Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
94 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Does the Clinton campaign actually think Chelsea is a draw for millennials? (Original Post) cali Jan 2016 OP
Everything HRC's campaign does it out of touch FreakinDJ Jan 2016 #1
I think their only plan was to create the illusion of inevitability, with endorsements and big $$$$. reformist2 Jan 2016 #34
That's right. Nyan Jan 2016 #54
They must. bvf Jan 2016 #2
"maybe she's the sort of entitled, petulant brat who wouldn't think twice about undercutting ... bettyellen Jan 2016 #12
If you're going to use quote marks, bvf Jan 2016 #14
If you're going to slam Chelsea- maybe back it up with ANY evidence? Because right now- bettyellen Jan 2016 #16
Fix your deliberate misquote of what I said bvf Jan 2016 #18
your speculation that she is entitled, petulant brat is clarified.... bettyellen Jan 2016 #21
How about how she graduated from Stanford Calista241 Jan 2016 #26
so- no evidence of petulance or not thinking twice about undercutting her mother? Thought that bettyellen Jan 2016 #29
How about lying about Bernie's health care plan? that puts her in the game, sorry... litlbilly Jan 2016 #35
it has nothing to do with the statement about Chelsea- so you defend that lie? bettyellen Jan 2016 #37
People are entitled to their opinion and I believe that's what that was. She still lied about litlbilly Jan 2016 #39
different strokes. . . enid602 Jan 2016 #51
Half way there. You still need to apologize. bvf Jan 2016 #36
Post removed Post removed Jan 2016 #41
I'm embarrassed for *you.* bvf Jan 2016 #43
you made shitty and unfounded speculations about Chelsea Clinton....there was nothing in my post bettyellen Jan 2016 #45
I know you can't respond, one_voice Jan 2016 #47
I think it was a bogus hide too . . . fleur-de-lisa Jan 2016 #86
Not since you went back and edited it. bvf Jan 2016 #49
And we defended her fiercely, all us common people who DON'T have the HC she has, we fought and sabrina 1 Jan 2016 #59
I never thought of that Bjornsdotter Jan 2016 #3
probably. Warren DeMontague Jan 2016 #4
Possibly. All it really does is emphasize how out of touch the Clintons are with the 99%. n/t winter is coming Jan 2016 #5
"Seems out of touch" Scootaloo Jan 2016 #6
My 22-year-old daughter and her friends are Feelin the Bern. LibDemAlways Jan 2016 #7
It appears that they do Kalidurga Jan 2016 #8
Chelsea's lie was directed toward that demographic Oilwellian Jan 2016 #71
Chelsea is a GenXer Paulie Jan 2016 #9
Right, born before 1982, but the campaign is using her to appeal to millennials cali Jan 2016 #10
Link please? bettyellen Jan 2016 #17
It's right in wiki cali Jan 2016 #19
LOL @ Wiki sourcing. chelsea and clinton both "not found" in article. tks for nothing! bettyellen Jan 2016 #22
Huh.? What are you going on about. All I claimed is that 1982 is generally cali Jan 2016 #24
"her campaign is using her to appeal to millennials" - Cilly claim. bettyellen Jan 2016 #25
That is self-evident. cali Jan 2016 #27
Ahh, you made it up. Newsflash for you Cilly- every Dem is hoping to court the millennials. bettyellen Jan 2016 #30
Nope, botty. Here you go cali Jan 2016 #69
Yep. She's not a Millenial. SheilaT Jan 2016 #44
Thank you, that sounds very interesting. senz Jan 2016 #57
It is incredibly interesting. SheilaT Jan 2016 #60
I looked it up on Amazon and also found another book by the same authors senz Jan 2016 #61
Yep. Equally good. SheilaT Jan 2016 #64
Great, now I really want to. senz Jan 2016 #66
I'm glad you said that, because there is something distinct about millennials senz Jan 2016 #55
