Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Godhumor

(6,437 posts)
Sun Jan 24, 2016, 09:29 PM Jan 2016

Predictive Markets odds for winners of the first 4 primary states

As of 8:20 est:

Iowa:
HRC - 64%
SBS - 36%
MOM - 0%

NH:
SBS - 73%
HRC - 27%
MOM - 0%

NV:
HRC - 65%
SBS - 35%
MOM - 0%

SC:
HRC - 79%
SBS - 21%
MOM - 0%

http://predictwise.com/politics/2016-president-primaries#EarlyDEM

Bonus markets:

Dem Nomination:
HRC - 82%
SBS - 17%
MOM - 1%

President:
HRC - 54%
SBS - 9%
MOM - 0%


Yeah, very little love for O'Malley.

13 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Predictive Markets odds for winners of the first 4 primary states (Original Post) Godhumor Jan 2016 OP
Based on people's cash money bets, so all we know is that Clinton appeals to gamblers. Binkie The Clown Jan 2016 #1
True, and Bernie appeals to...... Ferd Berfel Jan 2016 #7
1/23/16- Patriots favored by 3 over Broncos... Funny how these things work DirtyHippyBastard Jan 2016 #2
Nate Silver predicted DemocratSinceBirth Jan 2016 #9
Good old Nate workinclasszero Jan 2016 #10
He was starting to doubt himself but was vindicated in the end. DemocratSinceBirth Jan 2016 #11
All of it is 100% pure unadulterated bullshit. Health Wagon Jan 2016 #3
Any port in the storm. Ed Suspicious Jan 2016 #4
Thatnlooks good considering Iowa and NV are matched morningfog Jan 2016 #5
Predictive markets have nothing to do with love or the lack of it DavidDvorkin Jan 2016 #6
Yeah I think they're right, about now Godhumor Jan 2016 #8
I like Dem odds. :-) Alfresco Jan 2016 #12
FWIW, with $850... LettuceSea Jan 2016 #13

Binkie The Clown

(7,911 posts)
1. Based on people's cash money bets, so all we know is that Clinton appeals to gamblers.
Sun Jan 24, 2016, 10:13 PM
Jan 2016

And gamblers are not very smart as a rule or they wouldn't throw money away.

So the net take away is that a group of reckless gamblers with no more political knowledge than the average Joe is betting that Clinton will win for no other reason than that the media has convinced them that such is the case.

Very scientific.

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,710 posts)
9. Nate Silver predicted
Mon Jan 25, 2016, 09:50 AM
Jan 2016
Before the season even began, Nate Silver , relying solely on the numbers, predicted Denver would finish ahead of New England:




Was pretty skeptical that our Elo forecast had Denver favored but looking better now. Are the Broncos underrated?


http://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2015-nfl-predictions/




Funny how these things work.

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,710 posts)
11. He was starting to doubt himself but was vindicated in the end.
Mon Jan 25, 2016, 10:07 AM
Jan 2016

Very few fans outside of Denver thought Denver would go further than New England.

 

Health Wagon

(99 posts)
3. All of it is 100% pure unadulterated bullshit.
Sun Jan 24, 2016, 10:32 PM
Jan 2016

Let me ask you a question - how much did PredictWise guess that New England would win today?

 

morningfog

(18,115 posts)
5. Thatnlooks good considering Iowa and NV are matched
Sun Jan 24, 2016, 10:42 PM
Jan 2016

and Bernie is likely to win Iowa. And the betting number for Bernie in NH is far to low.

DavidDvorkin

(19,479 posts)
6. Predictive markets have nothing to do with love or the lack of it
Sun Jan 24, 2016, 10:43 PM
Jan 2016

I'm an O'Malley supporter, and I largely agree with those odds.

Godhumor

(6,437 posts)
8. Yeah I think they're right, about now
Mon Jan 25, 2016, 09:44 AM
Jan 2016

One could actually argue they're favorable to Sanders considering where SC could be at the moment.

LettuceSea

(337 posts)
13. FWIW, with $850...
Mon Jan 25, 2016, 10:28 AM
Jan 2016

you can move those markets big time...they are very illiquid. Worse, think about what multiple people could do if they jammed it at once...

Scary.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Predictive Markets odds f...