Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

steve2470

(37,457 posts)
Sat Jul 25, 2015, 02:31 PM Jul 2015

Top NASA boffin: It's time to make Pluto a proper planet again

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2015/07/24/pluto_planet_nasa/

Supporters of Pluto's readmission into the Solar System as a full-blown planet got a boost from NASA's planetary scientists on Friday.

"It's very hard not to call an object with this level of complexity in its geology, and such complex seasons, a planet," said Alan Stern, New Horizons principal investigator at Southwest Research Institute, during press conference about the Pluto probe's latest update.

"Astronomers and planetary scientists differ on this question but that's how science works – scientists make individual decisions and consensus is reached. I think we're going through a period of transition at the moment."

Data from the New Horizons space probe has shown Pluto to be geologically active, with new glacier plains of nitrogen ice carving out new surface features and eroding away impact craters from meteor strikes.
10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Top NASA boffin: It's time to make Pluto a proper planet again (Original Post) steve2470 Jul 2015 OP
Ha! I told you so! dixiegrrrrl Jul 2015 #1
This message was self-deleted by its author Warren DeMontague Jul 2015 #2
That's where I am going. gvstn Jul 2015 #3
Plus Ceres. It also used to be a planet. MillennialDem Jul 2015 #6
This message was self-deleted by its author Warren DeMontague Jul 2015 #7
Ceres falls under the dwarf planet classification MillennialDem Jul 2015 #8
How about simply adding "or Pluto" to the definition of a planet? Silent3 Jul 2015 #4
This message was self-deleted by its author Warren DeMontague Jul 2015 #5
That was way too serious a response to a deliberately silly post. Silent3 Jul 2015 #9
This message was self-deleted by its author Warren DeMontague Jul 2015 #10

dixiegrrrrl

(60,010 posts)
1. Ha! I told you so!
Sat Jul 25, 2015, 02:59 PM
Jul 2015

Glad they are seeing the error of their ways.
Cosmic vengeance may be averted for their mistake, I have been told by reliable sources.
so there!

Response to steve2470 (Original post)

gvstn

(2,805 posts)
3. That's where I am going.
Sun Jul 26, 2015, 05:03 AM
Jul 2015

It is the fact that Pluto's orbit is not on the same plane as all the "other" planets. It just appears to be something else than a planet. There is just no way around the fact that it is not orbiting the sun the same way as the planets.

Response to MillennialDem (Reply #6)

Silent3

(15,265 posts)
4. How about simply adding "or Pluto" to the definition of a planet?
Sun Jul 26, 2015, 05:18 AM
Jul 2015

Grandfather Pluto into the definition, make it an "honorary" planet... whatever.

A planet needs to be at least some particular size, mass, etc.
A planet has to clear its orbit.
A planet's orbit shouldn't be highly eccentric.
A planet's orbit should be within so many degrees of inclination from the ecliptic.

...Or a planet should be Pluto.

Response to Silent3 (Reply #4)

Response to Silent3 (Reply #9)

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Science»Top NASA boffin: It's tim...