most Sanders supporters dislike Hillary because of her constant lying. having her rich daughter Doctor_J Jan 2016 #11
Is that from Breibart - or the Global Health summit she spoke at last year? The nerve of her!! bettyellen Jan 2016 #13
Chelsea Clinton is an "esteemed philanthropist"? delrem Jan 2016 #62
I have no problem with that...BUT sending out with lies... Armstead Jan 2016 #15
Hillary thinks a young face will draw young voters, instead of the message. Uncle Joe Jan 2016 #20
Lets just talk about how Chelsea stumped. artislife Jan 2016 #23
I thought her cadence resembled her mother's notadmblnd Jan 2016 #42
Yes, I thought she'd picked up her mother's vocal tones too senz Jan 2016 #56
You may be right. I noticed that she bites her nails down to the quick notadmblnd Jan 2016 #68
This is sad. senz Jan 2016 #74
No, she has no "stage personality" - that's for sure TexasMommaWithAHat Jan 2016 #77
I agree. artislife Jan 2016 #80
It's not ratings here. Millennials will not elect the next president. Tommy2Tone Jan 2016 #28
Every Dem wishes they would get off their asses, but the young rarely do. bettyellen Jan 2016 #31
Exactly Tommy2Tone Jan 2016 #32
Every report everywhere is about appealing to the Millenials- they are bigger than Boomers,blah blah bettyellen Jan 2016 #33
Where do you people come from. Do you all hudle together and come up with this shit? litlbilly Jan 2016 #38
they do. roguevalley Jan 2016 #53
Wanna bet? The largest state in the union will be voting for full legalization of marijuana. DisgustipatedinCA Jan 2016 #81
about as much a draw as Debbie Wasserman-Schultz or Marie Antoinette Douglas Carpenter Jan 2016 #40
They were actually hoping she could be part of the cover story. Unfortunately for them, silvershadow Jan 2016 #46
Yup. zentrum Jan 2016 #48
Betcha Chelsea has a pair of shoes that cost more than some millennials make in a month. Spitfire of ATJ Jan 2016 #52
Many pairs. zentrum Jan 2016 #65
She understands the plight of the homeless.... Spitfire of ATJ Jan 2016 #67
LOL senz Jan 2016 #73
;-) Spitfire of ATJ Jan 2016 #78
I can just see Chelsea and her BFF, Ivanka, shopping at Neiman's now.....n/t Peregrine Took Jan 2016 #79
They'd go to Barneys. Spitfire of ATJ Jan 2016 #82
For some reason they think Lena Dunham is, so maybe? fbc Jan 2016 #50
Chelsea, like the rest of the Clinton campaign, is out of touch. Betty Karlson Jan 2016 #58
Does the Clinton campaign actually think Chelsea is a draw for millionaires? Ichingcarpenter Jan 2016 #63
Huh? You have a problem with Chelsea campaigning for her mother? randome Jan 2016 #70
No. I have no problem with that. cali Jan 2016 #72
If a portion of Sanders' supporters spent as much energy going after Republicans Beacool Jan 2016 #75
I can only speak for myself, of course, but Democrats really only have Nay Jan 2016 #84
I was referring to the general tone of this board. Beacool Jan 2016 #85
Do you honestly believe the Republicans are going to work with the Clintons? Spitfire of ATJ Jan 2016 #88
I think that Hillary is a pragmatist and would work hard to find common ground. Beacool Jan 2016 #90
You DO know that figure has been debunked. Right? Spitfire of ATJ Jan 2016 #91
No, I didn't. Beacool Jan 2016 #93
And that didn't raise any red flags for you? Spitfire of ATJ Jan 2016 #94
+1000 Metric System Jan 2016 #89
She probably is HassleCat Jan 2016 #76
But Sh's the Royal Princess Ferd Berfel Jan 2016 #83
They are desperate...Clintons even daughter can't bring younger voters, because they know better! Yupy Jan 2016 #87
The Clintons silenttigersong Jan 2016 #92

