2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumThere are those who look at things the way they are, and ask why...
... I dream of things that never were, and ask why not?" - Robert Kennedy
I'm with the candidate who dreams of things that never were and asks why not - the candidate who is inspiring us to ask the same question, and believes that we can do anything we dream is possible.
valerief
(53,235 posts)upgrade the U.S. to first world status for all its citizens!
Avalux
(35,015 posts)retrowire
(10,345 posts)pnwmom
(108,980 posts)and a House and Senate that are built to prevent radical, wholesale change.
roguevalley
(40,656 posts)we vote them out and it will happen. No one is happy with them now and they will feel the wrath. that's why the pug magazine came out swinging. Its too late for them. they have doomed themselves.
pnwmom
(108,980 posts)raising any money to help bring about a Democratic Congress. But even if he helps, only a third of the Senate is up for election every two years.
pnwmom
(108,980 posts)with the current Congress.
And only 1/3 of the Senate will come up for election 2 years later. The likelihood that they'll have less than 40 votes for filibuster is almost zero.
roguevalley
(40,656 posts)pnwmom
(108,980 posts)Ken Burch
(50,254 posts)Nobody ever said JUST electing Bernie would solve everything.
pnwmom
(108,980 posts)That's why we have an equal rights amendment now, because it's so easy.
Oh wait.
Ken Burch
(50,254 posts)The point is that only the hard things are really worth doing. Minor changes never matter.
And if HRC gets in facing a GOP congress, nothing she wants, even in half-loaf form, will ever get passed, so any talk of increments is absurd.
JRLeft
(7,010 posts)Last edited Sat Jan 23, 2016, 05:31 PM - Edit history (1)
pnwmom
(108,980 posts)We couldn't get 3/4 of the states to agree that women deserved the same rights as men.
Armstead
(47,803 posts)Maybe an excess of excuses is exactly the reason the decks are currently rigged against us.
tazkcmo
(7,300 posts)of a politician who's motto is No We Can't.
pnwmom
(108,980 posts)that their only order of business was obstruction.
Bernie will find himself with at best, a Democratic Senate, but not one with enough votes to prevent a filibuster. And he'll have to wait for another election before any more changes can occur.
murielm99
(30,745 posts)He is not even a Democrat.
Avalux
(35,015 posts)murielm99
(30,745 posts)That is just bogus.
Avalux
(35,015 posts)Uncle Joe
(58,366 posts)pnwmom
(108,980 posts)They had anything but a consistent message.
Kennedy was young and appealing and ostensibly liberal, Sanders reminisced in a 1987 interview with The Gadfly, a student newspaper at the University of Vermont. But I think at that point, seeing through Kennedy, and what liberalism was, was probably a significant step for me to understand that conventional politics or liberalism was not what was relevant.
In the same interview, he also criticized Jesse Jacksons decision to try and affect change by working within the Democratic party and offered some pointed remarks about Walter Mondale.
http://www.buzzfeed.com/ilanbenmeir/bernie-sanders-despised-democrats-in-1980s-said-a-jfk-speech#.rcB6zQZaaO
Skwmom
(12,685 posts)roguevalley
(40,656 posts)my uncle knew them personally. This third way bullshit would be anathema to them.
pnwmom
(108,980 posts)I also remember the Kennedys well. Bernie was no Kennedy -- and he didn't like them.
http://www.buzzfeed.com/ilanbenmeir/bernie-sanders-despised-democrats-in-1980s-said-a-jfk-speech#.rcB6zQZaaO
Vermont senator and Democratic presidential candidate Bernie Sanders once said that he was physically nauseated by a speech made by President John F. Kennedy when Sanders was a young man, because Kennedys hatred for the Cuban Revolution [
] was so strong.
Kennedy was young and appealing and ostensibly liberal, Sanders reminisced in a 1987 interview with The Gadfly, a student newspaper at the University of Vermont. But I think at that point, seeing through Kennedy, and what liberalism was, was probably a significant step for me to understand that conventional politics or liberalism was not what was relevant.
In the same interview, he also criticized Jesse Jacksons decision to try and affect change by working within the Democratic party and offered some pointed remarks about Walter Mondale.
cali
(114,904 posts)You are easily confused if you think that's conflating him with RFK.
murielm99
(30,745 posts)The only people who are confused are the ones who think some pie-in-the-sky non Democrat is going to be our nominee.
pnwmom
(108,980 posts)and who despised other Dems.
http://www.buzzfeed.com/ilanbenmeir/bernie-sanders-despised-democrats-in-1980s-said-a-jfk-speech#.xvY08e2jJ
Vermont senator and Democratic presidential candidate Bernie Sanders once said that he was physically nauseated by a speech made by President John F. Kennedy when Sanders was a young man, because Kennedys hatred for the Cuban Revolution [
] was so strong.
Kennedy was young and appealing and ostensibly liberal, Sanders reminisced in a 1987 interview with The Gadfly, a student newspaper at the University of Vermont. But I think at that point, seeing through Kennedy, and what liberalism was, was probably a significant step for me to understand that conventional politics or liberalism was not what was relevant.
