Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
45 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I am proud to stand with Eric Holder and Hillary Clinton (Original Post) DemocratSinceBirth Jan 2016 OP
this is AT LEAST the third Eric Holder thread you've started today. kath Jan 2016 #1
Lloyd, Jamie and the gang agree FlatBaroque Jan 2016 #2
Yes. YAY!for Wall Street and all their shills. kath Jan 2016 #4
Why the need to be nasty? joshcryer Jan 2016 #6
See post #5 Scootaloo Jan 2016 #10
I can actually name the bankers that could've been prosecuted. joshcryer Jan 2016 #16
Well, yeah. jkbRN Jan 2016 #12
Except I think that Holder should've done it. joshcryer Jan 2016 #15
He set an unthinkable precedent by letting the bankers off jkbRN Jan 2016 #22
The settlement regime is not enough, of course. joshcryer Jan 2016 #29
This message was self-deleted by its author libdem4life Jan 2016 #19
I would be embarrassed. ChairmanAgnostic Jan 2016 #3
Me too jkbRN Jan 2016 #7
Why would I be embarrassed to stand with a man who did everything possible DemocratSinceBirth Jan 2016 #8
Why would I be embarrassed to stand next to a guy who ChairmanAgnostic Jan 2016 #17
Well, he had to keep himself busy with something jkbRN Jan 2016 #23
Interesting remarks from the man who as Attorney General guillaumeb Jan 2016 #5
Yep. That good old revolving door. n/t progressoid Jan 2016 #21
And guess what, I'm not. Just as relevant. highprincipleswork Jan 2016 #9
No surprise whatchamacallit Jan 2016 #11
+1 kath Jan 2016 #13
The rationale he gives is only in reference to her being better than any potential Rethug president. JudyM Jan 2016 #14
Eric Holder is a crook and an accomplice to some of the biggest WDIM Jan 2016 #18
This is at least... quickesst Jan 2016 #20
I am a huge supporter of his./nt DemocratSinceBirth Jan 2016 #24
He is a good man quickesst Jan 2016 #28
He is an excellent man, cut from the finest timber, if you will./nt DemocratSinceBirth Jan 2016 #32
I agree... quickesst Jan 2016 #33
A giant among men DemocratSinceBirth Jan 2016 #34
A few reasons... quickesst Jan 2016 #35
All I need to know is Bill O'Reilly hated him./nt DemocratSinceBirth Jan 2016 #36
Haha.... quickesst Jan 2016 #39
Oh, I thought this was a Goldman Sachs press release marmar Jan 2016 #25
I am proud to stand on the opposte side. far away from Eric Holder and Hillary Clinton Autumn Jan 2016 #26
What An Embarrassment cantbeserious Jan 2016 #27
I disagree TSIAS Jan 2016 #30
So the mouthpiece for the 1% is endorsing the candidate for the 1% Katashi_itto Jan 2016 #31
LOL, repeat posts on same topic and unneeded videos. Your typical day. Nt Logical Jan 2016 #37
Since empathy is part and parcel of liberalism... DemocratSinceBirth Jan 2016 #38
It gets old. One post per topic should work, just keep kicking it. Nt Logical Jan 2016 #40
It's not as if there are any Kants, Hegels, Rousseaus, or Hamiltons on this board... DemocratSinceBirth Jan 2016 #41
No idea what you mean by that. Nt Logical Jan 2016 #42
It's not as if my threads are crowding out greatness. DemocratSinceBirth Jan 2016 #43
Ah I get it now.. your OP is a joke jack_krass Jan 2016 #44
No...My posts are ersatz cleansing agents DemocratSinceBirth Jan 2016 #45

joshcryer

(62,276 posts)
6. Why the need to be nasty?
Wed Jan 13, 2016, 03:53 PM
Jan 2016

Is anyone who supports Holder a wall street "shill"? I happen to think he did OK. Especially in light of the total shit he had to put up with.

jkbRN

(850 posts)
12. Well, yeah.
Wed Jan 13, 2016, 03:57 PM
Jan 2016

If you support someone, that means you support his/her policies--most notably holders "too big to fail" banks, in which he coined that term, and did little to nothing to prosecute the criminals that caused the recession.

joshcryer

(62,276 posts)
15. Except I think that Holder should've done it.
Wed Jan 13, 2016, 04:07 PM
Jan 2016

Even though it would've gone on a decade, cost 100x as much as Enron, and most of the bankers would've got off anyway.