reformist2

(9,841 posts)
34. I think their only plan was to create the illusion of inevitability, with endorsements and big $$$$.
Wed Jan 13, 2016, 12:55 AM
Jan 2016

Now that the illusion has been shattered, there's nothing there.

Nyan

(1,192 posts)
54. That's right.
Wed Jan 13, 2016, 02:03 AM
Jan 2016

It was never about inevitability, but creating an illusion of inevitability. That's why the "pundits" wouldn't STFU about presumptive inevitable frontrunner that we're bleeding form our ears.

 

bvf

(6,604 posts)
2. They must.
Tue Jan 12, 2016, 11:09 PM
Jan 2016

But really, they have little choice.

The alternative is to keep her in the background. Maybe she's the sort of entitled, petulant brat who wouldn't think twice about undercutting her mother, if not given some camera time.

 

bettyellen

(47,209 posts)
12. "maybe she's the sort of entitled, petulant brat who wouldn't think twice about undercutting ...
Tue Jan 12, 2016, 11:42 PM
Jan 2016

Last edited Wed Jan 13, 2016, 12:17 AM - Edit history (1)

her mother,"


What the hell is your basis for this? Seriously trashy, after the crap that kid endured from Republicans growing up in the WH.
This shit is just as trashy. You must be proud.

 

bvf

(6,604 posts)
14. If you're going to use quote marks,
Tue Jan 12, 2016, 11:54 PM
Jan 2016

use them correctly. Otherwise, it makes you look ignorant.

If you haven't noticed, she's not a kid any more. Now that she's speaking for her mom, she's officially in politics.

 

bettyellen

(47,209 posts)
16. If you're going to slam Chelsea- maybe back it up with ANY evidence? Because right now-
Wed Jan 13, 2016, 12:08 AM
Jan 2016

this is pretty much blind hate. Ugly, is what it is. You don;t get that this is every bit as ugly as people going after Bernie's family or "hippie" roots? It is exactly as ugly- and has no basis in reality.

 

bvf

(6,604 posts)
18. Fix your deliberate misquote of what I said
Wed Jan 13, 2016, 12:13 AM
Jan 2016

and apologize. Then we can talk, but before that, you're SOL.

 

bettyellen

(47,209 posts)
21. your speculation that she is entitled, petulant brat is clarified....
Wed Jan 13, 2016, 12:18 AM
Jan 2016

so what exactly was it based on in terms of Chelsea's past behavior?

Calista241

(5,586 posts)
26. How about how she graduated from Stanford
Wed Jan 13, 2016, 12:36 AM
Jan 2016

and her first job was as a management consultant for a prominent consulting firm, and made over $200K. Consultants usually have some kind of, you know, job history and credibility that they're providing to clients.

And after that miracle opportunity, she went to do puff pieces for NBC, and made over $600k a year?

I mean, i understand that she's a President's daughter, and she has capitalized on her name just like the Bush's and probably the Obamas will in the future. But still, i'm her age, and graduating into a $200k job that she knew absolutely nothing about just rubs me the wrong way.

 

bettyellen

(47,209 posts)
29. so- no evidence of petulance or not thinking twice about undercutting her mother? Thought that
Wed Jan 13, 2016, 12:40 AM
Jan 2016

was completely fabricated on your part- and only bitterness that she makes a great salary? Okay.
So that was bizarre and unfounded speculation that is completely out of character with her public behavior so far, got it.

 

litlbilly

(2,227 posts)
39. People are entitled to their opinion and I believe that's what that was. She still lied about
Wed Jan 13, 2016, 01:06 AM
Jan 2016

Bernie's health care plan and she needs to be called out on that. If she, or you for that matter, can't take the heat, turn off
space heater.

enid602

(8,620 posts)
51. different strokes. . .
Wed Jan 13, 2016, 01:56 AM
Jan 2016

So, Bernie's connection to the private sector consists of the odd carpentry job in Northern Vermont during the early '70's, between unemployment stints. What's your point?

 

bvf

(6,604 posts)
36. Half way there. You still need to apologize.
Wed Jan 13, 2016, 01:01 AM
Jan 2016

And you should probably pay closer attention when responding. You seem a mite confused right now.

Response to bvf (Reply #36)

 

bvf

(6,604 posts)
43. I'm embarrassed for *you.*
Wed Jan 13, 2016, 01:17 AM
Jan 2016

You clearly don't focus when responding.

