Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
Fri Dec 21, 2012, 11:27 AM Dec 2012

Having a probability mental block

Problem 1:

I have a bag of 136 unique items.

I reach into the bag, pull out one item.

I return the item to the bag.

I do this 45 times.

After the 45 draws from the bag, how many different unique items have I drawn?

------------

Problem 2:

I have a bag of 136 unique items.

I reach into the bag and pull out three items.

I return the items to the bag.

I do this 15 times.

After the 15 draws, how many different unique items have I drawn?

---------

I'm coming up with about 38 for Problem 1, and about 43 for Problem 2, rounding to the nearest whole number.

9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Having a probability mental block (Original Post) jberryhill Dec 2012 OP
1) A minimum of 1, a max of 45 Jackpine Radical Dec 2012 #1
Yeah, yeah... solve for 0, 1, infinity, and everything else is a special case.... jberryhill Dec 2012 #2
45 and 15 tama Dec 2012 #3
Perhaps I didn't state the problem clearly enough jberryhill Dec 2012 #4
That was understood tama Dec 2012 #6
I'm dealing with an issue relating to jury pools jberryhill Dec 2012 #7
So you're asking for the probability distributions. Jackpine Radical Dec 2012 #8
Not the distributions jberryhill Dec 2012 #9
39-40 certain for 1 and 80+% chance of 45 for 2. Festivito Dec 2012 #5
 

tama

(9,137 posts)
3. 45 and 15
Fri Dec 21, 2012, 11:50 AM
Dec 2012

it really is that simple, if you don't confuse your thinking by various interpretations of Law of Identity.

 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
4. Perhaps I didn't state the problem clearly enough
Fri Dec 21, 2012, 11:56 AM
Dec 2012

After each draw, the items are returned to the bag.



 

tama

(9,137 posts)
6. That was understood
Fri Dec 21, 2012, 12:54 PM
Dec 2012
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Law_of_identity A=A is necessary presumption for bivalent logic and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Law_of_excluded_middle

But I see no logical necessity to believe in Law of Identity and state that the returned item would be identical with the drawn item. After each draw-return process the bag still consists of unique items regardless of the number of draws.

Note that spatiotemporally etc. in physical terms the left and right parts of Law of Identity A=A are not identical.
 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
7. I'm dealing with an issue relating to jury pools
Fri Dec 21, 2012, 01:49 PM
Dec 2012

And I assure you that when the jurors are sent back to the pool room, they are each the same person the next time they are called. Okay?

Without getting into a lot of specifics, the case involves an allegation of bias in juror selection.

Jackpine Radical

(45,274 posts)
8. So you're asking for the probability distributions.
Fri Dec 21, 2012, 02:35 PM
Dec 2012

I think it's a cumulative combination problem & I'd have to look up the solution, unfortunately. Too many years since I studied or taught that stuff.

 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
9. Not the distributions
Fri Dec 21, 2012, 02:38 PM
Dec 2012

Just a back of the envelope expectation value. I don't even care what the variance is.
Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Science»Having a probability ment...