2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumHillary’s big healthcare con
The call to make the ACA work signals powerful medical interests and Big Pharma will make millions under Clinton
SALON, by Chris Brooks
1-23-16
The Clinton campaigns cynical capitulation to corporate power appears to be reaching brazen new heights as the Democratic presidential nominee goes on the offensive and publicly attacks her rivals for their advocacy of single-payer healthcare.
Clinton, who has racked up just under $3 million from the healthcare industry in speaking fees over the past two years, has publicly dismissed the Medicare-for-all model proposed by Bernie Sanders as well as the publicly administered health insurance option floated during the debates surrounding the Affordable Care Act (ACA), claiming such policy proposals are risky and irresponsible.
....very large Snip....
Why did Obama and the Democrats purposely kill the public option? Because they made a quid pro quo backroom deal with industry lobbyists, promising that no government alternative to private health insurance would be in the final bill if the industry would provide their support.
Similarly, the White House reached a secret agreement with the pharmaceutical lobby, agreeing to table substantive reforms, such as the government leveraging its negotiating power to lower drug prices or legalizing the importation of drugs from Canada, and including policies that Big Pharma favored and stood to reap a windfall of billions of dollars in profits from. In exchange, the White House received the industrys support, which resulted in the pharmaceutical lobby spending $150 million on television commercials in support of the ACA, more than the total amount Republican Senator John McCain spent on his 2008 presidential campaign.
The public option, expanding Medicare coverage to people beginning at the age of 55, importation of drugs from Canada and bulk price negotiations were all traded away by the Obama administration, and in their place Democrats offered $450 billion in taxpayer money to publicly subsidize the mandated purchase of private health insurance, effectively expanding and entrenching the corporate monopoly over the collective health of millions of people while still managing to leave 27 million people uninsured by 2025.
And all of this was done with industry lobbyists behind closed doors....
Read more, including stats on the revolving door btn DC and healthcare lobbyists~
http://www.salon.com/2016/01/23/hillarys_big_healthcare_con_the_cynical_myth_she_keeps_repeating_about_bernie_sanders_and_single_payer/
Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)m-lekktor
(3,675 posts)TubbersUK
(1,439 posts)tecelote
(5,122 posts)"The call to make the ACA work signals powerful medical interests and Big Pharma will make millions under Clinton "
Hillary Clinton | Bought and Paid For
Bernie Sanders | Not for Sale
reddread
(6,896 posts)FreakinDJ
(17,644 posts)RiverLover
(7,830 posts)She is considering putting the 1100/mo into savings instead and getting a catastrophic only plan because her deductible is so high anyways.
Its ridiculous. Tragic. Something....very hard to defend this to her. I don't even try.
FreakinDJ
(17,644 posts)Doctor_J
(36,392 posts)I work for a 300 person non profit.
BadgerKid
(4,553 posts)
Whats more is that premiums are expected to continue increasing through 2017 and beyond. Thats when the Affordable Care Acts two central cost-concealing provisionsand the associated taxpayer handoutswill expire.
The first is called re-insurance, which uses taxpayer dollars to subsidize the highest-cost patients. The second is risk corridors, through which insurers are compensated for higher-than-anticipated costslike they experienced in 2014 and 2015. Once these programs expire, the lost revenue will have to be replacedand it will come directly in the form of higher premiums. Dr. Stephen Parente of the Carlson School of Management at the University of Minnesota has estimated what families and individuals can expect to pay.
Using a health insurance simulation model funded in part by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Dr. Parente estimates the expiration of these programs will cause average premiums for middle-of-the-road silver plans to jump another 12.1% and 9.2% for individual and family policies, respectively, in 2017. And the years after that will only see further hikes.
http://www.forbes.com/sites/realspin/2015/12/08/obamacare-premiums-are-on-the-rise-but-dont-blame-insurers
This doesn't look encouraging.
Dustlawyer
(10,495 posts)them, all without a single person or group representing the people. We have no access to our government officials because we don't contribute $$$$!!! At least not like the Plutocrats do!
gordyfl
(598 posts)beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Thanks for sharing!
SHRED
(28,136 posts)Last edited Sat Jan 23, 2016, 10:07 AM - Edit history (1)
...was just like Obamacare?
If so then that would be incredible considering history.
http://thehill.com/policy/healthcare/266660-clinton-obamacare-was-hillarycare-first
Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)CanSocDem
(3,286 posts)...won't give up easily. Nor will their spokespeople willingly admit to lying.
K & R
.
SHRED
(28,136 posts)Telling it like it is!
SHRED
(28,136 posts)Not counting co-pays or deductibles.
I'm in Covered California and get subsidized (actually it goes to the insurance corporation) but still it's expensive.
raouldukelives
(5,178 posts)secondwind
(16,903 posts)FailureToCommunicate
(14,014 posts)Ugh.
CharlotteVale
(2,717 posts)Rosa Luxemburg
(28,627 posts)How could she take all that money.
SmittynMo
(3,544 posts)was never intended to be a permanent solution. As long as it is in place, the money flows to big pharma, and the insurance industry, and single payer will never be on the table. Now is our chance.
draa
(975 posts)There is no getting it back because, with the corruption in campaign finance, a candidate that's immoral will just take money from the insurance companies to leave it off the table.
We have a chance to save SPHC. If our party gets it's way though that will be lost for a generation or more with a Clinton win. College tuition is in the same position. We either make damn sure Clinton doesn't win the WH or we lose everything.
Still In Wisconsin
(4,450 posts)why would she bite the hand that feeds her?
Thanks.
SHRED
(28,136 posts)RiverLover
(7,830 posts)Thanks for posting, SHRED!!!
slipslidingaway
(21,210 posts)RiverLover
(7,830 posts)slipslidingaway
(21,210 posts)Uncle Joe
(58,365 posts)Thanks for the thread, RiverLover.