In the same interview, he also criticized Jesse Jacksons decision to try and affect change by working within the Democratic party and offered some pointed remarks about Walter Mondale.
Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)And I take great exception to your snarky insinuation that Bernie is "less than"
or somehow "unworthy" of being compared and contrasted with Bobby Kennedy.
I'm not even going to dignify your unseemly remark by 'making a case', except
to say that ever since Bobby was taken so brutally and cruelly from us -- precisely
because he was standing tall for peace, racial justice and income redistribution,
and doing it in a way that was winning the hearts & minds across America -- I
have been waiting for someone who could hold a candle to his generous spirit,
and how he courageously took-on the PTB, and was murdered in cold blood for
his trouble. I'm not waiting anymore, because Bernie touches that same place in
me, that Bobby touched
While your snide comment is technically correct -- of course, Bernie is not Bobby,
duh -- your jaundiced remark is very unseemly and highly offensive to me.
mimi85
(1,805 posts)Avalux
(35,015 posts)I wasn't around during Bobby Kennedy's time, so it's great to hear from someone who worked on his campaign, and sees the similarity with what's happening now.
Your most welcome. I was in my early 20's then, like so many of Bernie's supporters today, and I'm
so grateful to have lived long enough to see this and be a part of this. Like a full-circle.
Thank you for your post.
libdem4life
(13,877 posts)Well, I'm all in for the Jewish Senator from Vermont. Yes, he can. And yes, I remember that horrible night.
I, too, would like to see a woman for President. But willing to wait for the right one...one who can unite us...bring us together.
99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)It's heart-warming to feel the solidarity.
pnwmom
(108,980 posts)I'm sure none of the Kennedys appreciated that comment or agreed with his point of view.
Kennedy was young and appealing and ostensibly liberal, Sanders reminisced in a 1987 interview with The Gadfly, a student newspaper at the University of Vermont. But I think at that point, seeing through Kennedy, and what liberalism was, was probably a significant step for me to understand that conventional politics or liberalism was not what was relevant.
In the same interview, he also criticized Jesse Jacksons decision to try and affect change by working within the Democratic party and offered some pointed remarks about Walter Mondale.
http://www.buzzfeed.com/ilanbenmeir/bernie-sanders-despised-democrats-in-1980s-said-a-jfk-speech#.xvY08e2jJ
99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)and that speech was given many years earlier, when the Cold War was in full swing.
Bobby ran in 1968, after seeing hid brother murdered, after the desegregation struggles in the South
between 1962-68. After him and JFK sending Federal Marshals to University of Alabama in 1963.
And in the intervening years, RFK and MLK Jr. became closer as the years passed, until Martin was
also murdered, when Bobby gave his heart-rending speech that horrid evening in Indianapolis.
So what was your point again? What does what Bernie thinks about ONE JFK speech in 1962 have
to do with the Bobby Kennedy who ran for president in 1968?
pnwmom
(108,980 posts)describing his enlightenment about the failures of liberalism being when he listened to John Kennedy.
99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)and even if Sanders did say that about one speech, I still fail to see the point
of your post, unless it's to sow ill-will, be divisive and disrespectful of Bobby's
legacy.
pnwmom
(108,980 posts)Bobby wouldn't have appreciated Bernie talking about his brother that way.
99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)Last edited Mon Feb 1, 2016, 08:13 PM - Edit history (1)
Again, so fucking what? You keep repeating that same mantra over and over
"Bobby wouldn't have appreciated Bernie talking about his brother that way."
I heard you the freaking first time. I'm not overly-impressed.
Can we please move on to something else now?
highprincipleswork
(3,111 posts)I can think of many important ways he is very much like the late great Bobby Kennedy, and someone Bobby Kennedy would probably be proud of right now.
I can also think of some other candidates who probably wouldn't make Bobby Kennedy's list.
uponit7771
(90,347 posts)... congress that he consummately dismissed? tia
highprincipleswork
(3,111 posts)Were you really there? I was. And his campaign was highlighted by an extreme form of idealism, much as Bernie's is today. Check out the descriptions of his platform and policies in this article, and I think you will see there is nothing there more detailed or more "workable" than what Bernie is fighting for.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_F._Kennedy_presidential_campaign,_1968
What is eminently true is that he inspired people, and again Bernie is doing that.
As to the gerrymandered Congress? Well, if people like DWS were not in charge and de-motivating people to the point where they do not show up for elections, we wouldn't even have that gerrymandering in place.
Time for enthusiasm. Time to work for every advance we can get, no matter how unlikely it may seem at the time. Time to change people's minds that have been held captive by propaganda for so long.
We will not get there, to these goals, with Hillary.
uponit7771
(90,347 posts)... then when RFK was alive and now and RFK had a workable plan that was reasonable not just ideals.
I don't know what's not factual about what I typed.
highprincipleswork
(3,111 posts)uponit7771
(90,347 posts)highprincipleswork
(3,111 posts)With the philosophy you espouse, no progress can ever be made.
I suggest you join the forces that are actually trying to change the way things are, not those who are either going backwards or reinforcing the rather oppressive status quo.
That's pretty much what being "Progressive" is all about.
