2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumDoes the Clinton campaign actually think Chelsea is a draw for millennials?
Do they think that young people struggling with student debt will identify with her? Seems out of touch to me.
FreakinDJ
(17,644 posts)reformist2
(9,841 posts)Now that the illusion has been shattered, there's nothing there.
Nyan
(1,192 posts)It was never about inevitability, but creating an illusion of inevitability. That's why the "pundits" wouldn't STFU about presumptive inevitable frontrunner that we're bleeding form our ears.
But really, they have little choice.
The alternative is to keep her in the background. Maybe she's the sort of entitled, petulant brat who wouldn't think twice about undercutting her mother, if not given some camera time.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)Last edited Wed Jan 13, 2016, 12:17 AM - Edit history (1)
her mother,"
What the hell is your basis for this? Seriously trashy, after the crap that kid endured from Republicans growing up in the WH.
This shit is just as trashy. You must be proud.
bvf
(6,604 posts)use them correctly. Otherwise, it makes you look ignorant.
If you haven't noticed, she's not a kid any more. Now that she's speaking for her mom, she's officially in politics.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)this is pretty much blind hate. Ugly, is what it is. You don;t get that this is every bit as ugly as people going after Bernie's family or "hippie" roots? It is exactly as ugly- and has no basis in reality.
bvf
(6,604 posts)and apologize. Then we can talk, but before that, you're SOL.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)so what exactly was it based on in terms of Chelsea's past behavior?
Calista241
(5,586 posts)and her first job was as a management consultant for a prominent consulting firm, and made over $200K. Consultants usually have some kind of, you know, job history and credibility that they're providing to clients.
And after that miracle opportunity, she went to do puff pieces for NBC, and made over $600k a year?
I mean, i understand that she's a President's daughter, and she has capitalized on her name just like the Bush's and probably the Obamas will in the future. But still, i'm her age, and graduating into a $200k job that she knew absolutely nothing about just rubs me the wrong way.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)was completely fabricated on your part- and only bitterness that she makes a great salary? Okay.
So that was bizarre and unfounded speculation that is completely out of character with her public behavior so far, got it.
litlbilly
(2,227 posts)bettyellen
(47,209 posts)Seriously?
litlbilly
(2,227 posts)Bernie's health care plan and she needs to be called out on that. If she, or you for that matter, can't take the heat, turn off
space heater.
enid602
(8,620 posts)So, Bernie's connection to the private sector consists of the odd carpentry job in Northern Vermont during the early '70's, between unemployment stints. What's your point?
bvf
(6,604 posts)And you should probably pay closer attention when responding. You seem a mite confused right now.
Response to bvf (Reply #36)
Post removed
bvf
(6,604 posts)You clearly don't focus when responding.
Thanks for the good wishes, although seeing how your attention appears to wander, I suspect you probably thought you were talking to someone else.
We can talk more after you apologize for misquoting me.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)that was unclear about what you said. Keep playing the game though, cute.
one_voice
(20,043 posts)just wanted to say I think that was a bullshit hide.
fleur-de-lisa
(14,627 posts)And I'm a Bernie supporter.
bvf
(6,604 posts)You still owe me an apology though. Perhaps in another thread.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)endured threats and personal attacs, in my case, threats of death as I'm sure others did NOW she emerges to tell us we don't have the right to the same HC SHE has.
She is a fully grown woman. Stop treating her as if she were a child. If ANYONE should be fighting for the same HC she and her parents have, and Congress has, and all the other elites who want to DENY the rest of us plebs, it should be Chelsea.
So sad to see her joining the Repubs who as you say, she certainly knows well, AGAINST those of us who stood up for HER.
Rush Limbaugh and she on the same page re our right to HC for all? Who would have thought?
This will most definitely backfire.
Whoever is being paid to run this campaign should be fired. Well, I would fire them. But then I support the person who supports ME and MY family who don't have the kind of privileges Chelsea has.
