Does anyone have a cheat-sheet debunking moonlanding debunkers?
For some reason a young friend of mine has suddenly acquired a bug in her ear
and is driving me crazy about the 'fake' moon landing. I read all that stuff so
long ago I don't remember it now. So I was hoping there might be a quick
'cheat sheet' format debunking the debunkers.
= new reply since forum marked as read
on the moon because you're dealing with an airless environment that doesn't slow down light, and a ton of reflective surfaces that will throw light from odd directions. The sun, earth, astronaut suits, and the lunar surface itself all throw (reflect) light. It would be like taking pictures in the desert if the desert was made of mirrors, your suit was made of mirrors, and there was a giant mirror in the sky over you. Even then, the "spotlight" effect is also a lot less pronounced in the originals. A lot of that light was put there when they touched the images.
There is a crater, but it's not humongous because gases spread out quickly in a vacuum. So much so that rockets designed to be used in space have to be designed especially to compensate for it. They'd also have been gradually reducing their thrust, down to practically nil when they hit the ground. They were compensating for a lot less weight touching down on the moon than they would landing on earth, so much less thrust would be required to begin with.
The flag was hung off an L shaped projection from the pole, and it wasn't waving, it was swinging slightly because there was less gravity and no air resistance to decrease momentum.
The dust wouldn't act like dust we're used to dealing with because of the different gravity, different air resistance, and different shape of the dust. The lack of gravity makes it kick way up into the air, then the lack of air resistance makes it fall really fast.
They found some of the tapes that were being recorded of it from a different place (Australia). You can watch the hi-def versions here: http://www.nasa.gov/multimedia/hd/apollo11_hdpage.html Which means the conspiracy apparently spans multiple countries. 
the ALSEP laser reflectors left by the Apollo Astronauts, for years.
http://spie.org/x38304.xml?ArticleID=x38304
Two) NASA recently orbited a probe called the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter around the moon, in addition to a number of other things, it took some rather high resolution shots of some of the Apollo landing sites.
http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/LRO/news/lro-briefing-20110906.html
http://www.nasa.gov/content/lunar-reconnaissance-orbiter-looks-at-apollo-12-surveyor-3-landing-sites/#.Uvcl3M6rCW4
Also, AFAIUI, the reason they don't point the Hubble at the Moon is the same reason they don't point it at the Sun, or the Earth-- the optics are designed to gather extremely low levels of light. Sun, Earth and Moon are all WAY too bright for the mission specs. No one wants to blow out a Trillion dollar telescope on something like that.
I actually work with a moon-landing denier. I honestly thought they they were a myth until I learned this about him. It's INSANE thinking and I immediately discredit EVERYTHING he says after learning this about him. He also thinks that dinosaur bones were put on earth to 'test our faith'. 
ZERO CREDIBILITY. None. Zilch. Nada.
Complete set at: http://stuffucanuse.com/fake_moon_landings/moon_landings.htm
Just way too many things wrong with this picture!
Notice the absence of stars again.
The arrows indicate the various directions in which shadows are falling, again showing evidence of inconsistent scene illumination. Yet there is something even more obviously wrong with this picture.
If the length of the lower support column of the lunar lander was 4 feet tall, this would indicate that the astronaut was over 8 feet tall, which none of the astronauts were.
Another careless mistake from NASA.