2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumHillary Clinton’s shockingly blunt critique of President Obama
Buried deep within a 73-minute editorial board meeting on Monday with the Des Moines Register, Hillary Clinton offered a rare -- and blunt -- critique of President Obama, and a window into what she believes will allow her to be a more successful president than the man she once worked for.
Here's Clinton's answer to a question as to how -- and why -- she would be more successful than Obama in bringing bipartisanship to Washington.
Because I have much more experience doing it. When I went to the Senate, I cooperated with every Republican. ... I had much more of a running start of actually dealing with Republicans in Congress. ... I believe you have to do it. You have to build those relationships and constantly be looking for common ground no matter how small a sliver it may be. Theres a lot of room if you are actually trying to legislate and solve problems to find common ground. ... You have to be constantly preparing a story, preparing a path for members of Congress. ... This is the kind of constant care and feeding and working that you have to do if you are going to get any part of your agenda through. And I am prepared to do that.
<snip>
Fascinating, no? What Clinton is saying is that she could succeed in wooing Republicans (and Democrats) in Congress where Obama has failed because, well, she's done it before. That line of reasoning echoes the case Clinton unsuccessfully prosecuted against then-senator Obama in the 2008 Democratic presidential primary fight -- that he might talk a good game but that, ultimately, he lacked the know-how and temperament to work with an unfriendly Congress to get things done.
<snip>
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/01/12/hillary-clinton-just-offered-a-shockingly-blunt-critique-of-president-obama/
Segami
(14,923 posts)Hillary was asked who she considered to be her number one enemy?
Just more having it every which way Hillary.
This is the moment I was thinking of when I read the first line and stopped reading. She makes contradicting statements as if she's unaware of recording technology. No wonder her campaign loses Internet polls. Apparently they don't understand how it works!
morningfog
(18,115 posts)JRLeft
(7,010 posts)Motown_Johnny
(22,308 posts)Or was she lying?
Hmmm......
global1
(25,253 posts)Hillary as much or more than Obama. The gridlock in D.C. will not end with Hillary.
firebrand80
(2,760 posts)The GOP considers their Obama strategy successful, no reason to change it with a new President. I don't think personal feelings even factor into it.
I stopped reading after this line: "When I went to the Senate, I cooperated with every Republican." I'm sure she did. Enemy Number 1 in her words. Anyone wanna buy a Bridge?
Xipe Totec
(43,890 posts)Has never really been at all interested in playing ball with Congress on anything close to a level playing field...
What are these, zoo animals?
Give me a break.
Ichingcarpenter
(36,988 posts)Yes she did and against 30 democrats on banning cluster bombs
She voted against Democrats, and with every single republican for a weapon banned by 98% of the world.
2006................
http://progressive.org/clinton_should_have_u_s_sign_cluster_bomb_treaty.html
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2007/12/21/425303/-
Her bragging about that is like what Lewis Black said about Bill Clinton.
''I never thought that Bill Clinton should be the president. When he was running to be the president of the United States, he said on over a hundred occasions, he said the following: He said, 'One of the great accomplishments while I was the governor of Arkansas, was to take my state in education from 50th to 49th.' And I thought, ' you know, Bill, you should keep that a secret.'
Zorra
(27,670 posts)If we don't nominate Bernie, you can stick a fork in the US.
Punkingal
(9,522 posts)uponit7771
(90,347 posts)cali
(114,904 posts)uponit7771
(90,347 posts)cali
(114,904 posts)uponit7771
(90,347 posts)hedda_foil
(16,375 posts)uponit7771
(90,347 posts)DisgustipatedinCA
(12,530 posts)I don't know how to determine which of her words are true, and which are untrue. That's a FATAL flaw for those wanting my vote. But I'm aware my vote by itself is worth very little. What should be cause for much greater concern for her campaign is that millions of people think "liar" when they see her name.