That he didn't waste time but instead went after settlements (in the robocalling case keeping tens of thousands of workers out of jail), doesn't bother me that much nor does it make me a shill.

But those who choose to call me one are nasty pieces of work.

jkbRN

(850 posts)
22. He set an unthinkable precedent by letting the bankers off
Wed Jan 13, 2016, 06:30 PM
Jan 2016

Also, when he left the Obama administration he went back to his corporate law firm:

If Las Vegas took bets on whether recently departed Attorney General Eric Holder would return to corporate law firm Covington & Burling, the casinos would have run out of money faster than Greek banks. Newborn infants could have guessed at a homecoming for the former partner at Covington from 2001 to 2009. Last year, Holder bought a condo 300 feet from the firm’s headquarters. The National Law Journal headlined the news, “Holder’s Return to Covington Was Six Years in the Making,” as if acting as the nation’s top law enforcement officer was a temp gig. They even kept an 11th-floor corner office empty for his return.


If we had a more aggressive media, this would be an enormous scandal, more than the decamping of former Obama Administration officials to places like Uber and Amazon. That’s because practically no law firm has done more to protect Wall Street executives from the consequences of their criminal activities than Covington & Burling. Their roster of clients includes every mega-bank in America: JPMorgan Chase, Wells Fargo, Citigroup, Bank of America. Yet Holder has joined several of his ex-employees there, creating a shadow Justice Department and an unquestionable conflict of interest. In fact, given the pathetic fashion in which DoJ limited punishment for those who caused the greatest economic meltdown in 80 years, Holder’s new job looks a lot like his old job.


It isn't necessarily what he did, but more of what he did not do--which is now setting us up for another crash. Maybe if he would have jailed them we wouldn't be on the brink of another financial crisis.

You can call it shilling, but what you are no doubt doing is propagating a man who (in the eyes of many) failed the American people.

Source: http://www.salon.com/2015/07/07/why_eric_holders_new_job_is_an_insult_to_the_american_public/

Sincerely,
A nasty piece of work (aka, a nurse)

joshcryer

(62,276 posts)
29. The settlement regime is not enough, of course.
Thu Jan 14, 2016, 12:09 AM
Jan 2016

But until Bush's judicial appointments are gone (retire) a lot of it will continue.

I simply don't buy the hyperbole about Holder. Remember when Wheeler was absolutely trashed for being a former lobbyist? Yet he brought us net neutrality. Now I'm sure he's done some shit since I might not like. But I think he's still good by me. I'm sure nasty shit can be alleged about me for that support. Corporate shill for the mega communications monopoly!

Response to joshcryer (Reply #6)

jkbRN

(850 posts)
7. Me too
Wed Jan 13, 2016, 03:54 PM
Jan 2016

this endorsement will definitely not help her with getting people to believe that she will "reign in Wall Street"

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,710 posts)
8. Why would I be embarrassed to stand with a man who did everything possible
Wed Jan 13, 2016, 03:54 PM
Jan 2016
I would be embarrassed.



Why would I be embarrassed to stand with a man who did everything possible to protect the right of minorities to vote and prosecute hate crimes?



http://cnsnews.com/news/article/melanie-hunter/holder-calls-updated-fair-housing-lending-laws
..."Under Holder, the Civil Rights Division has racked up the most hate crime convictions in more than a decade as the FBI and Civil Rights Division began actively investigating and prosecuting hate crimes based on sexual orientation and gender identity with the implementation of the Matthew Shepard and James Byrd, Jr. Hate Crimes Prevention Act.