Thanks for the good wishes, although seeing how your attention appears to wander, I suspect you probably thought you were talking to someone else.

We can talk more after you apologize for misquoting me.

 

bettyellen

(47,209 posts)
45. you made shitty and unfounded speculations about Chelsea Clinton....there was nothing in my post
Wed Jan 13, 2016, 01:21 AM
Jan 2016

that was unclear about what you said. Keep playing the game though, cute.

 

bvf

(6,604 posts)
49. Not since you went back and edited it.
Wed Jan 13, 2016, 01:46 AM
Jan 2016

You still owe me an apology though. Perhaps in another thread.

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
59. And we defended her fiercely, all us common people who DON'T have the HC she has, we fought and
Wed Jan 13, 2016, 03:00 AM
Jan 2016

endured threats and personal attacs, in my case, threats of death as I'm sure others did NOW she emerges to tell us we don't have the right to the same HC SHE has.

She is a fully grown woman. Stop treating her as if she were a child. If ANYONE should be fighting for the same HC she and her parents have, and Congress has, and all the other elites who want to DENY the rest of us plebs, it should be Chelsea.

So sad to see her joining the Repubs who as you say, she certainly knows well, AGAINST those of us who stood up for HER.

Rush Limbaugh and she on the same page re our right to HC for all? Who would have thought?

This will most definitely backfire.

Whoever is being paid to run this campaign should be fired. Well, I would fire them. But then I support the person who supports ME and MY family who don't have the kind of privileges Chelsea has.

LibDemAlways

(15,139 posts)
7. My 22-year-old daughter and her friends are Feelin the Bern.
Tue Jan 12, 2016, 11:24 PM
Jan 2016

They are new college grads struggling to find good jobs and pay back loans. No way can they identify with an entitled President's daughter who is married to a millionaire hedge fund manager.

Oilwellian

(12,647 posts)
71. Chelsea's lie was directed toward that demographic
Wed Jan 13, 2016, 11:54 AM
Jan 2016

"Bernie Sanders wants to end Medicare" is a typical scare tactic right-wingers have used on senior citizens. That makes her lie all the more despicable and that's why we're rightfully pissed about it.

 

cali

(114,904 posts)
24. Huh.? What are you going on about. All I claimed is that 1982 is generally
Wed Jan 13, 2016, 12:33 AM
Jan 2016

accepted as the first year millenials were born in.

 

cali

(114,904 posts)
69. Nope, botty. Here you go
Wed Jan 13, 2016, 09:38 AM
Jan 2016

<snip>
And Chelsea Clinton -- seen as an asset with younger voters and students -- will become a more prominent voice in the campaign as well. The former first daughter headlined a fundraiser with her mother Thursday in New York, will headline two more in Boston in January and plans to start traveling to early nominating states like Iowa and New Hampshire early in 2016.

<<snip>
http://www.cnn.com/2015/12/18/politics/hillary-clinton-young-voters-millennials/

Have some more.

snip

Chelsea Clinton is seen as an asset to the campaign, especially with younger voters and students. The former first daughter played a sizable role in her mother's failed 2008 campaign, regularly stumping for her mother in important primary and caucus states, usually at colleges and universities.
http://www.cnn.com/2015/12/15/politics/chelsea-clinton-hillary-clinton-campaign/

 

SheilaT

(23,156 posts)
44. Yep. She's not a Millenial.
Wed Jan 13, 2016, 01:20 AM
Jan 2016

Apparently the designation of GenX has totally disappeared, and both GenX and actual Millennials have been subsumed under the term Millennial.

There really is an enormous difference between the two generations.

For those of you who have a bit of time on your hands, I recommend the book "Generations" by William Strauss and Neill Howe. It is absolutely transformational in understanding the nature of different generations, how they experience history, how they behave through their life cycle, and how they influence history. Please, please read it.