Bjornsdotter
(6,123 posts)I'm the mom of two millennials...both are for Bernie.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)winter is coming
(11,785 posts)Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)Antarctica seems a little chilly.
LibDemAlways
(15,139 posts)They are new college grads struggling to find good jobs and pay back loans. No way can they identify with an entitled President's daughter who is married to a millionaire hedge fund manager.
Kalidurga
(14,177 posts)My guess is she is more of a draw for establishment Democrats over 55.
Oilwellian
(12,647 posts)"Bernie Sanders wants to end Medicare" is a typical scare tactic right-wingers have used on senior citizens. That makes her lie all the more despicable and that's why we're rightfully pissed about it.
Paulie
(8,462 posts)Not the same as millennials at all.
cali
(114,904 posts)bettyellen
(47,209 posts)cali
(114,904 posts)bettyellen
(47,209 posts)cali
(114,904 posts)accepted as the first year millenials were born in.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)cali
(114,904 posts)bettyellen
(47,209 posts)cali
(114,904 posts)<snip>
And Chelsea Clinton -- seen as an asset with younger voters and students -- will become a more prominent voice in the campaign as well. The former first daughter headlined a fundraiser with her mother Thursday in New York, will headline two more in Boston in January and plans to start traveling to early nominating states like Iowa and New Hampshire early in 2016.
<<snip>
http://www.cnn.com/2015/12/18/politics/hillary-clinton-young-voters-millennials/
Have some more.
snip
Chelsea Clinton is seen as an asset to the campaign, especially with younger voters and students. The former first daughter played a sizable role in her mother's failed 2008 campaign, regularly stumping for her mother in important primary and caucus states, usually at colleges and universities.
http://www.cnn.com/2015/12/15/politics/chelsea-clinton-hillary-clinton-campaign/
SheilaT
(23,156 posts)Apparently the designation of GenX has totally disappeared, and both GenX and actual Millennials have been subsumed under the term Millennial.
There really is an enormous difference between the two generations.
For those of you who have a bit of time on your hands, I recommend the book "Generations" by William Strauss and Neill Howe. It is absolutely transformational in understanding the nature of different generations, how they experience history, how they behave through their life cycle, and how they influence history. Please, please read it.
senz
(11,945 posts)SheilaT
(23,156 posts)Not a short book, but well worth taking the time to read.
senz
(11,945 posts)that Thom Hartmann and one of his guests were raving about a year or so ago: The Fourth Turning http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0767900464
Both of them do look like good reads. I see they also have a couple of books on the subject of millennials.
SheilaT
(23,156 posts)While I would strongly recommend reading "Generations" first, because it gives a wonderfully detailed overview of their entire theory, if you only read "The Fourth Turning" you'll still get a lot.
I've been plugging this book for years here on DU, and I'm yet to have anyone pipe up and say they've also read it. For me it was a transformational book. I am now very inclined to view a lot of things through that lens, and it has a profound affect on how I see lots of things.
Hope you read at least one of them.
senz
(11,945 posts)I love finding new lenses through which to understand life's complexities.
Thanks, Sheila.
senz
(11,945 posts)that Chelsea doesn't have. No I can't quite put my finger on it, but it's almost always present. Sort of an open, confident friendliness that is also strangely smooth and bland. They seem perfectly comfortable with and accepting of older people. I've often thought that it reflects well on their parents. I've also wondered if it arises partly from their immersion in electronic communication devices.
My generation, boomers, were far less friendly to older people. We may have been polite with them but we weren't really comfortable around them. We had a saying, "Don't trust anyone over 30." I can't imagine millennials saying that. We tended to rebel.
I have a sense that millennials may have developed the traits they're going to need as they face what I consider a rather horrible future that they had no hand in creating but that they will have to deal with.
I think they're a special generation, and "the fate of the earth" may well rest in their hands someday.
