2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumIt looks like Obama is favoring Hillary over Bernie and that isn't surprising at all.
I don't think he actually undercut Bernie in his interview with Politico, but I do think he wants Hillary to ultimately prevail over Bernie Sanders.
A few reasons IMO:
1) Obama knows Bernie would get beat down like a rented mule in the general election. At the end of the day, we cannot afford to have the GOP win the Presidency. Up to this point, Bernie has been handled with kid gloves by the media and the GOP. Once he starts to get scrutinized, he will completely fall apart.
2) Obama has been President for 7 years and he knows what it takes. Bernie doesn't have the temperament to be President. He's just too angry all the time. His campaign is a far cry from Obama's campaign in 2008. Obama's campaign was uplifting and positive. Bernie, on the other hand, is running on a message of anger and frustration. For Bernie, it's all about doom and gloom.
3) Bernie called for Obama to face primary opposition in 2012. That would have only helped the GOP and Mitt Romney. This probably didn't sit too well with Obama considering what was at stake.
Add this up and it's no surprise Obama wants Hillary to beat Bernie Sanders.
Obama is a very popular President among Dems. He's had extremely high approval ratings among Dems throughout his Presidency. He's also very popular with African Americans.
What Obama says carries a lot of weight.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)They haven't figured out yet that the attacks only strengthen Sanders and make him look better.
daleanime
(17,796 posts)the TPP. Why would he want some one who's again the deal he seems to be working the hardest for?
cascadiance
(19,537 posts)Bernie is the only big threat to their having BOUGHT our government to screw us to STEAL and REDISTRIBUTE our wealth for themselves!
tk2kewl
(18,133 posts)daleanime
(17,796 posts)DanTex
(20,709 posts)If it really looks like Bernie might win, I don't think it's totally out of the question. Obama doesn't want to see the GOP win next November any more than you or I do. It would be contrary to tradition for the president to take a side in a primary (at least I think so, is there precedent for this?), but a Bernie nomination obviously puts his legacy at risk, as president Trump/Cruz would undo all his accomplishments, so if it starts going that way, who knows?
roguevalley
(40,656 posts)TPP and getting single payer. He doesn't want his legacy undone by Bernie taking it to the best conclusion. Bernie is beating trump by double digits. These talking points are laughable.
MeNMyVolt
(1,095 posts)That and I don't trust him on social justice issues.
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)once opposed the rights of others, never once berated LGBT families in his verbiage, one of the few with the courage and decency to vote against Bill Clinton's DOMA?
Hard to see the logic in that. Hillary was basically the last name Democrat to stop opposing my rights. Held on white knuckle style to her biases. Won't vote ever again for any primary candidate who has opposed my rights as Hillary has. Never going to happen again. Obama was the last.
tecelote
(5,122 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)Had things gone a little bit different in some states or if the sequence of primaries and caucuses been a little different, Obama added, she could have easily won.
The truth is, in 2007 and 2008, sometimes my supporters and my staff, I think, got too huffy about what were legitimate questions she was raising, he admitted. And there were times where I think the media probably was a little unfair to her and tilted a little my way in calling her out.
Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2016/01/obama-iowa-2016-sanders-off-message-218166#ixzz3yHnh9ctO
Barack Obama is a prince.
azurnoir
(45,850 posts)which he has not as of yet
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2016/01/obama-iowa-2016-sanders-off-message-218166#ixzz3yHq3yGi1
azurnoir
(45,850 posts)which has been the relationship between Obama and Clinton's since he took the nomination in 2008
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)A monster. She was fired but of course now she hold a hugely important position of great power as reward for her attack. A monster. That's 'huffy'?
I'm not faith based, so I see Barack hire Power, Power calls Hillary a monster, Obama appoints Power. Clearly Obama is fine with calling Hillary a monster. If he was not, Power would not have power. But she does, as reward for being a Monster Shouter.
I wish people would own what they do. It's so smarmy the way politicians are about themselves.
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)the hateful biases of anyone who claimed to be 'of the faith' they both shared. It is not surprising to me in the least that those loyalties so loudly spoken in the past still prove true.
Sadly for her, Obama got the last free pass for anti gay politicians. Those who advanced themselves by those means are not ever getting a vote from me in any primary. If that sort of candidate is nominated that will define this Party as being so bigoted it makes the Oscars look inclusive. I'm done with that sort of person, they are the past and need to step off the leadership stage.
randys1
(16,286 posts)swilton
(5,069 posts)How do you know what Obama knows..........didn't know we had any mind readers around here? More importantly your first point totally contradicts the polling evidence that shows Sanders ahead of Hillary in match-ups against the GOP contenders.
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)Bernie has been handled with kid gloves by the media and the GOP. Hell, Karl Rove is openly rooting for Bernie Sanders to beat Hillary.
Bernie hasn't been scrutinized and once he does get scrutiny, it would be all over for his candidacy.
jkbRN
(850 posts)Is what Bernie is fighting to make up for, HRC will continue the same crap as Obama. Horrible compromises.
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)Anonymous message boards are hardly representative of anything.
In fact, Obama's approval ratings among liberal Dems currently stands at 92%
http://www.gallup.com/poll/124922/Presidential-Approval-Center.aspx
gwheezie
(3,580 posts)Then Bernie wouldn't have this problem.
Sarcasm.
kath
(10,565 posts)Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)mhatrw
(10,786 posts)It's no surprise.
riversedge
(70,242 posts)Obama nudges Democrats toward Clinton, even as White House strains to remain neutral in primary
http://www.latimes.com/nation/la-na-obama-democratic-race-20150125-story.html
During an interview published Monday, President Obama was cautious in showing explicit favor in the Democratic race, but he underscored the strengths of front-runner Hillary Clinton. (Paul Sancya / Associated Press)
Michael A. Memoli and Christi ParsonsContact Reporters
Any concerns at the White House about a potentially divisive Democratic primary seemed put to rest when Vice President Joe Biden took himself out of the running last fall.
But with the first votes being cast in a week in Iowa and an eye toward preserving his own legacy, President Obama came off the sidelines Monday and inserted himself into the increasingly bitter nomination fight between his former secretary of State, Hillary Clinton, and the populist insurgent, Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.).
Obama abandoned almost all pretense of disengagement by suggesting in an interview that Clinton is a good, smart, tough person up against a bright, shiny new alternative who remains less tested than her, a reminder about picking a nominee who can win a tough general election.
She can govern and she can start here, Day One, more experienced than any non-vice-president has ever been who aspires to this office, he told Politico.....................