 

senz

(11,945 posts)
61. I looked it up on Amazon and also found another book by the same authors
Wed Jan 13, 2016, 03:47 AM
Jan 2016

that Thom Hartmann and one of his guests were raving about a year or so ago: The Fourth Turning http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0767900464

Both of them do look like good reads. I see they also have a couple of books on the subject of millennials.

 

SheilaT

(23,156 posts)
64. Yep. Equally good.
Wed Jan 13, 2016, 03:50 AM
Jan 2016

While I would strongly recommend reading "Generations" first, because it gives a wonderfully detailed overview of their entire theory, if you only read "The Fourth Turning" you'll still get a lot.

I've been plugging this book for years here on DU, and I'm yet to have anyone pipe up and say they've also read it. For me it was a transformational book. I am now very inclined to view a lot of things through that lens, and it has a profound affect on how I see lots of things.

Hope you read at least one of them.

 

senz

(11,945 posts)
66. Great, now I really want to.
Wed Jan 13, 2016, 03:56 AM
Jan 2016

I love finding new lenses through which to understand life's complexities.

Thanks, Sheila.

 

senz

(11,945 posts)
55. I'm glad you said that, because there is something distinct about millennials
Wed Jan 13, 2016, 02:23 AM
Jan 2016

that Chelsea doesn't have. No I can't quite put my finger on it, but it's almost always present. Sort of an open, confident friendliness that is also strangely smooth and bland. They seem perfectly comfortable with and accepting of older people. I've often thought that it reflects well on their parents. I've also wondered if it arises partly from their immersion in electronic communication devices.

My generation, boomers, were far less friendly to older people. We may have been polite with them but we weren't really comfortable around them. We had a saying, "Don't trust anyone over 30." I can't imagine millennials saying that. We tended to rebel.

I have a sense that millennials may have developed the traits they're going to need as they face what I consider a rather horrible future that they had no hand in creating but that they will have to deal with.

I think they're a special generation, and "the fate of the earth" may well rest in their hands someday.

 

Doctor_J

(36,392 posts)
11. most Sanders supporters dislike Hillary because of her constant lying. having her rich daughter
Tue Jan 12, 2016, 11:40 PM
Jan 2016

join in with lies is unlikely to sway many voters.

 

bettyellen

(47,209 posts)
13. Is that from Breibart - or the Global Health summit she spoke at last year? The nerve of her!!
Tue Jan 12, 2016, 11:47 PM
Jan 2016

Last edited Wed Jan 13, 2016, 12:35 AM - Edit history (1)

For shame- right?

"The 35-year old esteemed philanthropist touched on ways to engage millennials to be passionate about bringing new ideas as well as technology and innovation to the poorest regions of the world, one of which is expanding the rights and opportunities offered to women and girls.
"I'm obsessed with middle school," Clinton admitted.
Clinton noted that girls in first through third grade are far better at math and science than boys their age, yet the trends start to reverse at around the fourth grade and continue to widen in middle school. She cited the reason for this is that girls around that age start to care more about their appearance, but mainly because teachers in middle school call on males more than females in science and math class."



http://www.msn.com/en-nz/news/other/chelsea-clintons-vision-for-global-health-and-millennial-engagement/ar-AAfaGeb

delrem

(9,688 posts)
62. Chelsea Clinton is an "esteemed philanthropist"?
Wed Jan 13, 2016, 03:47 AM
Jan 2016

What kind of rabbit hole did I fall down, anyway?

It's not even amusing like in the Alice tales.

It's just disgusting shit and I want out!

 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
15. I have no problem with that...BUT sending out with lies...
Tue Jan 12, 2016, 11:58 PM
Jan 2016

Is less than admirable.

And hopefully millenia will see through that schtick.

Uncle Joe

(58,370 posts)
20. Hillary thinks a young face will draw young voters, instead of the message.
Wed Jan 13, 2016, 12:16 AM
Jan 2016

Clueless doesn't begin to describe it.

Thanks for the thread, cali.

 

artislife

(9,497 posts)
23. Lets just talk about how Chelsea stumped.
Wed Jan 13, 2016, 12:28 AM
Jan 2016

She does not have the Big Dawg's talent. I felt slightly bad for her, she didn't seem authentic, stage ready and/ or practiced. I now know with conviction, she will never be elected president in the future.