Doctor_J
(36,392 posts)join in with lies is unlikely to sway many voters.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)Last edited Wed Jan 13, 2016, 12:35 AM - Edit history (1)
For shame- right?
"The 35-year old esteemed philanthropist touched on ways to engage millennials to be passionate about bringing new ideas as well as technology and innovation to the poorest regions of the world, one of which is expanding the rights and opportunities offered to women and girls.
"I'm obsessed with middle school," Clinton admitted.
Clinton noted that girls in first through third grade are far better at math and science than boys their age, yet the trends start to reverse at around the fourth grade and continue to widen in middle school. She cited the reason for this is that girls around that age start to care more about their appearance, but mainly because teachers in middle school call on males more than females in science and math class."
http://www.msn.com/en-nz/news/other/chelsea-clintons-vision-for-global-health-and-millennial-engagement/ar-AAfaGeb
delrem
(9,688 posts)What kind of rabbit hole did I fall down, anyway?
It's not even amusing like in the Alice tales.
It's just disgusting shit and I want out!
Armstead
(47,803 posts)Is less than admirable.
And hopefully millenia will see through that schtick.
Uncle Joe
(58,370 posts)Clueless doesn't begin to describe it.
Thanks for the thread, cali.
artislife
(9,497 posts)She does not have the Big Dawg's talent. I felt slightly bad for her, she didn't seem authentic, stage ready and/ or practiced. I now know with conviction, she will never be elected president in the future.
Oh, what she said...so not cool.
notadmblnd
(23,720 posts)Which comes across as disingenuous to me. It sounds scripted and rehearsed. Badly rehearsed
senz
(11,945 posts)which is unfortunate. I have always felt a little sorry for Chelsea; I don't think she'd have chosen the life she's been given, even if it did turn out to be grandly posh and privileged. I get the sense that she has always been under someone's thumb psychologically. She never seemed to go out on her own and discover herself. Maybe she will someday.
notadmblnd
(23,720 posts)nervous habit?
senz
(11,945 posts)I'll bet their friends sense it.
My opinion of her mother, which has very low since the 2008 campaign, just dipped into new territory. It begins to make sense of the woman's war-mongering bent.
I hope, hope, hope we do not end up with her as president.
TexasMommaWithAHat
(3,212 posts)Most people don't, but it sure helps in politics, especially for someone trying to appeal to younger voters.
I suspect that she's a very nice young woman, but her on-camera persona is just plain dull.
artislife
(9,497 posts)She suspect she is very loving but not cut out for this political world.
Tommy2Tone
(1,307 posts)bettyellen
(47,209 posts)And suddenly next year, it'll be a *shock* the youth of America didn't vote again. LOL.
Tommy2Tone
(1,307 posts)bettyellen
(47,209 posts)I remember reading about six months ago that things like their Global Health initiative would fit in with millennials' interests. OMG- it was all a plot to "get them" , all this women's health care stuff! A plot I tell you!
litlbilly
(2,227 posts)roguevalley
(40,656 posts)DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)I win.
Douglas Carpenter
(20,226 posts)silvershadow
(10,336 posts)there is no cover story they can concoct that will can cover a runaway train. Her services, though admirable, will not make a dent.
That's exactly what they're thinking.
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)zentrum
(9,865 posts)And don't forget, she and husband recently bought a 10M condo in NYCafter first selling her old 4M dollar condo. That's more than a bundle of millennials will make in an entire lifetime.
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)She was in escrow for a while.
senz
(11,945 posts)you are so hilarious! Whenever it seemed like I was going to lapse into a bout of self-pity, my ex-husband would throw out a one-liner like that. Took care of the mood perfectly!
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)Peregrine Took
(7,415 posts)Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)fbc
(1,668 posts)Betty Karlson
(7,231 posts)They think we care about "someone we can relate to". Trotting out Chelsea is like that awkward tweet "why Hillary is like your Latin grandmother": tone-deaf and missing the mark by a mile.
It is about the issues.
