2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumBernie responds to Chelsea . . . with far more grace and class than her scurrilous remarks deserved
http://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/2016/01/13/bernie-sanders-sotu-and-gun-issue-bash-intv.cnncali
(114,904 posts)markpkessinger
(8,401 posts). . . I predict this dishonest line of attack will backfire on Hillary -- big time.
Snotcicles
(9,089 posts)Le Taz Hot
(22,271 posts)once again he stays on message. EXACTLY where he needs to be -- it's one of the things that has carried him this far.
thereismore
(13,326 posts)olderthandirt
(11 posts)Right on my acid test for a politician is ( Would you want them as a neighbor ?) Bernie is the only politician In my lifetime that's met this criteria. VOTE FOR BERNIE OUR COUNTRY IS AT STAKE
thereismore
(13,326 posts)That takes me back to 2000.
guillaumeb
(42,641 posts)Channeling the inner Trump? Hardly the sign of a leader.
fredamae
(4,458 posts)a decades long history of speaking the truth. Good luck to Clintons trying to besmirch Bernies credibility.....They're doing themselves no favors.
But they Are representing their "special interests".....special interest....profits, imo
INdemo
(6,994 posts)Bernie hit that one out of the park/
So Hillary should tell us after 1.6 Million was spent on her United Healtcare proposal in the early 90's which failed to even come close to being approved with a Democratic Majority,she has the balls oops, make that guts, to even try and criticize with falsehoods Bernie Sander's desire to create a healthcare plan similar to Medicare for all?
fredamae
(4,458 posts)we won't/don't remember? I dunno, but This whole thing is in very poor taste. A really Bad political calculation-imo
INdemo
(6,994 posts)and I will bet that those undecided that we contact might just be leaning towards Bernie now.
Go Bernie !!
kath
(10,565 posts)Oilwellian
(12,647 posts)Thanks for posting.
emulatorloo
(44,133 posts)sonofspy777
(360 posts)ljm2002
(10,751 posts)...yep.
SoapBox
(18,791 posts)And Chelsea should be mad as hell, about whoever advised her to spew out that crap that she did.
Shame on that campaign.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)Was she telling the truth then, or now? What does she really think about anything? This is why when people are polled on trusting candidates, she scores so low.
As for Chelsea, she should have known better and for her mother's sake, should have refused to go out and lie for her, assuming it wasn't her own idea.
840high
(17,196 posts)shows she'll say anything for power. To me that's sick.
Douglas Carpenter
(20,226 posts)roguevalley
(40,656 posts)Sophiegirl
(2,338 posts)Excellent response without being snarky. But, then again, that is how he rolls.
hedgehog
(36,286 posts)Faux pas
(14,682 posts)Ferd Berfel
(3,687 posts)We need another FDR, NOT another Corporatist.
lastone
(588 posts)That their desire for power makes them lying dirtbags.
Duckfan
(1,268 posts)....is an example of desperation. Chelsea was saying this under stress knowing it was false just like a car thief gets questioned by police. Saying "I didn't do it" under stress--to avoid jail. It's a characteristic of linguistics/communications.
azmom
(5,208 posts)99Forever
(14,524 posts)And enough Clintons.
Apparently the lying is genetic and Chelsea got it from both sides.
kath
(10,565 posts)See Divernan's diary for some VERY enlightening posts on the Mezvinsky family: http://www.democraticunderground.com/~Divernan