Oh, what she said...so not cool.

notadmblnd

(23,720 posts)
42. I thought her cadence resembled her mother's
Wed Jan 13, 2016, 01:12 AM
Jan 2016

Which comes across as disingenuous to me. It sounds scripted and rehearsed. Badly rehearsed

 

senz

(11,945 posts)
56. Yes, I thought she'd picked up her mother's vocal tones too
Wed Jan 13, 2016, 02:38 AM
Jan 2016

which is unfortunate. I have always felt a little sorry for Chelsea; I don't think she'd have chosen the life she's been given, even if it did turn out to be grandly posh and privileged. I get the sense that she has always been under someone's thumb psychologically. She never seemed to go out on her own and discover herself. Maybe she will someday.

 

senz

(11,945 posts)
74. This is sad.
Wed Jan 13, 2016, 01:59 PM
Jan 2016

I'll bet their friends sense it.

My opinion of her mother, which has very low since the 2008 campaign, just dipped into new territory. It begins to make sense of the woman's war-mongering bent.

I hope, hope, hope we do not end up with her as president.

TexasMommaWithAHat

(3,212 posts)
77. No, she has no "stage personality" - that's for sure
Wed Jan 13, 2016, 02:14 PM
Jan 2016

Most people don't, but it sure helps in politics, especially for someone trying to appeal to younger voters.

I suspect that she's a very nice young woman, but her on-camera persona is just plain dull.

 

bettyellen

(47,209 posts)
31. Every Dem wishes they would get off their asses, but the young rarely do.
Wed Jan 13, 2016, 12:43 AM
Jan 2016

And suddenly next year, it'll be a *shock* the youth of America didn't vote again. LOL.

 

bettyellen

(47,209 posts)
33. Every report everywhere is about appealing to the Millenials- they are bigger than Boomers,blah blah
Wed Jan 13, 2016, 12:52 AM
Jan 2016

I remember reading about six months ago that things like their Global Health initiative would fit in with millennials' interests. OMG- it was all a plot to "get them" , all this women's health care stuff! A plot I tell you!

 

silvershadow

(10,336 posts)
46. They were actually hoping she could be part of the cover story. Unfortunately for them,
Wed Jan 13, 2016, 01:24 AM
Jan 2016

there is no cover story they can concoct that will can cover a runaway train. Her services, though admirable, will not make a dent.

zentrum

(9,865 posts)
65. Many pairs.
Wed Jan 13, 2016, 03:56 AM
Jan 2016

And don't forget, she and husband recently bought a 10M condo in NYC—after first selling her old 4M dollar condo. That's more than a bundle of millennials will make in an entire lifetime.


 

senz

(11,945 posts)
73. LOL
Wed Jan 13, 2016, 01:51 PM
Jan 2016

you are so hilarious! Whenever it seemed like I was going to lapse into a bout of self-pity, my ex-husband would throw out a one-liner like that. Took care of the mood perfectly!

 

Betty Karlson

(7,231 posts)
58. Chelsea, like the rest of the Clinton campaign, is out of touch.
Wed Jan 13, 2016, 02:50 AM
Jan 2016

They think we care about "someone we can relate to". Trotting out Chelsea is like that awkward tweet "why Hillary is like your Latin grandmother": tone-deaf and missing the mark by a mile.

It is about the issues.

Ichingcarpenter

(36,988 posts)
63. Does the Clinton campaign actually think Chelsea is a draw for millionaires?
Wed Jan 13, 2016, 03:49 AM
Jan 2016

Which would be a yes for hedge fund owners




There .... I fixed your headline

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
70. Huh? You have a problem with Chelsea campaigning for her mother?
Wed Jan 13, 2016, 09:40 AM
Jan 2016

Who said her primary goal is to attract millennials?
[hr][font color="blue"][center]TECT in the name of the Representative approves of this post.[/center][/font][hr]

Beacool

(30,250 posts)
75. If a portion of Sanders' supporters spent as much energy going after Republicans
Wed Jan 13, 2016, 02:03 PM
Jan 2016

as they do bashing fellow Democrats, this site would be a lot more civil, instead of the cesspool that it has become.