And during a Lambda Legal reception in June, Holder took aim at the Boy Scouts of America’s remaining ban on gay Scout leaders, comparing it to “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” and describing it as “a relic of an age of prejudice and insufficient understanding.”

According to Chad Griffin, president of the Human Rights Campaign, Holder’s record is unmatched. “Some Attorneys General wait for history, others make history happen. Attorney General Holder made history for the LGBT community,” Griffin said in a statement. “He was our Robert F. Kennedy, lightening the burden of every American who faces legal discrimination and social oppression. We owe him a profound debt of gratitude for his legacy of advocacy and service.”

ChairmanAgnostic

(28,017 posts)
17. Why would I be embarrassed to stand next to a guy who
Wed Jan 13, 2016, 04:09 PM
Jan 2016

stood idly by while AIG and Wall ripped off America, then refused to prosecute despite clear indications of corruption and financial crimes? I dunno. I guess my standards are higher than yours.

jkbRN

(850 posts)
23. Well, he had to keep himself busy with something
Wed Jan 13, 2016, 06:44 PM
Jan 2016

When he wasn't prosecuting the banks--just like lynch with the FIFA scandal and giving the banks fines.

You really need to learn to read between the lines. They win when they distract the voters.

What’s most ludicrous about Lynch’ prosecuting FIFA officials for financial crimes is that she has, for much of her legal career, defended some of Wall Street's worst financial criminals. When she left Harvard, she took a job as a litigation assistant for Cahill Gordon & Reindel (CG&R) — the go-to law firm for New York’s financial crooks — from 1984 to 1990. CG&R attorneys represented some of the more notorious figures behind the savings and loan scandal of the 1980s and 1990s. The “securities litigation and white-collar criminal defense” section of CG&R’s website describes the type of clients the firm represents. Headliners include the bankers behind the $5 trillion-per-day LIBOR market scandal, which Lynch’s office recently slapped with a $6 billion fine, and the ratings agencies that knowingly rated doomed-to-fail mortgage-backed securities as AAA.

Lynch’s legal career is emblematic of the revolving door between Washington and Wall Street. After 11 years of working for the U.S. attorney’s office, Lynch took a job at Hogan & Hartson (now known as Hogan Lovells), working alongside John Roberts, now the chief justice of the United States. Lynch’s first case at Hogan was defending an Arthur Andersen partner who got caught cooking the books for Enron. From 2003 to 2005, she served on the board for the New York Federal Reserve, working directly under Tim Geithner, who became famous for turning a blind eye to Wall Street’s high-risk gambling schemes that led to the 2008 financial crisis. Lynch stayed at Hogan until President Barack Obama appointed her as U.S. attorney for the Eastern District of New York. No wonder Lynch hasn’t ever put a banker in jail during her legal career: They’re her former clients.

Should FIFA officials do jail time for their crimes? Of course. But football fans around the world following the FIFA investigation would be wise to hold off on praising Lynch as a paragon of justice even if she convicts them all. If the FIFA executives accused of financial crimes were Wall Street bankers, they would never have to worry about spending one day inside a prison cell.


Source: http://america.aljazeera.com/opinions/2015/6/fifa-indictments-reveal-loretta-lynchs-hypocrisy.html

guillaumeb

(42,641 posts)
5. Interesting remarks from the man who as Attorney General
Wed Jan 13, 2016, 03:52 PM
Jan 2016

refused to prosecute the banker thieves who nearly bankrupted the country, as well as the war criminals who conducted an illegal war and tortured people.

Good to know that Holder finally located his ethics.

What does Holder do now? Oh yes, I remember:


Why Eric Holder’s new job is an insult to the American public

The former Attorney General who made "too big to jail" a national joke now re-joins his old corporate law firm
Why Eric Holder’s new job is an insult to the American public

If Las Vegas took bets on whether recently departed Attorney General Eric Holder would return to corporate law firm Covington & Burling, the casinos would have run out of money faster than Greek banks. Newborn infants could have guessed at a homecoming for the former partner at Covington from 2001 to 2009. Last year, Holder bought a condo 300 feet from the firm’s headquarters. The National Law Journal headlined the news, “Holder’s Return to Covington Was Six Years in the Making,” as if acting as the nation’s top law enforcement officer was a temp gig. They even kept an 11th-floor corner office empty for his return.

