Science
Related: About this forumNewly discovered fossil could prove a problem for creationists
Source: Washington Post
Newly discovered fossil could prove a problem for creationists
By Rachel Feltman November 5 at 1:00 PM
Researchers report that they've found the missing link between an ancient aquatic predator and its ancestors on land. Ichthyosaurs, the dolphin-like reptiles that lived in the sea during the time of the dinosaurs, evolved from terrestrial creatures that made their way back into the water over time.
But the fossil record for the lineage has been spotty, without a clear link between land-based reptiles and the aquatic ichthyosaurs scientists know came after. Now, researchers report in Nature that they've found that link an amphibious ancestor of the swimming ichthyosaurs named Cartorhynchus lenticarpus.
"Many creationists have tried to portray ichthyosaurs as being contrary to evolution," said lead author Ryosuke Motani, a professor of earth and planetary sciences at the University of California Davis. "We knew based on their bone structure that they were reptiles, and that their ancestors lived on land at some time, but they were fully adapted to life in the water. So creationists would say, well, they couldn't have evolved from those reptiles, because where's the link?"
Now the gap has been filled, he said.
[font size=1]-snip-[/font]
Read more: http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/speaking-of-science/wp/2014/11/05/newly-discovered-fossil-could-prove-a-problem-for-creationists/
Related: A basal ichthyosauriform with a short snout from the Lower Triassic of China (Nature)
Scuba
(53,475 posts)randys1
(16,286 posts)Now that sounds silly, right?
Say hello to the entire teaparty.
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)This is how they work.
MisterP
(23,730 posts)it's almost like they're nothing more than an intellectually-inbred, overindulged Adventist heresy that's bankrupt in its theological, scientific, moral, philosophical, historical, and social aspects ...
defacto7
(13,485 posts)but if one's ideology exists by believing in things because they can't be proven, and that person also requires of others proof of proof to disprove their position, then it is absurdity to the extreme to bother with an argument. They will always create their world the way they want to see it. Creationism just doesn't matter so I put it on ignore.
FiveGoodMen
(20,018 posts)They want to take real science out of our classrooms.
That matters.
defacto7
(13,485 posts)Creationism as an argument in the absurd does not. Creationists on the other hand love to have a platform to peddle their tripe. There is no arguing with creationists about creationism; it's a waste of energy. The only value is arguing the law and science with our government representation about the right of human beings to be educated in facts, not religion or myth. Creationists as a group will never yield in an argument about creationism, but creationists have to yield to the law. It's up to us to make sure science is argued with sound and well managed data and that we don't get caught in the endless rhetoric called creationism.
Creationism doesn't matter... creationists as well as all other foolish panhandlers of misinformation do matter.
FiveGoodMen
(20,018 posts)"creationists have to yield to the law"
Creationist are trying hard to change the law so that the rest of us have to yield to them.
If enough get into office, they'll win.
defacto7
(13,485 posts)That's the fight! We have to fight. Creationism has lost, but the words and deeds of the right wing stupid machine rage on and must be stopped.
Fortinbras Armstrong
(4,473 posts)This one will be no different.
damyank913
(787 posts)...where happy humans lived in peace with veloceraptors.
AlbertCat
(17,505 posts)Then there's all the genome evidence......
could prove a problem....but won't...
Bigmack
(8,020 posts)science or facts affect those folks' thinking! I mean I could be wrong about this, but don't think I am! Ms Bigmack
Warpy
(111,277 posts)Nothing new about this fellow, he's been around for the whole 6000 years.
They don't believe in DNA. They still think they're solid inside, like a potato. The less they know about how the body works the better.