Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

No Vested Interest

(5,167 posts)
Sun Nov 24, 2013, 02:25 AM Nov 2013

It occurred to me tonight that Pope Francis could conceivably be

Time Magazine's Man of the Year 2013.
Certainly a contender, with the news and interest his papacy and his words and actions have generated.

What do DUers in this group think?

15 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
It occurred to me tonight that Pope Francis could conceivably be (Original Post) No Vested Interest Nov 2013 OP
OK by me. nt NYC_SKP Nov 2013 #1
that would be an interesting choice. hrmjustin Nov 2013 #2
Agree. JimDandy Nov 2013 #4
I'm 100% for it! vlakitti Nov 2013 #3
Easily. Not even close, in my opinion. UrbScotty Nov 2013 #5
He's a contender. I'd still like to see a records of accomplishments first. rug Nov 2013 #6
I don't know that accomplishments are the major criteria. No Vested Interest Nov 2013 #7
I recall reading the chief criterion is making news. rug Nov 2013 #8
Yep. Francis certainly qualifies on that score. No Vested Interest Nov 2013 #9
I'm 100% for it too. IrishAyes Nov 2013 #10
Well, what do you think, kids? Are we prescient or not? nt No Vested Interest Dec 2013 #11
Good call! rug Dec 2013 #12
Like I said, I had a hard time figuring out who could even come close. UrbScotty Dec 2013 #13
Edward Snowden was the runner-up No Vested Interest Dec 2013 #15
He shoots. He scores. Kingofalldems Dec 2013 #14

UrbScotty

(23,980 posts)
5. Easily. Not even close, in my opinion.
Sun Nov 24, 2013, 03:08 PM
Nov 2013

I mean, who else is there?

Fun fact: John XXIII and John Paul II were each Person of the Year one year.

No Vested Interest

(5,167 posts)
7. I don't know that accomplishments are the major criteria.
Sun Nov 24, 2013, 05:37 PM
Nov 2013

From Wikipedia (for my own clarity): 'a person, group, idea, or object that "for better or for worse", ...had done the most to influence the events of the year.'
I'll agree that he's still only a contender; there may be another that better fits the profile.

No Vested Interest

(5,167 posts)
9. Yep. Francis certainly qualifies on that score.
Sun Nov 24, 2013, 06:05 PM
Nov 2013

Something new published every week, it seems - washing, hugging, kissing, driving, etc.

IrishAyes

(6,151 posts)
10. I'm 100% for it too.
Sun Nov 24, 2013, 07:14 PM
Nov 2013

But won't make any real $ bets since that might upset His Holiness!

BTW, as a kid and younger adult, when I knew I'd done something awful, I'd say "How will I ever explain THAT one to the Pope?"

I didn't worry too much about my parents and God, all of whom I felt were nearby and known entities. But the Pope was in Rome, and that was a long way off. So I couldn't be too sure about his reaction, no matter how nice people might say he was. Obviously I was never granted an audience!

UrbScotty

(23,980 posts)
13. Like I said, I had a hard time figuring out who could even come close.
Wed Dec 11, 2013, 04:56 PM
Dec 2013

I wonder if the folks at Time thought the same way? IMO, none of the other finalists have made the news quite like he has, but maybe they thought otherwise.

No Vested Interest

(5,167 posts)
15. Edward Snowden was the runner-up
Wed Dec 11, 2013, 10:07 PM
Dec 2013

Time representatives have said it was a close call.
Both men were largely unknown one year ago and both have had a large impact on the entire world within the last year.

Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»Catholicism and Orthodox Christianity»It occurred to me tonight...