Nay

(12,051 posts)
84. I can only speak for myself, of course, but Democrats really only have
Wed Jan 13, 2016, 03:16 PM
Jan 2016

influence over which Democratic candidate becomes the nominee. We have no influence over which crazy pub candidate the crazy pub voters vote for. In fact, if we really show a bunch of public hate for a certain pub, you can bet that their addled voters will make sure to vote for that person.

Now, most Democrats on this site are happy to slam Republicans generally for being the idiots/assholes/crazies/fascists they are, but to most of us it's obvious and really doesn't need much discussion or reaction, since our 'energy' against pubs will have no effect of whether one of them is elected President or not. Our energy should be directed at electing the best Democratic candidate, and thus there will be, and should be, many discussions about what our Democratic candidates say, do, and write. Especially before the primaries.

As far as civility is concerned, I don't think that pointing out that Ms Clinton's sneaky health care statements slamming Bernie are incorrect is being uncivil. Her comments were incorrect by omission, a tactic that is a hallmark of politicians who wish to manipulate the emotions of their electorate rather than educate that electorate. Many, many democrats on this site and others have declared their discomfort with any Democratic nominee using this sort of tactic, but Ms Clinton does not seem to understand that. It's not surprising that many of us feel uneasy about her possible nomination and want to discuss it.

Beacool

(30,250 posts)
85. I was referring to the general tone of this board.
Wed Jan 13, 2016, 03:31 PM
Jan 2016

By the same token that some of you have misgivings about Hillary, there are those of us who have misgivings about Sanders. I think that he's sincere in what he believes, but I also think that he won't be able to enact most of his plans if he were to become president. Obama used to talk about wanting to be transformational (remember when he said that Reagan had been transformational in ways that Clinton had not?). He's been a middle of the road president, who despite his moderate policies, has been viciously attacked and hindered by Congress. How is Sanders going to implement even a portion of his agenda when Congress is more conservative now than when Obama became president? To me Sanders is a one note candidate, I think that Hillary is far more rounded and would be a more effective president. I also have doubts about anyone starting his presidency at the age of 75. IMO that's too old. I felt the same about Biden. Hillary at 69 is also pushing the envelope, but at least she would be Reagan's same age and women live longer (her mother was still sharp until her early 90s).

We are all entitled to our opinions, but there's a way to express them that is polite and doesn't use RW talking points.

 

Spitfire of ATJ

(32,723 posts)
88. Do you honestly believe the Republicans are going to work with the Clintons?
Wed Jan 13, 2016, 08:07 PM
Jan 2016

They've probably already lined up to see who can be on the impeachment hearings.

Beacool

(30,250 posts)
90. I think that Hillary is a pragmatist and would work hard to find common ground.
Wed Jan 13, 2016, 08:37 PM
Jan 2016

Just as she did in her years in the Senate. I think that Sanders is more dogmatic. Congress will never approve the 18 trillion dollars in new spending that he calculates he would need to implement his proposals.

"Sanders’ spending plan would require an estimated $15 trillion for a government-run, universal healthcare system. Tens of billions more would be spent on infrastructure, a Social Security expansion and free tuition at public colleges. “One of the demands of my campaign is that we think big and not small,” Sanders recently said in a speech to the Democratic National Committee."

http://www.alan.com/2015/09/15/report-sanders-wants-18-trillion-in-new-spending/#

If Obama had trouble getting his modest, by comparison, agenda passed when Democrats held both Houses of Congress. How would Sanders ever get anything from a very conservative House and a Republican Senate?

 

HassleCat

(6,409 posts)
76. She probably is
Wed Jan 13, 2016, 02:08 PM
Jan 2016

Most people are attracted to others who they perceive to be like themselves. Chelsea Clinton grew up as the new millennium was turning over, so she can talk the talk. She has some celebrity status, which goes a long way in the age of TV and People Magazine.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Does the Clinton campaign...