Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

progressoid

(49,991 posts)
Thu Sep 8, 2016, 06:37 PM Sep 2016

DNA reveals that giraffes are four species — not one

One of the most iconic animals in Africa has a secret. A genetic analysis suggests that the giraffe is not one species, but 4 separate ones — a finding that could alter how conservationists protect these animals.

Researchers previously split giraffes into several subspecies on the basis of their coat patterns and where they lived. Closer inspection of their genes, however, reveals that giraffes should actually be divided into four distinct lineages that don’t interbreed in the wild, researchers report on 8 September in Current Biology1. Previous genetic studies2 have suggested that there were discrete giraffe populations that rarely intermingled, but this is the first to detect species-level differences, says Axel Janke, a geneticist at Goethe University in Frankfurt, Germany, and the study’s senior author.

“It was an amazing finding,” he says. He notes that giraffes are highly mobile, wide-ranging animals that would have many chances to interbreed in the wild if they were so inclined: “The million-dollar question is what kept them apart in the past.” Janke speculates that rivers or other physical barriers kept populations separate long enough for new species to arise.



The researchers suggest replacing the current species name, Giraffa camelopardalis, with four new ones:

the southern giraffe (G. giraffa), found mainly in South Africa, Namibia and Botswana;

the Masai giraffe (G. tippelskirchi) of Tanzania, Kenya and Zambia;

the reticulated giraffe (G. reticulata) found mainly in Kenya, Somalia and southern Ethiopia;

and the northern giraffe (G. camelopardalis), found in scattered groups in the central and eastern parts of the continent.

The one remaining subspecies is the Nubian giraffe (G. camelopardalis camelopardalis) of Ethiopia and South Sudan. It is a distinct subspecies of the northern giraffe.
14 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
DNA reveals that giraffes are four species — not one (Original Post) progressoid Sep 2016 OP
Love, love, love these creatures. nt Laffy Kat Sep 2016 #1
Me, too! narnian60 Sep 2016 #3
I saw one at Pete's Pond a couple of days ago. I was really excited. anamandujano Sep 2016 #2
What a tremendous site. So glad you shared it. Thank you. n/t Judi Lynn Sep 2016 #6
... BlancheSplanchnik Sep 2016 #11
Interesting-- who would have thought?? ailsagirl Sep 2016 #4
Not convinced bjvom Sep 2016 #5
"Lumpers vs. Splitters" arguments are old, and not just in biology. hunter Sep 2016 #8
Thanks -- this is the best post ever. BlancheSplanchnik Sep 2016 #10
Haha! Iggo Sep 2016 #14
Good for those involved in this discovery. So interesting. n/t Judi Lynn Sep 2016 #7
paradise herbivores? the girls only like their patterns. pansypoo53219 Sep 2016 #9
Jerry Coyne says "not so fast!" Towlie Sep 2016 #12
I used to love to go see the Giraffes at our Zoo but one of them yuiyoshida Sep 2016 #13

anamandujano

(7,004 posts)
2. I saw one at Pete's Pond a couple of days ago. I was really excited.
Thu Sep 8, 2016, 06:53 PM
Sep 2016
http://www.wildearth.tv/cam/petes-pond

[IMG][/IMG]

[IMG][/IMG]

In the first photo you can see two warthogs in the background leaving the pond.

In the second photo the giraffe is heading to a thicket where it stayed a long time eating. A little monkey was also there chowing down.
 

bjvom

(51 posts)
5. Not convinced
Thu Sep 8, 2016, 09:50 PM
Sep 2016

I have little faith in the scientific community's ability to reach a consensus on the definition of species much less the rules that govern what constitutes individual species, phylum class, order, genus, family . By the current accepted thinking, the mere fact that they don't interbreed in the wild is irrelevant to speciation. When it has been demonstrated that these (presumed) separate species are incapable of breeding , then will they be able with certainty to call them separate species. If G. tippelskirchi and G. camelopardalis are capable of producing non-sterile male offspring, they are not separate species. If they only produce a fertile female, then they are separate species.
If, on the other hand it turns out they can interbreed but something in their genomes prevents them from doing so then I believe we will have to change our definition of species.

hunter

(38,317 posts)
8. "Lumpers vs. Splitters" arguments are old, and not just in biology.
Fri Sep 9, 2016, 01:09 PM
Sep 2016
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lumpers_and_splitters

In biology lumpers are the darlings of developers.

Killing off a minor sub-species doesn't seem so tragic as killing off an entire species.

Religious creationists (often developers themselves) may also believe that fewer animals on Noah's ark somehow makes their bizarre literal interpretation of the story less absurd.

If the definition of "species" seems important, it's probably because high school biology textbooks in the U.S.A. are about as rotten as our history textbooks, edited to appease know-nothing school board members who remember only two giraffes poking their heads out of Noah's ark in their Sunday school coloring books.

The nomenclature system of Carl Linnaeus was later essential to our understanding of evolutionary biology, but it's not definitive. As we continue to explore the actual genes of various organisms, and the various populations of organisms, many surprising things turn up, and any definitions of "species" are increasingly shifted into the realm of population biology and away from morphology.

Most biologists I've met don't get hung up on the definition of "species," focusing instead on populations of organisms and their overall genetic diversity.

Genetic diversity in a sexually reproducing population is what makes a species resilient, especially in a rapidly changing environment.

Here in the anthropocene, maintaining the genetic diversity of endangered populations is extremely important.

BlancheSplanchnik

(20,219 posts)
10. Thanks -- this is the best post ever.
Sat Sep 10, 2016, 01:32 AM
Sep 2016

I have a little knowledge of biology; I interpret many different classes for Deaf and hearing clients, so I get exposed to some advanced classes.

Anyway, I'm reading your post, going "Yes!! Dammit, How can we make this happen? We CANT continue to let human populations expand infinitely....not if we value what we have-- The most beautiful array of diverse nature.

Today, a truck passed by me (in some slow traffic), and I saw his license plate: WILDRNESS.

Today, President Obama ordered work stop immediately on the Dakota Pipeline going through Standing Rock, SD.

Today, Native Protectors marched to the Capital and were greeted by police. Women led the people, and police lined up courteously!!!!!
And a reception line, of greeting and handshaking, happened

I think there's powerful medicine there. (If I may use a Native American trope.)

yuiyoshida

(41,832 posts)
13. I used to love to go see the Giraffes at our Zoo but one of them
Mon Sep 12, 2016, 10:19 AM
Sep 2016

had a crooked neck, at the Santa Barbara Zoo, and that used to bother me, that looked painful to me, but they said, it was just fine, and he deals with it very well.

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Science»DNA reveals that giraffes...