If we had a more aggressive media, this would be an enormous scandal, more than the decamping of former Obama Administration officials to places like Uber and Amazon. That’s because practically no law firm has done more to protect Wall Street executives from the consequences of their criminal activities than Covington & Burling. Their roster of clients includes every mega-bank in America: JPMorgan Chase, Wells Fargo, Citigroup, Bank of America. Yet Holder has joined several of his ex-employees there, creating a shadow Justice Department and an unquestionable conflict of interest. In fact, given the pathetic fashion in which DoJ limited punishment for those who caused the greatest economic meltdown in 80 years, Holder’s new job looks a lot like his old job.


http://www.salon.com/2015/07/07/why_eric_holders_new_job_is_an_insult_to_the_american_public/

An older link, but still relevant. After serving the 1% as Attorney General he received his reward for his great work. For the 1%.

WDIM

(1,662 posts)
18. Eric Holder is a crook and an accomplice to some of the biggest
Wed Jan 13, 2016, 04:12 PM
Jan 2016

criminals in the world.

Thats not to mention the lives he destroyed because they used a peaceful plant.

quickesst

(6,280 posts)
28. He is a good man
Thu Jan 14, 2016, 12:08 AM
Jan 2016

Face it, if he had endorsed Bernie Sanders, he would be one of the greatest guys on earth according to many of Bernie's supporters, and if they said something stupid like, "No, I'm disappointed that he endorsed Bernie, and I've always felt this way about him", they would straight up be lying through their teeth. You gotta ask yourself, how can every single person, and organization that has, and let's face it, will endorse Hillary be the devil incarnate, including a grieving mother who has lost her child to out of control, overreaching injustice.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1251996809

This is what they have become. The sad part about it is, they are proud of it.😕

quickesst

(6,280 posts)
35. A few reasons...
Thu Jan 14, 2016, 11:45 AM
Jan 2016

...why the the negativity is ludicrous....and bizarre.

1. Revitalized the Civil Rights Division of the Justice Dept.

Holder has shifted the focus of this division back to racial discrimination. (Under the Bush administration, the focus was on religious discrimination and human trafficking.)

2. Defender of LGBTQ rights

Holder has been a powerful ally to the LGBTQ community over the years. “In recent years, and even in the last 12 months, our nation has made extraordinary strides to overcome obstacles and institutional biases that too often affect gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender individuals,” Holder said.

More here:
http://bluenationreview.com/eric-holders-greatest-achievements/

TSIAS

(14,689 posts)
30. I disagree
Thu Jan 14, 2016, 04:56 AM
Jan 2016

But I'm not going to rip into him. I think he's one of our best attorneys general.

I also think fellow Sanders supporters should refrain from insulting people who support the opposition.

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,710 posts)
38. Since empathy is part and parcel of liberalism...
Thu Jan 14, 2016, 12:22 PM
Jan 2016

Since empathy is part and parcel of liberalism if tearing others down makes you feel better about yourself then I won't stand in your way.

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,710 posts)
41. It's not as if there are any Kants, Hegels, Rousseaus, or Hamiltons on this board...
Thu Jan 14, 2016, 12:50 PM
Jan 2016

It's not as if there are any Kants, Hegels, Rousseaus, or Hamiltons on this board and my posts are blocking them out.

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,710 posts)
43. It's not as if my threads are crowding out greatness.
Thu Jan 14, 2016, 01:16 PM
Jan 2016

This board ceased long ago to be a venue to seriously discuss issues, if it ever did. Consequently I create different personas to make it enjoyable for me. This is just the latest iteration.

I am just , imho, inserting some levity.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»I am proud to stand with ...