Ichingcarpenter
(36,988 posts)Which would be a yes for hedge fund owners
There .... I fixed your headline
randome
(34,845 posts)Who said her primary goal is to attract millennials?
[hr][font color="blue"][center]TECT in the name of the Representative approves of this post.[/center][/font][hr]
cali
(114,904 posts)Beacool
(30,250 posts)as they do bashing fellow Democrats, this site would be a lot more civil, instead of the cesspool that it has become.
Nay
(12,051 posts)influence over which Democratic candidate becomes the nominee. We have no influence over which crazy pub candidate the crazy pub voters vote for. In fact, if we really show a bunch of public hate for a certain pub, you can bet that their addled voters will make sure to vote for that person.
Now, most Democrats on this site are happy to slam Republicans generally for being the idiots/assholes/crazies/fascists they are, but to most of us it's obvious and really doesn't need much discussion or reaction, since our 'energy' against pubs will have no effect of whether one of them is elected President or not. Our energy should be directed at electing the best Democratic candidate, and thus there will be, and should be, many discussions about what our Democratic candidates say, do, and write. Especially before the primaries.
As far as civility is concerned, I don't think that pointing out that Ms Clinton's sneaky health care statements slamming Bernie are incorrect is being uncivil. Her comments were incorrect by omission, a tactic that is a hallmark of politicians who wish to manipulate the emotions of their electorate rather than educate that electorate. Many, many democrats on this site and others have declared their discomfort with any Democratic nominee using this sort of tactic, but Ms Clinton does not seem to understand that. It's not surprising that many of us feel uneasy about her possible nomination and want to discuss it.
Beacool
(30,250 posts)By the same token that some of you have misgivings about Hillary, there are those of us who have misgivings about Sanders. I think that he's sincere in what he believes, but I also think that he won't be able to enact most of his plans if he were to become president. Obama used to talk about wanting to be transformational (remember when he said that Reagan had been transformational in ways that Clinton had not?). He's been a middle of the road president, who despite his moderate policies, has been viciously attacked and hindered by Congress. How is Sanders going to implement even a portion of his agenda when Congress is more conservative now than when Obama became president? To me Sanders is a one note candidate, I think that Hillary is far more rounded and would be a more effective president. I also have doubts about anyone starting his presidency at the age of 75. IMO that's too old. I felt the same about Biden. Hillary at 69 is also pushing the envelope, but at least she would be Reagan's same age and women live longer (her mother was still sharp until her early 90s).
We are all entitled to our opinions, but there's a way to express them that is polite and doesn't use RW talking points.
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)They've probably already lined up to see who can be on the impeachment hearings.
Beacool
(30,250 posts)Just as she did in her years in the Senate. I think that Sanders is more dogmatic. Congress will never approve the 18 trillion dollars in new spending that he calculates he would need to implement his proposals.
"Sanders spending plan would require an estimated $15 trillion for a government-run, universal healthcare system. Tens of billions more would be spent on infrastructure, a Social Security expansion and free tuition at public colleges. One of the demands of my campaign is that we think big and not small, Sanders recently said in a speech to the Democratic National Committee."
http://www.alan.com/2015/09/15/report-sanders-wants-18-trillion-in-new-spending/#
If Obama had trouble getting his modest, by comparison, agenda passed when Democrats held both Houses of Congress. How would Sanders ever get anything from a very conservative House and a Republican Senate?
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)Beacool
(30,250 posts)The original article was from the WSJ.
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)Metric System
(6,048 posts)HassleCat
(6,409 posts)Most people are attracted to others who they perceive to be like themselves. Chelsea Clinton grew up as the new millennium was turning over, so she can talk the talk. She has some celebrity status, which goes a long way in the age of TV and People Magazine.
Ferd Berfel
(3,687 posts)All millennials have to fawn over Princess Chelsea
Yupy
(154 posts)silenttigersong
(957 posts)are" Dead Broke"in comparrison of who they like to roll with