2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumPredictive Markets odds for winners of the first 4 primary states
As of 8:20 est:
Iowa:
HRC - 64%
SBS - 36%
MOM - 0%
NH:
SBS - 73%
HRC - 27%
MOM - 0%
NV:
HRC - 65%
SBS - 35%
MOM - 0%
SC:
HRC - 79%
SBS - 21%
MOM - 0%
http://predictwise.com/politics/2016-president-primaries#EarlyDEM
Bonus markets:
Dem Nomination:
HRC - 82%
SBS - 17%
MOM - 1%
President:
HRC - 54%
SBS - 9%
MOM - 0%
Yeah, very little love for O'Malley.
Binkie The Clown
(7,911 posts)And gamblers are not very smart as a rule or they wouldn't throw money away.
So the net take away is that a group of reckless gamblers with no more political knowledge than the average Joe is betting that Clinton will win for no other reason than that the media has convinced them that such is the case.
Very scientific.
Ferd Berfel
(3,687 posts)DirtyHippyBastard
(217 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)Was pretty skeptical that our Elo forecast had Denver favored but looking better now. Are the Broncos underrated?
http://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2015-nfl-predictions/
Funny how these things work.
workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)It is...funny how these things work.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)Very few fans outside of Denver thought Denver would go further than New England.
Health Wagon
(99 posts)Let me ask you a question - how much did PredictWise guess that New England would win today?
Ed Suspicious
(8,879 posts)morningfog
(18,115 posts)and Bernie is likely to win Iowa. And the betting number for Bernie in NH is far to low.
DavidDvorkin
(19,479 posts)I'm an O'Malley supporter, and I largely agree with those odds.
Godhumor
(6,437 posts)One could actually argue they're favorable to Sanders considering where SC could be at the moment.
Alfresco
(1,698 posts)LettuceSea
(337 posts)you can move those markets big time...they are very illiquid. Worse, think about what multiple people could do if they jammed it at once...
Scary.