion
Related: About this forumWhy this atheist likes the Bible
BY HERB SILVERMAN
October 15 at 8:02 am
U.S. Vice President Joseph Joe Biden, left, places his hand on the Biden Family Bible held by his wife Jill Biden, center, as he takes the oath of office from Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor, right, during and official ceremony at the Naval Observatory,in Washington, D.C., U.S., on Sunday, Jan. 20, 2013. Photographer: Carolyn Kaster/Pool via Bloomberg
What do Christian fundamentalists and many atheists have in common? Both read the Bible as if it were meant to be taken literally, and both quote selected passages to buttress their case. Some atheists, for instance, cite biblical passages that justify stoning for heresy, blasphemy, adultery, homosexuality, working on Sabbath, worshipping graven images, and practicing sorcery.
While atheists might attack or make fun of the Bible because of biblical literalists, it is important to distinguish between the quality of a book and the behavior of its adherents. For better or worse, the Bible and the many religions it spawned have deeply influenced our culture and the world. For that reason alone, the Bible is worth reading. Although atheists rank highest in religious knowledge, atheists should try to understand why so many love the Bible even if they havent actually read it.
Some atheists make the same mistake as theists, treating the Bible as either all good or all bad. While it contains many boring, anachronistic, contradictory, and repetitive sections, it also has passages with rich and diverse meanings. The same can be said for Greek mythologyfictional tales that were once considered religious texts.
As a child, I enjoyed reading Aesops fables and biblical stories. Both have talking animals, along with moral lessons and universal truths. Leaving aside the question of which imparts better advice (though no Bible story was as consequential for me as Aesops The boy who cried wolf), at least Aesops stories are recognized as fables.
more at link
dimbear
(6,271 posts)were to be taken seriously. (My emendation.)
The many parts of the book which are an instruction manual for slaughter are viewed with pleasure by the first and dismay by the second, but with the same high seriousness. It's the casual 'believers' who look at them and see butterflies.
cbayer
(146,218 posts)cherry picking, imo.
cleanhippie
(19,705 posts)And this is being bookmarked for the next time you accuse another of cherry picking.