Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

n2doc

(47,953 posts)
Thu Jan 15, 2015, 03:37 PM Jan 2015

The Most Anti-Science Congress in Recent History Is Now in Session

BY BRIAN MERCHANT
Over the last four years, Congress developed a reputation for institutionalizing an “anti-science” attitude. During the 112th and 113th Congresses, the label was typically applied to its Republicans, who controlled the House of Representatives, and typically because of their propensity to dismiss climate change science. Typically, but not only—misinformed musings about women’s reproductive processes, support for creationist education, attempts to remove the peer review process at the National Science Foundation, and efforts to roll back funding for research programs also ignited the ire of the science-loving public.

It’s climate change that figures most prominently, though. An incredible consensus of scientists—97 percent of climatologists working in the field, according to one peer-reviewed survey—agree that greenhouse gas emissions produced by humans are warming the globe. A significant majority of congressional Republicans have consistently disagreed, and, succumbing to genuine scientific ignorance or mere political expedience, have vocally denied the science outright. Some ventured to call climate change a hoax, others falsely and repeatedly claimed the science simply wasn’t settled.

In 2010, political historian and journalist Ronald Brownstein noted that “it is difficult to identify another major political party in any democracy as thoroughly dismissive of climate science as is the GOP here.” Eileen Claussen, then the president of the Pew Center for Global Climate Change, told Brownstein that there is "no party-wide view like this anywhere in the world that I am aware of." (Now, some contenders may have emerged.) The House grew so hostile to climate science and environmental regulations that Democrats drew up a report, backed with a mountain of vote-count evidence, to try to demonstrate that Republicans were leading “The Most Anti-Environment House in the History of Congress.”

But until 2015, Republicans only controlled the House. The Democratic Party’s slim majority in the Senate served as a check on its climate change-dismissing twin. While the science-challenged House succeeded in blocking any significant legislative efforts to reduce US carbon emissions, that was essentially all it did: lock President Obama’s environmental agenda in a stalemate.

more
http://motherboard.vice.com/read/meet-the-most-anti-science-congress-in-modern-history

2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Most Anti-Science Congress in Recent History Is Now in Session (Original Post) n2doc Jan 2015 OP
I'd like to see how anti-science these sons-a-bitches would be if they had to have Robotic surgery.. BlueJazz Jan 2015 #1
and the senate is going to vote on whether or not global warming is real pokerfan Jan 2015 #2
 

BlueJazz

(25,348 posts)
1. I'd like to see how anti-science these sons-a-bitches would be if they had to have Robotic surgery..
Thu Jan 15, 2015, 05:41 PM
Jan 2015

...to save their life. Yeah...You phony pieces of Shit.

pokerfan

(27,677 posts)
2. and the senate is going to vote on whether or not global warming is real
Thu Jan 15, 2015, 11:08 PM
Jan 2015

Next I expect them to tackle Copernican theory.

It's true. Elections have consequence.

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Science»The Most Anti-Science Con...