On her 100th birthday, Chicago nun still wants to become a Catholic priest
Despite 90 years of waiting, Sister Vivian Ivantic hasnt given up hope that one day, women will be allowed to serve as priests in the Catholic Church.
By Carol Kuruvilla / NEW YORK DAILY NEWS
Wednesday, August 28, 2013, 7:09 PM
A Chicago nun is celebrating her 100th birthday today but theres something missing.
Ever since she was 10 years old, Sister Vivian Ivantic has wanted to become a Catholic priest.
Ivantic joined the Benedictines when she was 20 years old and since then, shes been hoping for a change in the Catholic Churchs policy toward female ordination.
"We need women in church offices," Ivantic told The Chicago Tribune. "It won't come in my lifetime, but it will come."
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/100th-birthday-chicago-nun-catholic-priest-article-1.1439810
http://www.osbchicago.org/
meow2u3
(24,759 posts)Priests typically retire at age 70.
rug
(82,333 posts)She's seen many changes.
Fortinbras Armstrong
(4,473 posts)Other than rampant sexism, of course.
(I have previously posted on the vacuity of Vatican arguments against the ordination of women.)
ColesCountyDem
(6,943 posts)I'm the child of a mixed marriage-- Catholic and American Baptist-- and was educated by sisters from K-8. While I have known many fine priests, I have know even more truly kind, caring, good Christian sisters. If the princes of the Church could, for just a moment, put down their own ambitions and prejudices and take a clear-eyed look at their own experiences, they would agree.
I retain great love for the Holy Roman Catholic Church, but I now attend an American Baptist church, where women are treated as equals.
47of74
(18,470 posts)So many of the problems besetting the Catholic Church today are due to the fact that the priesthood is all male, as is the senior leadership. I'm not saying there wouldn't be any problems at all if women were admitted to the priesthood, or if women were in the senior ranks of the church, up to and including the Papacy. However I think that the church would not have anywhere near the level of problems it has today if women were able to truly lead and truly treated as equals instead of being relegated to second class citizenship in the Roman church.
ColesCountyDem
(6,943 posts)IrishAyes
(6,151 posts)because when a neighbor died and duty almost forced me to attend her funeral, the pastor praised her to the skies for always submitting to her husband "as she should." Made it very hard for me to keep a holy mind on that occasion.
ColesCountyDem
(6,943 posts)The largest single Baptist denomination is the Southern Baptist Convention, who are VERY conservative (Jerry Falwell and Pat Robertson are Southern Baptists, e.g.). There are also Freewill Baptists (conservative, but not reactionary), Primitive Baptists (pacificists without ordained clergy), General Baptists (moderates), etc. .
American Baptists are the proud descendants of the 'northern' Baptists, who split from their southern brothers and sisters over the issue of slavery in the late 1840's. They, the Quakers and the Congregationalist churches provided a majority of the funding and 'stations' for the Underground Railroad.
American Baptists first accepted women as 'fully equal' within the church shortly after the Civil War ended, ordaining women as pastors and entitling them to hold any office within a congregation, i.e., deacon, trustee, moderator, etc. . The first nfemale U.S. military chaplain to attain the rank of General was an American Baptist.
In short, we are 'progressive' in every sense of that word.
IrishAyes
(6,151 posts)I won't see it either, but the generation after mine could. Sooner the better. Hate to say it, but the Anglicans are one up on us in this regard.