Empowerer
(3,900 posts)Those are divisive and the chances of getting them passed are nil, so better just leave things the way they are . . .
highprincipleswork
(3,111 posts)Reparations.
Bobby certainly didn't campaign on reparations. to my knowledge. I'm not certain he would now. There are Black leaders as well who don't believe reparations are the way to go.
Bernie is not the only one who isn't calling for reparations. Nobody is.
Have you considered the saying "not to make the perfect the enemy of the good"?
To those of us who support Bernie, and who watch his record over the years, it seems so very clear that he will hold as true or more true to ideals that are in the same ballpark as "reparations" as will anybody else. That is why we work for him and support him.
But it is true, that if that is your main cause, and you think someone has a better chance of getting that done, you should support them, lobby for them, convince us for them. Hopefully that is backed up by what they say and what they do.
Wishing you well in getting what you want and what you need. In the end, that is what we can support other people in - their quest to get that which they want and particularly what they need.
Take good care along the way.
DaveT
(687 posts)He was a friend of mine. DU Poster, you're no Lloyd Bentsen.
libdem4life
(13,877 posts)trueblue2007
(17,228 posts)roguevalley
(40,656 posts)Ken Burch
(50,254 posts)It doesn't matter what label he was first elected under. Only right-wing Dems make an issue out of this non-issue. Progressives know it doesn't matter.
tazkcmo
(7,300 posts)70% of Americans aren't? Only 30% of Americans are Democratic Party members and after this election that number will drop as many have registered as Democrats just to participate in caucuses and primaries in order to vote for that most famous non-Democrat, Sen. Sanders.
Ken Burch
(50,254 posts)If you're a centrist and you still defend Bill's welfare bill, you never cared about the poor.
merrily
(45,251 posts)valerief
(53,235 posts)murielm99
(30,745 posts)under the bus, too?
Most people know that about Bobby. They know his daddy got him that job. They know that no one, especially in politics, is pure. Oh, except for Bernie.
You people are beyond ridiculous. Your hero worship of your candidate has gotten dangerously out of hand.
valerief
(53,235 posts)murielm99
(30,745 posts)Are you black? Did I mention race anywhere in my post?
valerief
(53,235 posts)libdem4life
(13,877 posts)or something. There is "worship" and there is "admire", "support", etc. I don't get the danger, however. That's the one that baffles me.
murielm99
(30,745 posts)Bernie supporters. Do you really need it spelled out? I guess that says a lot about bernie supporters.
Again, where did I say anything about race? Are you accusing me of being racist? Do you see how ridiculous all this gets?
And goodbye.
99Forever
(14,524 posts)... was Bobby Kennedy. Now I am actively involved in the Bernie Sanders campaign.
The only two in my entire lifetime that actually deserved my time, support, and vote.
Quite frankly, your opinion of Bernie means jack shit to me.
Run along and have another bowl of sour grapes.
Empowerer
(3,900 posts)99Forever
(14,524 posts)Bernie didn't have all of the advantages of being a member of one of the most wealthy and powerful families in the USA like Bobby did, but yet they ended up with very similar views on where this Nation should be headed and how to get there. Too bad most other rich, powerful people in this Nation don't have the goodness and decent character to emulate them.
libdem4life
(13,877 posts)lot of us helping pull him up now.
Uncle Joe
(58,366 posts)Thanks for the thread, Avalux.
Avalux
(35,015 posts)retrowire
(10,345 posts)feel the bern!
highprincipleswork
(3,111 posts)Bernie is our best chance for Progressive politics since Bobby Kennedy, in my opinion.
If elected, Bobby Kennedy would have influenced America politics for decades. So will Bernie, if we just stand together and fight for that which we know is right.
Empowerer
(3,900 posts)Not even close.
juxtaposed
(2,778 posts)ypsfonos
(144 posts)long overdue, maybe just in time!
libdem4life
(13,877 posts)Empowerer
(3,900 posts)Do you realize that you sound like you're talking about a cult leader?
WillyT
(72,631 posts)amborin
(16,631 posts)kydo
(2,679 posts)The quote is really George Bernard Shaw (18561950)
QUOTATION: You see things; and you say Why? But I dream things that never were; and I say Why not?
ATTRIBUTION: GEORGE BERNARD SHAW, Back to Methuselah, act I, Selected Plays with Prefaces, vol. 2, p. 7 (1949). The serpent says these words to Eve.
President John F. Kennedy quoted these words in his address to the Irish Parliament, Dublin, June 28, 1963.Public Papers of the Presidents of the United States: John F. Kennedy, 1963, p. 537.
Senator Robert F. Kennedy used a similar quotation as a theme of his 1968 campaign for the presidential nomination: Some men see things as they are and say, why; I dream things that never were and say, why not. Senator Edward M. Kennedy quoted these words of Robert Kennedys in his eulogy for his brother in 1968.The New York Times, June 9, 1968, p. 56.
========
Now there is another quote that both RFK and JFK used and also not theirs ...
Only three things are real: God, human folly, and laughter. The first two are beyond our comprehension so we must do what we can with the third.
Aubrey Menen, Rama Retold (1954), p. 231. This is a modern retelling of part of the Ramayana.