Science
Related: About this forumSometimes Science Is Wrong
Opinion:
Research is a self-correcting process, but that fact is often lost on the public
December 31, 2021
In 1996 scientists announced the astonishing news that theyd discovered what they believed might be signs of ancient life inside a meteorite from Mars. In 2014 astrophysicists declared that theyd found direct evidence at last for the inflationary universe theory, first proposed in the 1980s.
What these assertions had in common was that they were based on research by highly qualified, credentialed scientistsand also that the "discoveries" turned out to be wrong. Today essentially nobody thinks the meteorite contained persuasive evidence that it once harbored life, or that the astrophysicists had found anything more exciting than dust in the Milky Way.
This sort of backtracking isnt unusual. In part, it happens because scientists almost always have to revise cutting-edge research, or even retract it, as the scientific community tries to replicate it and fails, or as more and better evidence comes in.
The problem science journalists face is that this process is fundamentally at odds with how news coverage works, and that this can be confusing to readers. In most areaspolitics, international relations, business, sportsthe newest thing journalists report is almost always the most definitive. The Supreme Court heard arguments on Mississippis challenge to Roe v. Wade; pitcher Max Scherzer signed a three-year, $130-million contract with the Mets; Facebook rebranded its parent company as Meta. All of these are indisputably true. And when the court issues its ruling next year, or if Scherzer is injured and cant play; or if Facebook re-rebrands itself, that wont make these stories incorrect; theyll just be out-of-date.
More:
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/sometimes-science-is-wrong/
Walleye
(31,022 posts)Response to Judi Lynn (Original post)
abqtommy This message was self-deleted by its author.
abqtommy
(14,118 posts)thing often do not agree. The two words "peer review" are very important in scientific
research and findings. Meanwhile, it's easy for all of us to find exactly the science that
supports what we think since science is really the process of trial and error.