Science

DetlefK

(16,423 posts) Wed Oct 9, 2013, 07:04 AM Oct 2013

Tiny robots merge into one big robot. (video)

A collective of tiny, moving robots that rearrange to form various static structures.

9 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Tiny robots merge into one big robot. (video) (Original Post) DetlefK Oct 2013 OP

the first baby transformer!! Sancho Oct 2013 #1

The first REAL baby transformer! darkangel218 Oct 2013 #3

home movies of Optimus Prime as a child. :D roguevalley Oct 2013 #4

or the start of The Borg AllTooEasy Oct 2013 #6

Oh? sakabatou Oct 2013 #7

Very cool Goalie49009 Oct 2013 #2

Replicators. ElboRuum Oct 2013 #5

Once they do it with Lion Robots Lawlbringer Oct 2013 #8

The big question is... nikto Oct 2013 #9

Sancho

(9,070 posts)

1. the first baby transformer!!

Reply to DetlefK (Original post)

Wed Oct 9, 2013, 02:41 PM

Oct 2013

darkangel218

(13,985 posts)

3. The first REAL baby transformer!

Reply to Sancho (Reply #1)

Wed Oct 9, 2013, 03:17 PM

Oct 2013

roguevalley

(40,656 posts)

4. home movies of Optimus Prime as a child. :D

Reply to Sancho (Reply #1)

Wed Oct 9, 2013, 10:12 PM

Oct 2013

AllTooEasy

(1,260 posts)

6. or the start of The Borg

Reply to Sancho (Reply #1)

Thu Oct 10, 2013, 07:58 PM

Oct 2013

Resistance will be futile

sakabatou

(42,157 posts)

7. Oh?

Reply to Sancho (Reply #1)

Thu Oct 10, 2013, 08:09 PM

Oct 2013

Goalie49009

(748 posts)

2. Very cool

Reply to DetlefK (Original post)

Wed Oct 9, 2013, 02:47 PM

Oct 2013

ElboRuum

(4,717 posts)

5. Replicators.

Reply to DetlefK (Original post)

Thu Oct 10, 2013, 04:30 PM

Oct 2013

Stargate SG-1 had these things... for some reason, they weren't as well received.

Lawlbringer

(550 posts)

8. Once they do it with Lion Robots

Reply to DetlefK (Original post)

Mon Oct 14, 2013, 01:16 PM

Oct 2013

Then I'll be excited.

nikto

(3,284 posts)

9. The big question is...

Reply to DetlefK (Original post)

Mon Oct 14, 2013, 08:24 PM

Oct 2013

How can we weaponize this, to the max?

Reply to this discussion